Evidence-based research in public administration: A literature review on policy formulation and service delivery
Tlangelani Ngobeni, Mutshutshu Michael Nekhavhambe & Ephraim Mahole
Abstract
Research is essential in public administration, supporting evidence-based policy making and effective service delivery. Despite its significance, integrating research into governance remains inconsistent, often leading to subpar policies and limited effects on service outcomes. While previous studies have explored evidence use in policy or service delivery, few have examined how research informs both areas comprehensively, especially in the South African context. Hence, this study aims to examine evidence-based research in public administration, with a focus on its role in policy-making and service delivery. Adopting an interpretivist approach and qualitative design, the study uses desktop data from published documents relevant to the subject. Guided by the Evidence-Based Policy (EBP) framework, the review systematically combines studies from published reports and journals, providing a context-specific and integrated view not covered in earlier reviews. Content and thematic analyses identified patterns in research utilization, theoretical connections, and interpretive insights on accountability and participatory governance. Findings indicate that research enhances informed decision-making, uncovers service gaps, supports transparency and accountability, and encourages citizen participation, although political interference, limited capacity, and resource constraints limit its impact. Despite the limited availability of rigorous, up-to-date studies, the depth of this review is restricted, underscoring the need for stronger evidence to inform public sector policy and service delivery. The study recommends institutionalizing research integration, boosting capacity, and adopting participatory approaches to maximize evidence use. This review contributes to the literature by offering a comprehensive, evidence-based understanding of research’s strategic role in promoting the use of evidence in policy development and service delivery.
Keywords
research, public administration, policy-making, service delivery, decision-making, evidence-based policy, accountability and governance
Author information & Contribution
Tlangelani Ngobeni. Corresponding author. PhD, Supervisor, University of Venda. Email: ngobenitlaange@gmail.com
Mutshutshu Michael Nekhavhambe. PhD, Lecturer, University of Venda. Email: Mutshutshu.Nekhavhambe@univen.ac.za
Ephraim Mahole. PhD. Lecturer, University of Venda. Email: Ephraim.Mahole@univen.ac.za
“All authors equally contributed to the conception, design, preparation, data gathering and analysis, and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Funding
This work was not supported by any funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not Applicable
Data and Materials Availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
AI Declaration
AI Declaration The author declares the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in writing this paper. In particular, the author used Quillbot in summarizing key points and paraphrasing ideas and Grammarly, for grammar, tone, and clarity. The author takes full responsibility for ensuring proper review and editing of content generated using AI.
Notes
Acknowledgement
References
Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
Alexander, M., Culos, K., Roddy, J., Shaw, J. R., Bachmeier, C., Shigle, T. L., & Mahmoudjafari, Z. (2021). Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: A comprehensive review of clinical efficacy, toxicity, and best practices for administration. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, 27(7), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2021.01.014
Aviram, N. F., & Cohen, N. (2024). Rationality in public policy. In M. van Gerven, C. Rothmayr Allison, & K. Schubert (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public policy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_89-1
Ayoubi, F. R., & Noori, N. Z. (2025). Role and importance of comparative study of public administration. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 5(1), 12–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.1.2
Cantarelli, P., Belle, N., & Hall, J. L. (2023). Information use in public administration and policy decision-making: A research synthesis. Public Administration Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.1373
Carboni, J. L., et al. (2019). Start with the problem: Establishing research relevance with integrative public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz021
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2025). Future directions of public administration research: Addressing fundamental issues and questions. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(5–6), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2470006
Cormack, M., Boxall, A., Hullick, C., Booth, M., & Gruen, R. L. (2021). A purple patch for evidence-based health policy? Australian Health Review, 45(1), 74–76. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH21016
Department of Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation. (2014). Overview paper: What is evidence-based policy-making and implementation? Government of South Africa.
Department of Science and Innovation. (2020–2021). Annual report. Government Printers.
Grossi, G., & Argento, D. (2022). The fate of accounting for public governance development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-5001
Gupta, R. K. (2024). Methodological and theoretical rigor in desk research.
Halden, S. (2022). Importance of public administration in our society. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 11(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.35248/2319-8834/22.11.016
Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more “evidence-informed” policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24757583
Huidrom, T., & Malhi, R. (2021). Evidence-based decision making: A review. International Healthcare Research Journal, 5(7), 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.26440/IHRJ/0507.10468
Ismail, I., & Hartati, S. (2023). Trend in public administration research. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 12(1), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i1siart18
Itua, E., & Monday, O. S. (2024). Utility of quantitative research methods: Implications for public administration. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(5), 2903–2909. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-33
Juta, L., Shopola, A., & Chesa, E. (2025). Research as a public management tool for improved municipal governance in South Africa. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 7(2), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i2.804
Kelly, C., & Pande, S. (2025). Understanding the use of evidence in policymaking: Informing a new research agenda in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
Kroukamp, H. (2009). Research in public administration and management: The tool to objectivity in knowledge management. Administratio Publica, 17(1), 84–95.
Lukey, P. (2016, October 3–5). The promotion of evidence-based policy-making [Conference presentation]. 11th Annual Air Quality Governance Lekgotla, Mbombela, South Africa.
Mahima, S. (2024). A brief introduction to research methodology. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12(5), 1–20.
Matlala, L. S. (2025). Factors affecting the use of evidence in public sector programmes in South Africa: A systematic review of outcome 8 programmes. Proceedings of the Conference on Digital Government Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1024
McDonald, B. D., Hall, J. M., O’Flynn, J., & Van Thiel, S. (2022). The future of public administration research: An editor’s perspective. Public Administration, 100(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12829
Meijer, A., & Webster, W. (2025). How does research influence policy? Information Polity, 30(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255251356399
Meijer, A.J. & Ettlinger, K. (2025). Transdisciplinary public administration research: Developing and testing a model for transdisciplinary knowledge integration in the public sector. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 8(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf009
Mhlanga, D., Ndhlovu, E., & Costa Hofisi, C. (2021). Assessment of the 4IR challenges of radical innovation in service delivery in Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 56(4.1), 1002–1017.
Mthombothi, I. S. (2025). The importance of research in government. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 14(2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.35629/7722-14023443
Newman, J. (2020). Increasing the ability of government agencies to undertake evidence-informed policy-making. Evidence Base, 2, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21307/eb-2020-005
OECD. (2020). Building capacity for evidence-informed policy-making: Lessons from country experiences (OECD Public Governance Reviews). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/86331250-en
Osman, M., & Cosstick, N. (2025). Understanding UK policymakers’ evidence needs through policy questions. Scientific Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05911-3
Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge.
Pellegrini, M., & Vivanet, G. (2021). Evidence-based policies in education: Initiatives and challenges in Europe. ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120924670
Pérez-González, S. (2025). Evidence of mechanisms in evidence-based policy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 103, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.006
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2022). Bringing political science back into public administration research. Governance, 35(4), 962–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12705
Prentice, A. (1984). Research in public administration. Library Trends.
Setyarto, D. B., Suraja, Y., Hadilinatih, B., Dominata, A., & Kholiyah, S. (2022). Understanding the best practices of public administration in the era of revolution 4.0: Scientific evidence from publications. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijss.v5n4.2008
Smith-Merry, J. (2020). Evidence-based policy, knowledge from experience, and validity. Journal of Evidence and Policy, 16(2), 305–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15700265131524
Sunkad, G. (2024). Public administration: Concepts and scope. International Journal of Social Health, 3(3), 276–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.58860/ijsh.v3i3.172
Swarooprani, K. (2025). A study of research methodology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 537–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2293175
The Australian Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. (2023). Australian government guide to policy impact analysis.
Thusi, X., Ragolane, M., & Matyana, M. (2023). Innovation as a tool to improve public service delivery: South African government perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 175–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.19184/idj.v4i2.39165
Ugwu, C. N., & Eze, V. H. U. (2023). Qualitative research. IDOSR Journal of Computer and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 20–35.
United Nations. (2020). Guidelines on evidence-based policies and decision-making for sustainable housing and urban development. United Nations.
Van Thiel, S. (2021). Research methods in public administration and public management (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Wei, R., Liu, X., & Lyu, P. (2024). Bibliometrics of public administration research hotspots: Topic keywords, author keywords, keywords plus analysis. Heliyon, 10(21), e39352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39352
Wessels, J. S., & Thani, X. C. (2021). Research methods in public administration. In J. S. Wessels, J. C. Pauw, & X. C. Thani (Eds.), Reflective public administration: Context, knowledge and methods (pp. 156–178). University of South Africa. https://doi.org/10.25159/118-9.012
Widjaja, G., & Rayshan, A. R. (2023). Research methodology. RK Publications.
Zhao, Z. (2024). Research on public policy and public administration: Social research methods. Interdisciplinary Communities in Humanities Research, 46, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/46/20242319
Zida, A., Lavis, J. N., Sewankambo, N. K., Kouyate, B., & Ouedraogo, S. (2017). Evaluating the process and extent of institutionalization: A case study of a rapid response unit for health policy in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.39
Cite this article:
Ngobeni, T., Nekhavhambe, M.M. & Mahole, E. (2026). Evidence-based research in public administration: A literature review on policy formulation and service delivery. International Review of Social Sciences Research, 6(1), 156-184. https://doi.org/10.53378/irssr.353327
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Find this article in:
Related articles:
Most read articles
- Social media usage and the academic performance of Filipino junior high school students
- A narrative exploration of romantic experiences and ideal relationship standards among Filipino Gen Z
- Exploring the factors influencing commuters’ satisfaction and the use of public utility buses in Quezon City, Philippines
- Students’ exposure to social media and their radical involvement on the societal issues in the Philippines
- ChatGPT integration significantly boosts personalized learning outcomes: A Philippine study
- Tiktok made me book it: The impact of Tiktok on tourism destination selection of generation Z and millennials in Manila
- Senior high school students’ awareness and literacy on computer software applications
- Self-perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness
- Enhancing financial literacy among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program beneficiaries
- Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy of university student leaders