Development and evaluation of design thinking-based learning packets for enhancing innovation skills

Joie B. Monreal & Julie Fe D. Panoy

Volume 3 Issue 3, September 2023

PDF

https://doi.org/10.53378/353005

Manuscript Title Page

Anonymous Manuscript Template

Other submissions

Abstract

Innovation skills such as creativity, empathy, experimentation, communication and collaboration are vital for the 21st century learners. Hence, this study determined the effectiveness of design thinking-based learning packet in enhancing the innovation skills of grade 11 learners. Descriptive statistics and t-test were utilized to look at associations between the pretest–posttest and survey questionnaire. The pretest and posttest results measured the effectiveness of the learning packet in enhancing the innovation skills of the learners, whereas the survey results were utilized to describe the students’ innovation skills. A content validation tool from the Department of Education was utilized to determine the level of acceptability of the learning packet before its usage. The findings indicated that the level of acceptability of the learning packet was very high which implies that the experts recommend its use. The survey results showed that students’ innovation skill is high while the pretest and post-test showed a significant difference in all terms. The findings suggest the use of design thinking-based learning packet as a supplemental learning material in teaching Physical Science to enhance the innovation skills of learners.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Disclosure statement

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Data and Materials Availability

AI Declaration

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Agbo, F.J., Olaleye, S.A., Bower, M. et al. Examining the relationships between students’ perceptions of technology, pedagogy, and cognition: the case of immersive virtual reality mini games to foster computational thinking in higher education. Smart Learn. Environ. 10, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00233-1

Aguilar, F.M. & Panoy, J.D. (2022). Infographic Material as Supplementary Learning Tool in Advancing Scientific Knowledge of Modular Distance Learners. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Volume 2 Issue 4, pp. 114 – 131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352942

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Amarin and Ghishan, 2013; Ayas, 2006; Chitanana, 2012; and Gold, 2001); Rasha Essam (2016) Constructivist and Cognitive Multimedia Learning Theories as Tools for Training. American University in Cairo

Anives, J.B. & Ching, D.A. (2022). Application of Task-Based Learning Module in Mathematics V. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 1, pp. 97 – 113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352865

Aquino, H.I. & Ching, D.A. (2022). Effects of Reflective Learning Resource Material on Achievement of Mathematics Learning Outcome. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 1, pp. 114 – 130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352866

Arida, R.A., Andrade, R.R. & Mabilangan, R.A. (2022). Mathematics Self-Efficacy and the Use of Virtual Math Manipulatives Among Pre-Service Teachers. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 2, pp. 45 – 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352897

Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME)

Bao, L., Koenig, K. Physics education research for 21st century learning. Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res 1, 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Barak, M., Morad, S. & Ragonis, N. (2013). Students’ innovative thinking and their perceptions about the ideal learning environment. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, 111–125

Barnhill, S. (1998). Technology Lab 2000. Tech Directions. 57., 30-31.

Boyraz (2021), A scale development study for one of the 21st century skills: Collaboration at secondary schools. School of Foreign Languages, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey.

Brown, T. & Katz, B. (2009). Change by Design. Harper Collins Cambridge.

Çellek, T. (2002). Yaratıcılık ve eğitim sistemimizdeki boyutu [Creativity and its size in our education system]. Bilim, Eğitim ve Düşünce Dergisi, 2(1), 2-4.

Chozas, M.S. & Cuenca, Z.M. (2022). Effectiveness of Learner’s Intervention Booklet in Improving the Skills in Handicraft. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 3, pp. 227 – 243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352923

Crotty, M. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Thousands Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2021). What is design thinking and why is it so popular? Interaction Design Foundation.

Davidsen (2020); Ilma S., Al-Muhdhar M., Rohman F., Saptasari M., (2022), Promote collaboration skills during the COVID-19 pandemic through Predict-Observe-Explain-based Project (POEP) learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)

Department of Education Dasmariñas (2020), Development of PIVOT 4A learner’s Packet for all key stages. City schools division of Dasmariñas.

Drucker, P. (2007). The practice of management. Butterworth-Heinemann,

Eisenberg 2003; cited by Salovey & Detweiler (2008); Gulec, S. (2020). The Analysis of the Concept of Empathy Skill in Postgraduate Social Studies Theses. International Education Studies; Vol. 13, No. 5; 2020

Estrellado, M. V. (2021). Increasing Students’ Mastery in Mathematics 6 through “I Love Math”. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 38 – 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/346082

Fischer, S., Barabasch, A. Conceptualizations and implementation of creativity in higher vocational teacher education – a qualitative study of lecturers. Empirical Res Voc Ed Train 15, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-023-00144-y

Fosnot, C. T. 1996. “Constructivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning.” In Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives and Practice, ed. C. T. Fosnot, 8–33. New York:Teachers College Press.

Gaggioli (2011); Ilma S., Al-Muhdhar M., Rohman F., Saptasari M., (2022), Promote collaboration skills during the COVID-19 pandemic through Predict-Observe-Explain-based Project (POEP) learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)

Gokap and Inel (2022). An Analysis of Secondary School Students’ Empathy Skills in terms of Student- and School-Related VariablesEducational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, v17 n1 p40-57 2022

Gray and Diloreto (2016). The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments. University of Florida.

Habók, A., Nagy, J. In-service teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning. SpringerPlus 5, 83 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1725-4

Henderson, T. (2017, May 8). Why innovation is crucial to your organization’s long-term success. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2017/05/08/why-innovation-is-crucial-to-your- organizations-long-term-success/?sh=5603920f3098

Jamal, A. (2022). Identifying the Innovative Pedagogies of the 21st Century

Johannes Schult, Nicole Mahler, Benjamin Fauth & Marlit A. Lindner (2022) Did students learn less during the COVID-19 pandemic? Reading and mathematics competencies before and after the first pandemic wave, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33:4, 544-563, DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2022.2061014

Jolly (2009). Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Transforming Classrooms, Teaching, and Student Learning at the Tertiary Level. AIP Conference Proceedings 1119, 52 (2009). American Institute of Physics.

Kong, SC. Delivery and evaluation of an e-Learning framework through computer-aided analysis of learners’ reflection text in a teacher development course. RPTEL 16, 28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00172-w

Lee, C., & Benza, R. (2015). Teaching Innovation Skills: Application of Design Thinking in a Graduate Marketing Course. Business Education Innovation Journal, 7(1).

Linton, G., & Klinton, M. (2019). University entrepreneurship education: a design thinking approach to learning. Journal of innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1-11.

Lopez, E.B. (2021). Comics-Based Worktext for Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Skills in World Literature. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp. 67 – 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352896

Ludewig U, Kleinkorres R, Schaufelberger R, Schlitter T, Lorenz R, König C, Frey A and McElvany N (2022) COVID-19 Pandemic and Student Reading Achievement: Findings From a School Panel Study. Front. Psychol. 13:876485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876485

Magpantay, I.D. & Pasia, A.E. (2022). Problem-Based Learning Materials in Upskilling Mathematics Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Volume 2 Issue 4, pp. 74 – 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352940

Magulod Jr, G. C. (2018). Innovative learning tasks in enhancing the literary appreciation skills of students. Sage Open, 8(4), 2158244018820382.

Malaluan, J.S. & Andrade, R.R. (2023). Contextualized Question-Embedded Video-Based Teaching and Learning Tool: A Pathway in Improving Students’ Interest and Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 3 (2), 39-64. https://doi.org/10.53378/35299

Malele, V., & Ramaboka, M. E. (2020). The design thinking approach to students STEAM projects. Procedia CIRP, 91, 230-236.

Marzahi, T. (2001). Effectiveness of Self-Directed Learning Activity Packets Versus Lecture. Menomonie, Wisconsin, USA: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu.

Murillo-Zamorano, L.R., López Sánchez, J.Á., Godoy-Caballero, A.L. et al. Gamification and active learning in higher education: is it possible to match digital society, academia and students’ interests?. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 18, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00249-y

Nguyen V., Xayparseut, VYLAYCHIT & Anh Thuan NGUYEN (2019), Developing of Experimental Competence of Laos Pupils in Secondary School Science Classroom. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young

Nguyen, T. H., Pham, X. L., & TU, N. T. T. (2019). The Impact of Design Thinking on Problem Solving and Teamwork Mindset in A Flipped Classroom. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 96(96), 30-50.

Niruttimatee, P. K., & Sanrattana, W. (2022). An Online Program to Develop Teachers to Enhance the Innovation Skills of Students. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2), 533-543.

Noel, L. A., & Liub, T. L. (2017). Using design thinking to create a new education paradigm for elementary level children for higher student engagement and success. Design and Technology Education, 22(1),

Ojetunde, S.M., Ramnarain, U. Applying 4IRs in education technology to science pedagogy: effects and students’ experience. Smart Learn. Environ. 10, 32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00251-z

Origenes, R.W. (2021). Model for Web-based Learning Module in Senior High School General Chemistry. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 1, pp. 23 – 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352861

Ozturk, O.T. (2023). Examination of 21st century skills and technological competences of students of fine arts faculty. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2931

Palupi, B., Subiyantoro, S., Triyanto, T., & Rukayah, R. (2020). Creative-thinking skills in explanatory writing skills viewed from learning behaviour: A mixed method case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(1), 200-212.

Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637.

Price, J.K. Transforming learning for the smart learning environment: lessons learned from the Intel education initiatives. Smart Learn. Environ. 2, 16 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-015-0022-y

Rasha Essam (2016). Constructivist and Cognitive Multimedia Learning Theories as Tools for Training. American University in Cairo

Rex S. Galos, (2022) Science Learning Activity Packets (SciLAPs) on the Assessment of Learning Performance. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews

Reyes, M.M. & Salvador, N.T. (2022). Travelogue as Supplementary Learning Tool Towards Students’ Historical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 4, pp. 118 – 133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352949

Richardson,V. 1997. “Constructivist Teaching and Teacher Education:Theory and Practice.” In Constructivist Teacher Education: Building a World of New Understandings, ed. V. Richardson, p. 3–14. Bristol, Pa.: Falmer Press.

Rusmann, A., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2022). When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K-12 level. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2063-2091

Sabbah S., Hallabieh F., & Hussein O.(2020). Communication Skills among Undergraduate Students at Al-Quds University. World Journal of Education. Vol. 10, No. 6; 2020

San Luis, J.C. & Villafranca, M.R. (2022). Looking Through the Lens of Rural Science Teachers in the New Normal Setting. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 74 – 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352864

Sawyer, R. K. (2014). The future of learning: Grounding educational innovation in the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2^nd ed.) (pp. 726–746). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3).

Scheurman, Geoffrey. “From Behaviorist to Constructivist Teaching.” Science Education. vol. 62, no. 1, 1998, pp. 6-9.

Shah (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom International Journal of Education

Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd Edition). MIT Press

Sincoff, M. and Reid, T. (1974). The ABC’s of Learning Packets.Year round School Office. Phoenix Union High School System.

Sithara YJN Fernando1 & Faiz MMT Marikar1,* (2017) Constructivist Teaching/Learning Theory and Participatory Teaching Methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching.

Sjoberg, S. (2007). Constructivism and Learning. In E. Baker, B. McGaw and P. Peterson, (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd edition.). Oxford, Elsevier.

Smeda, N., Dakich, E. & Sharda, N. The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: a comprehensive study. Smart Learn. Environ. 1, 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3

Soland, Hamilton, & Stecher, 2013) Demirkol-Orak, S. & İnözü, J. (2021). Teachers’ awareness and actual practices of 21st century learning and innovation skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(2). 975-997.

Sprague, Debra and Christopher Dede. “Constructivism in the Classroom: If I Teach This Way, Am I Doing My Job?.” Learning and Leading with Technology, vol. 27, no. 1, 1999, pp. 6-21.

Stehle, S.M., Peters-Burton, E.E. Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. IJ STEM Ed 6, 39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Tiyaswati, I. (2021, March). Students’ creative and innovation skill on chapter of Newton’s law using SSCS learning model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012120). IOP Publishing.

Vallis and Redmond, (2021). Introducing design Introducing design thinking online to large business education courses for thinking online to large business education courses for twenty-first century learning. Journal of University teaching and learning practice.

Velentzas, J. O. H. N., & Broni, G. (2014). Communication cycle: Definition, process, models and examples. Recent advances in financial planning and product development, 17, 117-131.

Veronico N. Tarrayo & Ali G. Anudin (2023) Materials development in flexible learning amid the pandemic: perspectives from English language teachers in a Philippine state university, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17:1, 102-113, DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2021.1939703

VonGlaserfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in Education. In T. Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education, Supplement. Oxford/New York, Pergamon Press.

Wilson (1996); Shah (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom International Journal of Education

Yongco, J.O. & Del Valle, J.M. (2022). Development and Evaluation of Instructional Module for Special Program in Journalism. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 4, pp. 97 – 117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/35294

Zoller, Uri. “Teaching Tomorrow’s College Science Courses – Are We Getting It Right?.” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 29, no. 6, 2000, pp. 409-414.

Cite this article:

Monreal, J.B. & Panoy, J.D. (2023). Development and evaluation of design thinking-based learning packets for enhancing innovation skills. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 3 (3), 56-78. https://doi.org/10.53378/353005