Abstract
This study was grounded on the established Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework to assess the behavior of students during the synchronous classes and its association with the Basic Science Process Skills (BSPS). The participants of the study were twenty-eight students from the seventh grade class of a public elementary school in the Philippines. The quantitative data were collected from the survey questionnaires while the pre-test and post-test were measured using a rating scale instrument facilitated via Google forms. Pearson-r was used to find the correlation among the variables while the T-test for the differences between variables. The results divided the CoI into three presences. The teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence with an acceptable mean, implies a good sense of community among the learners. Furthermore, few students’ basic science process skills were advanced and proficient, while most were still approaching proficiency and developing levels. The constructs of the CoI Framework were associated with the basic science process skills for classifying. Similarly, there is a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the respondents in classifying and measuring. The results suggest that continuous exposure of the students to CoI during synchronous classes improves their ability to self-study during asynchronous classes.
Keywords: Community of inquiry, basic science process skills, synchronous learning
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3-22.
Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Development of a community of inquiry in online and blended learning contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1834-1838.
Aliazas, J. V., Panoy, J. F., Del Rosario, A. L., & Madrideo, J. (2021). Critical Success Factors of the Flexible Learning Delivery as Organizational Innovation of One State University in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(3), 61-77.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2012). Increasing instructor visibility in online courses through mini-videos and screencasting. Online student engagement tools and strategies, 8.
Ango, M. L. (2002). Mastery of Science Process Skills and Their Effective Use in the Teaching of Science: An Educology of Science Education in the Nigerian Context. Online Submission, 16(1), 11-30
Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2), 1-21.
Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The internet and higher education, 13(1-2), 37-44.
Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), n1.
Chen, X. (2014). An integrative review of the effects of social presence on distance education (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University).
Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269-292
Cooper, T., Scriven, R. (2017). Communities of inquiry in curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths and limitations in context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 22-37.
Crossman, A. (2017). Understanding purposive sampling.
DeNoyelles, A., Mannheimer Zydney, J., & Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for creating a community of inquiry through online asynchronous discussions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(1).
Dökme, İ., & Aydınlı, E. (2009). Turkish primary school students’ performance on basic science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 544-548.
DEPED (June, 2017) Learning Strand 2 Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills
Drouin, M., & Vartanian, L. R. (2010). Students’ feelings of and desire for sense of community in face-to-face and online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(3), 147.
Ergül, R., Şımşeklı, Y., Çaliş, S., Özdılek, Z., Göçmençelebı, Ş., & Şanli, M. (2011). The effects of inquiry-based science teaching on elementary school students’ science process skills and science attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science & Education Policy, 5(1)
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135-153.
Futch, L. S., deNoyelles, A., Thompson, K., & Howard, W. (2016). “Comfort” as a Critical Success Factor in Blended Learning Courses. Online Learning, 20(3), 140-158.
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). Th e Community of Inquiry Theoretical Framework. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 122-138). Routledge.
Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Gunawardena, C., Frechette, C., & Layne, L. (2018). Culturally inclusive instructional design: A framework and guide to building online wisdom communities. Routledge.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Wu, L., & Admiraal, W. (2021). The Community of Inquiry perspective on students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1479-1493.
Hatziapostolou, T., & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 8(2), 111-122.
Hsiao, E. L. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Quarterly review of distance education, 13(1), 15.
Jézégou, A. (2010). Community of inquiry in e-learning: A critical analysis of Garrison and Anderson model. Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l’Education à Distance, 24(3), 1-18.
Jiang, M., & Koo, K. (2020). Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students. Online Learning, 24(4), 93-111.
Kabilan, M. K., & Annamalai, N. (2022). Online Teaching during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study of University Educators’ Experiences and Challenges. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 101182.
Kanuka, H., & Rourke, L. (2013). Using Blended Learning Strategies to Address Teaching Development Needs: How Does Canada Compare? Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(3), 19-35.
Lang, Q. C. (2013). Exploring beginning teachers’ attitudes and beliefs on classroom management. New Horizons in Education, 61(2).
Law, V. T., Yee, H. H., Ng, T. K., & Fong, B. Y. (2022). Transition from Traditional to Online Learning in Hong Kong Tertiary Educational Institutions During COVID-19 Pandemic. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-17.
Lowenthal, P. R. (2016). A mixed methods examination of instructor social presence in accelerated online course. In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, E. Ntuli, & C. Agyeman (Eds.), Handbook of research strategic management of interaction, presence, and participation in online courses.
Medina, M. V., & Del Rosario, A. L. (2022). Online Collaborative Learning and the Enhancement of Most Essential Learning Competencies in General Mathematics among Grade Eleven Senior High School Students. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 3(5), 55-65.
Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers and Education, 51, 1172-1183.
Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Effective Classroom Management: Teacher Preparation and Professional Development. TQ Connection Issue Paper. National comprehensive center for teacher quality.
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292.
Mahmood, S. (2021). Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID‐19 pandemic. Human behavior and emerging technologies, 3(1), 199-203.
Maranan, V. M. (2017). Basic Process Skills and Attitude toward Science: Inputs to an Enhanced Students’ Cognitive Performance. Online Submission.
Monteyne, K. (2004). Development of the formal reasoning abilities of college students in a general chemistry guided-inquiry laboratory. University of Montana.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Belmont, CA: WadsworthCengage Learning.
Moskal, P. D., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2010). Online learning: A transforming educational environment for adults in higher education. In Web-based education: concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 852-866). IGI Global
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292.
Panergayo, A. A. E., & Aliazas, J. V. C. (2021). Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Learning Management System: The Mediating Role of Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(11).
Panoy, J. F., Andrade, R., Febrer, L., & Ching, D. (2022). Perceived proficiency with technology and online learning expectations of students in the graduate program of one state university in the Philippines. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(7), 615-624.
Picciano, A. G. (2021). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. In A Guide to Administering Distance Learning (pp. 79-103). Brill.
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & education, 55(4), 1721-1731.
Stenbom, S., Hrastinski, S., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2012). Student-student online coaching as a relationship of inquiry: An exploratory study from the coach perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 37-48
Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry.
Tinapay, A., Tirol, S., Cortes, J. A., & Punay, M. (2021). Attitude of learners towards science and their science process skills in the case of the spiral curriculum: A. International Journal of Research, 10(15), 13-24.
United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organization, UNESCO (2002) Information and communication technologies in teacher education: a planning guide, UNESCO Division of Higher Education, Paris
Vaughan, N. (2010). Designing for a blended community of inquiry. T. Joutsenvirta y L. Myyry (2010) (Eds.), Blended learning in Finland, 11-29.
Wei, C. W., & Chen, N. S. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3), 529-545.
Weissman, N. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of a synchronous online environment in establishing social, cognitive, and teaching presence (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University).
Yang, Y. F., Yeh, H. C., & Wong, W. K. (2010). The influence of social interaction on meaning construction in a virtual community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 287-306.
Yildiz, N. G. (2017). Classroom management and student achievement: A study on five elementary classrooms. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 7(1), 155-183.
Zulkarnaen, Z., Supardi, Z. I., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). The role of knowledge mastery and science process skills to increase the scientific creativity. Unnes Science Education Journal, 7(2).
