Learning readiness and level of science learning outcomes in modular distance modality

Raechelle Joyce Siudad & John Vincent Aliazas

Volume 2 Issue 4, December 2022

Abstract

The study investigates the students’ learning readiness and their level of learning outcomes in the science subject during the modular distance modality. The descriptive-correlational design gathered relevant data to determine the relationship between learning readiness and the level of learning outcomes. Through a survey questionnaire, data were gathered from 273 Grade 11 students enrolled in a public High School during the School Year 2021-2022. Based on the results, the students are moderately ready in terms of self-knowledge, analyzing context, and activating knowledge. Similarly, they are also moderately ready in terms of designing learning pathways, clarifying knowledge, and apply understanding. Likewise, the respondents are at the level of moderately engaged in their learning outcomes in Science in modular distance modality as to knowledge in terms of content, process, and nature of science knowledge, and behavior and stewardship; as to skills in terms of science inquiry and self-efficacy; as to attitude in terms of interest and motivation. Finally, a significant relationship was found between learning readiness and the level of learning outcomes in Science in modular distance modality. These results suggest that knowing how learning readiness affects the level of learning outcomes in Science in modular distance modality can help to determine, develop and enhance self-learning materials that the learners may use in the distance modality.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Disclosure statement

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

AI Declaration

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Ambayon, E. E., & Millenes, C. (2020). Modular-based approach and students’ achievement in literature. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, Vol 8, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.3p.32

Aucensillo, J. (2021). Embracing new normal education amid COVID-19 health crisis. Philippine Information Agency.

Basl, J. (2011). Effect of school on interest in natural sciences: A comparison of the Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, and Norway based on PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 145–157.

Bernardo, J. (2020). Modular learning most preferred parents: DepEd. ABS-CBN News.

Binti Ibrahim, S. I. (2018). Developing and Validating a Measure of Self-Efficacy in Teaching using Science Inquiry Skills (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

Brunsell, E. (2010). The Five Features of Science Inquiry: How do you know?

Conway, B. (2017). “Reading Comprehension and Self Efficacy“. All Capstone Projects. 283.

Dangle, Y. R. P., & Sumaoang, J. D. (2020). The implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippine secondary public schools. In 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education, Vol. 100, p. 108.

Dangol, R., & Shrestha, M. (2019). Learning readiness and educational achievement among school students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 7(2), 467-476.

Dargo, J. & Dimas, M. (2021). Modular Distance Learning: Its Effect in the Academic Performance of Learners in the New Normal. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 204-208. STKIP Singkawang.

Farhoush, M., Ahmadi, M. (2013). The relationship of thinking styles and learning strategies with achievement motivation. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(35), 297-306.

Fulmer, G.W., Ma, H. & Liang, L.L. (2019). Middle school student attitudes toward science, and their relationships with instructional practices: a survey of Chinese students’ preferred versus actual instruction. Asia Pac. Sci. Educ. 5, 9.

Geng, S., Law, K.M.Y. & Niu, B. (2019) Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 16, 17 (2019).

Heick, T. (2013). A Self-Directed Learning Model for 21st Century Learners.

Ibrahim, I., Ali, R., Adam, M. Z., & Elfidel, N. (2014, December). Embedded systems teaching approaches & challenges. In 2014 IEEE 6th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 34-39). IEEE.

Karatas, K., & Zeybek, G. (2020). The Role of the Academic Field in the Relationship between Self-Directed Learning and 21st Century Skills. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 33-52.

Kazeni, M., Baloyi, E., & Gaigher, E. (2018). Effectiveness of individual and group investigations in developing integrated science inquiry skills. South African Journal of Education, 38(3).

Nardo, M. T. B. (2017). Modular instruction enhances learner autonomy. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1024-1034.

Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M., & Bonney, R. (2018). A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2).

Prakash, J. (2012). Brief notes on the Thorndike’s Laws of Learning. Preserve articles.

Purwanto, B. (2012). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Talk-Write (TTW) dan Tipe Think Pair Sher (TPS) pada Materi Statiska ditinjau dariKemandirian Belajar Siswa SMA di Kabupaten Madiun. Tesis UNS. Tidakdipublikasikan.

Reimers, F., Schleicher, A., Saavedra, J., & Tuominen, S. (2020). Supporting the continuation of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Oecd, 1(1), 1-38.

Repe, S. R., & Student, M. S. T (2021). Phenomenological Inquiry on Science Educators in Administering Self-Directed Learning Modules under New Normal Education.

Ridwan, I. I., Ali, R., Mohamed, I. I., Adam, M. Z., & Elfadil, N. (2016, November). Rasch measurement analysis for validation instrument to evaluate students’ technical readiness for embedded systems. In 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) (pp. 2115-2119).

Saeid, Nasim & Eslaminejad, Tahere (2016). Relationship between Student’s Self-Directed-Learning Readiness and Academic Self-Efficacy and Achievement Motivation in Students. International Education Studies; Vol. 10, No. 1

Shaker, N., Fathtabar, H. K. & Karamati, M. (2011). The relationship between study habits and academic self-efficacy and academic performance of students. Journal of Education, 15, 71-59.

Tan, L., & Koh, J. (2014). Self-directed learning: Learning in the 21st century education.

Tekkol, İ. A., & Demirel, M. (2018). An investigation of self-directed learning skills of undergraduate students. Frontiers in psychology, 2324.

Tobing, I. R. A. (2013). The relationship of reading strategies and self-efficacy with the reading comprehension of high school students in Indonesia. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas).

Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21049.

Wijayanti, Nia Wahyu & Roemintoyo, Tri Murwaningsih (2017). The Influence of Self-Learning On Natural Science Learning.

Yamin, M. (2011). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Gaung Persada.

Cite this article:

Siudad, R. & Aliazas, J. (2022). Learning readiness and level of science learning outcomes in modular distance modality. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 2(4), 39 - 53. https://doi.org/10.53378/352929