The purpose of this study was to describe the lived experiences, challenges, and insights of teachers in an elementary school in the District of Pandan, Division of Antique which were the basis of the proposed intervention program for teachers. On the other hand, the phenomenology research design was used in this study. The study utilized five elementary teachers as research participants. The data was analyzed and interpreted using the thematic analysis of Collaizzi’s method. The research instrument used was in the form of the interview guide. The teachers' lived experiences with home visitation highlight three key themes: teacher's commitment and mission, student's struggles, and school-family connectedness. The home visitation challenges highlight three main themes: geographical problems, seasonal labor-dependent students, and personal safety. Support systems to address these challenges in home visitation programs. The study documents teachers' insights in home visitation to improve academic performance. It identifies three key themes: innovation in teaching, conferencing, and parental involvement. The proposed intervention program was the Educational Empowerment for All (EEFA) Program.
phenomenology, lived experiences, challenges, coping mechanisms, home visitation
This paper is presented in 5th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Industry and Academic Research (ICMIAR)
Abalos, J. B. (2017). Divorce and separation in the Philippines: Trends and correlates. Demographic Research, 36(50), 1515-1548. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.50
Aguanta, E., & Tan, D. A. (2018). Effects of Dyad cooperative learning strategy on mathematics performance and attitude of students towards mathematics. International Journal of English and Education, 7(3), 303-313.
Andamon, J., & Tan, D. A. (2018). Conceptual understanding, attitude and performance in mathematics of grade 7 students. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(8), 96-105.
Annual Poverty Indicators Survey (2008). Characteristics of poor families in the Philippines.
Asparin, A.A., & Tan, D.A. (2018). students’ problem-solving skills in enhanced gradual release of responsibility instruction model. Asian Academic Research Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(3), 121-128.
Bahçeli-Kahraman, P., & Taner-Derman, M. (2015). The views of primary and preschool education teachers about home visiting: A study in Turkey. The Online Journal of Counselling and Education, 1(3), 107-117.
Barela, R.N., Bernardino, H.P., Ana, V.M., Feliciano, A.C., & Averion, R.F. (2018). Conceptions of students at risk on behavior modification program create: A story of one public school in the Philippines. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 1010-1028.
Bendijo, A. B. (2020). New normal: How parents embrace the challenges in education. DepEd Malaybalay Division Article.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burch, G.F., Heller, N.A., Burch, J.J., Freed, R., & Steed, S.A. (2015). Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. J. Educ. Bus. 90, 224–229.
Duenas, E. (2014). Can teachers visiting students at home change education? http://www.care2.com/causes/can-teachers-visiting-students-at-home-change-education.html
Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Francisco, I.M. (2020). Back to school during the COVID-19 pandemic: How are parents coping with virtual learning? Tatler Philippines Article.
Gestwicki, C. (2007). Home, school, and community relations (6th ed.). New York: Thomson.
Gestwicki, C. (2015). Home, school, and community relations. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Kilgore, E. (2015). Teacher home visits: The importance of sharing a meal. https://www.edweek.org/
Sheldon, S.B., & Jung, S.B. (2015). The family engagement partnership student outcome evaluation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships.
Sheldon, S. & Jung, S.B. (2018). Student outcomes and parent teacher home visits. Center on School, Family, & Community Partnerships, Johns Hopkins University.
Stetson, R., Stetson, E., Sinclair, B., & Nix, K. (2014). Home visits: Teacher reflections about relationships, student behavior, and achievement. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 21–37.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watt, H.M.G., Richardson, P.W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 791–805.
Maenah Faith T. Alonsagay. Corresponding author. 1Master of Arts in Education major in English, Teacher I, Tabay Elementary School, Patria, Pandan, Antique,5712 Philippines. Email: maenahfaith.alonsagay0@gmail.com
Sergio F. Tolentino. Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor II, Aklan State University, Kalibo, Aklan, 5600 Philippines.
Cite this article:
Alonsagay, M.F.T. & Tolentino, S.F. (2024). Inside the homes, beyond the classroom: Teacher’s home visitation experiences. Industry and Academic Research Review, 5(1), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.53378/iarr.924.123
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
