Institute of Industry and Academic Research Incorporated
Register in
IJSTEM Cover Page
International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics

ISSN 2799-1601 (Print) 2799-161X (Online)

English Language Proficiency and Geometric Proof Skills of Students

Winmark Bombio & Anna Liza P. Del Rosario
Volume 2 Issue 2, June 2022

Abstract

Educational reforms and curriculum development were continuously implemented for quality and inclusive education for all learners. As proficiency in English language became an issue, it has also been a burden in studying mathematics, specifically geometry, which is mainly written and taught in English Language. Hence, this study utilized descriptive correlational design in describing the students’ proficiency in English language, specifically in reading comprehension, and Geometric proof skills in terms of correctness, appropriateness, logical reasoning, and clarity. Additionally, random sampling technique was used in choosing 30 mathematics students at a state university in Laguna. The quantitative data revealed that the respondents were proficient in terms of reading comprehension. However, with the presence of socio-cultural differences, their answers were influenced by environmental interference. On the other hand, the students performed advanced level in all aspects of Geometric proof skills. It was also found out that there is a significant relationship between reading comprehension and the correctness of proof and logical reasoning. Contrary to the results of the two components of geometric proof skills, reading comprehension has no significant relationship to both appropriateness and clarity. Based from the findings, the study suggests educators expose their students to a wide variety of reading materials in enhancing geometric proof skills.

Keywords: English Language Proficiency, Geometric Proof Skills, Reading Comprehension, Mathematics

References

Adu‐Gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Lynch‐Davis, K. (2019). Three types of mathematical representational translations: Comparing empirical and theoretical results. School Science and Mathematics, 119(7), 396-404.

Adu‐Gyamfi, K., Stiff, L. V., & Bossé, M. J. (2012). Lost in translation: Examining translation errors associated with mathematical representations. School science and Mathematics, 112(3), 159-170.

Aina, J. K., Ogundele, A. G., & Olanipekun, S. S. (2013). Students’ proficiency in English language relationship with academic performance in science and technical education. American Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 355-358.

Akbasli, S., Sahin, M., & Yaykiran, Z. (2016). The Effect of Reading Comprehension on the Performance in Science and Mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 16(7), 108-121.

Andrade, R. R., & Pasia, A. E. (2020). Mathematical creativity of pre-service teachers in solving non-routine problems in State University in Laguna. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 10(8), 4555-4567.

Baful, R. D., & Derequito, C. M. (2022). English Language Apprehension and the Reading-Writing Competence of Students. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 9(2), 6782–6801.

Balacheff, N. (2008). The role of the researcher’s epistemology in mathematics education: an essay on the case of proof. ZDM, 40(3), 501-512.

Barwell, R. (2011). What works? Research into practice. A research-into practice series produced by a partnership between the Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat and the Ontario Association of Deans of Education. Research Monogram, 34, 1-4.

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639-668.

Copes, L. (2008). Tracing Proofs in Discovering Geometry. Key Crriculum Press.

Dio, R. V. (2021). Exploring vertical coherence of content topics in Philippine spiral Kto10 mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Learning, Teachingand Educational Research, 19(11).

Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L.-A. B. (2019). Research Methods for the Behavioral Science. Cengage Learning.

Gunhan, B. C. (2014). A case study on the investigation of reasoning skills in geometry. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1-19.

Henry, D. L., Baltes, B., & Nistor, N. (2014). Examining the relationship between math scores and English language proficiency. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 4(1).

Jourdain, L., & Sharma, S. (2016). Language challenges in mathematics education: A literature review. Waikato Journal of Education, 21(2), 43-56.

Krashen, S. (1981). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

Lee, J. M. (2012). Some remarkson writing mathematical proofs. Downloaded June 3, 2012.

Li, M., & Kirby, J. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 611-63.

Lin, F., & Yang, K. (2007). The reading comprehenion of geometric proofs: The contribution of knowledgeand reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(5), 729-754.

Long, M. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2016). Spatial Reasoning Influences Students’ Performance on Mathematics Tasks. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76.

Malanog, S., & Aliazas, J. (2021). Active Learning Strategies and Higher-Order Thinking Skillsof Grade 10 Students. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(2), 241-249.

Mulligan, J. (2015). ooking within and beyond the geometry curriculum: connecting spatial reasoning to mathematics learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 511-517.

Njagi, M. W. (2015). Language Issues on Mathematics Achievement. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(6), 167-178.

Onkoba, M. K. (2014). Correlation between reading comprehension practices and academic performance: A case study of class three pupils in Westlands Sub-County, Kenya. University of Nairobi.

Perez, A. L., & Alieto, E. (2018). Change of” Tongue” from English to a Local Language: A Correlation of Mother Tongue Proficiency and Mathematics Achievement. Online Submission, 14, 132-150.

Priest, D. B., Smith, R. G., Carlisle, C., & Mays, R. (2013). Delving Deeper: The Diver Problem: The Surfer Problem in 3D. The Mathematics Teacher, 106(9), 710-714.

Racca, R. M., & Lasaten, R. C. (2016). English language proficiency and academic performance of Philippine science high school students. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 2(2), 44-49.

Rambely, A. S., Ahmad, R. R., Majid, N., & Jaaman, S. H. (2013). The relationship of English proficiency and mathematics achievement. . In Recent Advances in Educational Technologies.

Sälzer, C., & Roczen, N. (2018). ssessing global competence in PISA 2018: Challenges and approaches to capturing a complex construct. International journal of development education and global learning.

Sari, D. M. (2016). The Use of Skimming and Scanning Techniques to Improve Reading Comprehension Achievement of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Edukasi, 1(2), 59-68.

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2015). Validations of proofs as a type of reading and sense-making. In Proceedings of the 39th conference of the International Group of Psychology of Mathematics Education , 145-152.

Spence, L. K. (2010). Discerning Writing Assessment: Insights into an Analytical Rubric. Language Arts, 87(5), 337.

Stoffelsma, L., & Spooren, W. (2017). Improving the academic reading proficiency of university students in Ghana: An Educational Design Research approach. Language Matters, 48(1), 48-70.

Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). Test review: college English test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25(3), 408-4017.

Cite this article:

Bombio, W. & Del Rosario, A.P. (2022). English Language Proficiency and Geometric Proof Skills of Students. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Volume 2 Issue 2, pp. 29 - 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352890

License:

ai generated, holographic, interface-8578468.jpg
library, people, study-2245807.jpg
bookshelf, books, library-2907964.jpg
Scroll to Top