ChatGPT: Towards educational technology micro-level framework

Carie Justine P. Estrellado & Glen B. Millar

Volume 3 Issue 4, December 2023

Abstract

The study explores the role of ChatGPT in the development of a micro-level framework for Educational Technology (EdTech). This study employed an inductive research design particularly a Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) approach from thirty-four private secondary high school teachers in the Philippines. To gather insights from specific participants, a semi-structured interview format was utilized. The instrument went through face validation from two experts well-versed in education research, instrumentation, and three-stage prompts. In addition, using JAMOVI software, Fleiss’ Kappa was used with a value of 0.715 indicating a substantial agreement among the expert validators. The interviews were designed to be open-ended, allowing for a flexible exploration of the research topic then subjected for data analysis with the aid of QDA Miner lite software. The findings revealed three (3) distinct milieux: pedagogical support, professional development, and ethical sense. In the (a) pedagogical support milieu, ChatGPT emerges as a virtual compass, offering real-time assistance, explanations, and guidance for teachers. It demonstrates the capability to answer questions, clarify concepts, and provide step-by-step support, crafted to individual students' needs and learning styles; within the (b) redesigning milieu, it serves as a catalyst for adapting and recalibrating assessment and teaching strategies to suit learning purpose; and (c) ethical sense milieu highlights various implications, including data privacy, plagiarism, transparency, accountability, and overly reliant to the AI tool. Thus, this paper offers a micro-level framework anchored to the ChatGPT’s role in EdTech and aims to stimulate further scholarly discourse in the field.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Disclosure statement

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

AI Declaration

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Amir T. & Beaudry C. (2023) An emergent grounded theory of AI-driven digital transformation: Canadian SMEs’ perspectives. Industry and Innovation, 30:9, 1244-1273, DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2023.2242285

Andriole, S. J. (2020). Innovation, emerging technology, and digital transformation. IT Professional 22 (4): 69–72, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2020.2985491

Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. The University of Rhode Island. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1547&context=cba_facpubs

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.

Bereiter, C. (2017). Theory Building and Education for Understanding. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_370

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Cain, C.C., Buskey, C.D. and Washington, G.J. (2023). Artificial intelligence and conversational agent evolution – a cautionary tale of the benefits and pitfalls of advanced technology in education, academic research, and practice. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2023-0019

Charmaz K., & Keller R. (2016). A personal journey with grounded theory methodology. Forum Qual Soc Res.17(1): https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.1.2541

Chong, C., & Yeo, K. (2015). An overview of grounded theory design in educational research. Asian Social Science, 11(12), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n12p258

Cronholm, S., & Remenyi, D. (2002). Grounded theory in use: A review of experiences. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (ECRM 2002. Presented at the First European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (ECRM 2002) (Remenyi D, ed), Reading, UK, Apr 29-30, 2002.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications.

Duha, M. S. U. (2023). ChatGPT in education: An opportunity or a challenge for the future? TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00844-y

Elsayed, S. (2023). Towards mitigating ChatGPT’s negative impact on education: Optimizing question design through bloom’s taxonomy. In 2023 IEEE region 10 symposium (TENSYMP) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/TENSYMP55890.2023.10223662

El-Seoud, S., Shehab Eldeen, A., Khaled, N., & Karam, O. H. (2023, August 6). The impact of ChatGPT on student learning/performing. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4532913.

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59, 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Estrellado, C. J. P., & Miranda, J. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the Philippine educational context: Circumspection and future inquiries. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(5), 16. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.13.04.2023.p13704

Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of artificial intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or panic? Education in Knowledge Society, 24. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers.

Greitemeyer, T., & Kastenmüller, A. (2023). HEXACO, the Dark Triad, and Chat GPT: Who is willing to commit academic cheating? Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19909

Hallberg, L. (2006). The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620600858399

Haluza, D. & Jungwirth, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence and ten societal megatrends: An exploratory study using GPT-3. Systems, 11, 120.

Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary M.A.Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45, 83–106.

Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, N.-S. (2023). Editorial position paper: Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in education: Applications, challenges, and future research directions. Educational Technology & Society, 26(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/48720991

Ibrahim, H., Asim, R., Zaffar, F., Rahwan, T., & Zaki, Y. (2023). Rethinking homework in the age of artificial intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 38(2), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2023.3255599

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. Bench Council Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Karpouza, E., & Emvalotis, A. (2019). Exploring the teacher-student relationship in graduate education: A constructivist grounded theory. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1468319

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Lund, B.D. & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009

Magana, S. (2020). Disruptive classroom technologies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.423

Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022.

Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. In: FinTech and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37776-1_17

Mirrlees, T. & Alvi, S. (2019). EdTech Inc.: Selling, Automating and Globalizing Higher Education in the Digital Age (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429343940

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

Neumann, M., Rauschenberger, M., & Sch¨on, E.-M. (2023). We need to talk about ChatGPT: The future of AI and higher education. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 5th international workshop on software engineering education for the next generation (SEENG) (pp. 29–32). https://doi.org/10.1109/SEENG59157.2023.00010

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Okonkwo, W.C., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., 2, 100033.

OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt [accessed 2023-05-28]

Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijresmar.2023.03.001

Pérez, J.Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J.M. (2020). Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28, 1549 – 1565.

Qasem, F. (2023). ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: future fears and reassurances. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 30-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2023-0043

Rahman MM, Watanobe Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences; 13(9):5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783

Reiss, M. J. (2021). The use of AI in education: Practicalities and ethical considerations. London Review of Education, 19(1), 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.05

Rivard, S. (2021). Theory building is neither an art nor a science. It is a craft. Journal of Information Technology, 36(3), 316-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220911938

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023) ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1).

Rummel, N., Walker, E., & Aleven, V. (2016). Different futures of adaptive collaborative learning support. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 784–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0102-3

Seaba, V.E.S. (2023) Revolutionizing education: Exploring the potential of AI-enabled brain-based learning for enhanced cognitive development. Open Access Library Journal, 10, 1-20. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1110763

Selwyn, N. (2012). Education in a digital world: Global perspectives on technology and education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108178

Simone Grassini, (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences. 2023; 13(7):692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023, March 6). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4378735

Srinivasa, K. G., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022). Harnessing the power of AI to education. In Learning, Teaching, and Assessment Methods for Contemporary Learners (pp. 311-342). Springer, Singapore.

Thornberg, K., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 153–169). SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n11

Tiwari, C.K., Bhat, M.A., Khan, S.T., Subramaniam, R. and Khan, M.A.I. (2023). What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2023-0061

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N. & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 5998-6008.

Zhai Xi, (2023). ChatGPT and AI: The game changer for education. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4389098

Zhai, X., & Pellegrino, J. (2023). Large-scale assessment in science education. In N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, 3, 1045-1098).

Cite this article:

Estrellado, C.P. & Millar, G.B. (2023). ChatGPT: Towards educational technology micro-level framework. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 3 (4), 101-127. https://doi.org/10.53378/353035