Framing cancel culture on social media among Filipinos

Chen Chen Silva, Micaella Mae C. Jocosol, Ashley Jane F. Merene & Ronalyn A. Ramos

Volume 6 Issue 1 June 2026

PDF

https://doi.org/10.53378/trp.222

About this Journal

Journal Issue

Submit Paper

Abstract

This study employed a qualitative research design using content analysis guided by Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to examine cancel culture on social media by exploring the recurring buzzwords, framing approaches, and comment patterns found in cancellation-related posts on Facebook and X. Specifically, it analyzed common expressions such as “cancel,” “call-out,” and “boycott,” and identified whether posts were framed through logical reasoning or ad hominem attacks. Using purposive sampling, the study selected 60 high-engagement posts based on the presence of cancellation-related language, direct references to individuals or groups, and active audience interaction through comments, reactions, or reposts. The posts were categorized into social media influencers, celebrities, and politically-related issues. Findings showed that influencer-related posts on Facebook commonly used the term “call-out,” while “boycott” and “stupid” appeared more frequently on X. Facebook posts were generally framed through logical reasoning, whereas X posts relied more on ad hominem attacks. Similar patterns emerged in celebrity-related posts, with Facebook promoting explanation-based discussions and X containing more insults, sarcasm, and personal attacks. Politically-related posts on both platforms were predominantly framed through ad hominem approaches. Comment patterns also differed, as Facebook users more often expressed logical arguments and agreement, while X users frequently engaged in ridicule, sarcasm, and insults. Facebook generally facilitates more discussion-oriented and explanation-based forms of cancellation, whereas X encourages faster, more emotional, and more personal forms of public condemnation. The study showed that cancel culture among Filipino social media users is shaped by language, framing strategies, and platform-specific dynamics.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Chen Chen Silva. Bachelor of Arts in Communication student, Calayan Educational Foundation, Inc.

Micaella Mae C. Jocosol. Bachelor of Arts in Communication student, Calayan Educational Foundation, Inc.

Ashley Jane F. Merene. Bachelor of Arts in Communication student, Calayan Educational Foundation, Inc.

Ronalyn A. Ramos. Corresponding author. Program chair of Bachelor of Arts in Communication, Calayan Educational Foundation, Inc. Email: ronalyn.ramos@cefi.edu.ph

"All authors equally contributed to the conception, design, preparation, data gathering, analysis, and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript."

Disclosure statement

Funding

Declaration

The authors declare the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in writing this paper. In particular, the author used ChatGPT in translating into English and phrasing the introduction, literature review, discussion of results, and conclusions, which were drafted using a mix of English and Tagalog, and compiling bibliography into APA 7 format. The authors take full responsibility in ensuring proper review and editing of contents generated using AI.

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Adeyemi, V. (2025). The psychological impact of cancel culture: Anxiety, social isolation, and self-censorship. Premier Journal of Psychology, 2, 100005.

Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447

Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical reasoning in formal and everyday reasoning tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 1673–1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10039-8

Demsar, V., Ferraro, C., Nguyen, J., & Sands, S. (2023). Calling for cancellation: Understanding how markets are shaped to realign with prevailing societal values. Journal of Macromarketing, 43(3), 322–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146723116887

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Exala, L. M., dela Cruz, J. P., Santos, R. A., & Villanueva, K. T. (2023). Social media landscape and cancel culture: Insights from college students. SSRN.

Jaafar, G. B., & Herna, H. (2024). The impact of media in cancel culture phenomenon. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(2), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v8i2.893

Jusay, J. P., Ramos, M. L., & Cruz, A. D. (2022). We are cancelled: Exploring victims’ experiences of cancel culture on social media in the Philippines. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 14(4). https://rupkatha.com/V14/n4/v14n404.pdf

Kintu, B., & Ben-Slimane, K. (2020). Companies’ responses to scandal backlash caused by social media influencers. International Journal of Market Research, 62(6), 666–672.

Lovitos, J. R. (2025). Philippine political hashtags: A critical discourse analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. https://ejournals.ph

Ng, E. (2020). No grand pronouncements here…: Reflections on cancel culture and digital media participation. Television & New Media, 21(6), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420918828

Norris, P. (2021). Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies, 71(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023

Palomares, M. C. (2022). A case study on the experiences of “called out” persons in social media. International Journal of Academic Social Science Education, 3(2), 45–58.

Picarella, L. (2024). Intersections in the digital society: Cancel culture, fake news, and contemporary public discourse. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1376049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1376049

Rahman, S. M. M. (2024). Sociolinguistic implications of cancel culture: The prose of language, power and social dynamics in digital spaces. British Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6(5), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.34104/bjah.02403170324

Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307500336

Roldan, C. J. L., Ong, A. K. S., & Tomas, D. Q. (2024). Cancel culture in a developing country: A belief in a just world behavioral analysis among Generation Z. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104378

Roldan, R. S., Garcia, M. E., & Lim, J. A. (2024). Cancel culture in a developing country: A belief in a just world and theory of planned behavior approach among Generation Z. Personality and Individual Differences, 220, 112497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112497

Traversa, M., Tian, Y., & Wright, S. C. (2023). Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181872

UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies. (2023). Cancel culture and political polarization: Implications for voter education. University of the Philippines. https://cids.up.edu.ph

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Principles of critical discourse analysis. In Discourse studies (pp. 249–283). Sage.

Walton, D. (1998). Ad hominem arguments. University of Alabama Press.

Wong, R. S. (2022). Revisiting cancel culture. Contexts, 21(4), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/153650422211310

Yanti, N. (2024). Cancel culture and its social effects in digital environments. Journal of Social Studies, 19(1), 23–37.

Zembylas, M. (2024). The phenomenon of cancel culture through social media: Pedagogical implications for teacher education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 32(5), 1495–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2202192

Cite this article:

Silva, C., Jocosol, M.C., Merene, A.J.F. & Ramos, R.A. (2026). Framing cancel culture on social media among Filipinos. The Research Probe, 6(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.53378/trp.222