This research evaluates the productivity of Department of Education personnel in a hybrid work environment using Civil Service Commission regulations on flexible work arrangements. The study, which was conducted in Makato's Aklan District, used a descriptive-correlational strategy that included questionnaires and statistical analysis. The results show a primarily young workforce with different educational backgrounds and tenures, demonstrating adaptation to hybrid work patterns. Productivity in terms of speed, work quality, and target attainment is very high, indicating the hybrid setup's success. Influential elements like supervision and work-life balance have a favorable influence on productivity. There is a considerable positive association between production levels and the affecting factors. Recommendations include continuously improving the hybrid work program, addressing gender and educational inequities, resolving personal time issues, and implementing open performance review methods to ensure long-term success. Efforts should be directed at increasing inclusivity, providing support structures, and guaranteeing long-term program viability. This study's findings have major implications for the future of hybrid work settings. The findings indicate that hybrid work may sustain high production levels, which may impact governmental decisions about flexible work arrangements. Addressing observed differences and providing transparent performance evaluations may result in more fair and successful work environments. The report also emphasizes the significance of support structures and inclusion in keeping employees productive and satisfied. By concentrating on these areas, organizations may better assist their employees and maintain long-term success in hybrid work programs.
productivity, department of education, hybrid work environment, civil service commission, flexible work arrangements, workforce, sustainability
This paper is presented in 5th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Industry and Academic Research (ICMIAR)-2024
Abendroth, A., & Reimann, M. (2018). Telework and work-family conflict across workplaces: Investigating the implications of work-family-supportive and high-demand workplace cultures. In J. Obradović & S. L. Blair (Eds.), The work-family interface: Spillover, complications, and challenges. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68.
Alton, L. (2017, March 7). Are remote workers more productive than in-office workers? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/larryalton/2017/03/07/are-remote-workers-more-productive-than-in-office-workers/#7de7919131f6
Anderson, A. J., Kaplan, S. A., & Vega, R. P. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.966086
Ansong, E., & Boateng, R. (2018). Organizational adoption of telecommuting: Evidence from a developing country. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12008
Aoertega, A. (2017). Stress management technique of selected car and real estate companies: A comparative study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Colegio de San Juan de Letran.
Arlinghaus, A., & Nachreiner, F. (2014). Health effects of supplemental work from home in the European Union. Chronobiology International, 31(10), 1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.957297
Asgari, H., Jin, X., & Du, Y. (2016). Examination of the impacts of telecommuting on the time use of nonmandatory activities. Transportation Research Record, 2566, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2566-09
Austin, M. (2017). Occupational stress and coping mechanisms as perceived by the directors of adult literacy educational programs in Texas (Unpublished master’s thesis). Texas A&M University.
Australian Public Service Commission. (n.d.). Teleworking. Australian Public Service Commission. https://www.apsc.gov.au/teleworking
Beauregard, A., Basile, K., & Canonico, E. (2013). Home is where the work is: A new study of homeworking in Acas—and beyond. Acas, London.
Beekmann, M. (2016). Working-time autonomy as a management practice: Giving workers control over their working hours increases their commitment and benefits from performance. IZA World of Labor, 230, 1–10.
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. (2014). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 165–218.
Bureau of Working Conditions. (2019, March). Implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act No. 11165 otherwise known as the “Telecommuting Act.” Bureau of Working Conditions. http://bwc.dole.gov.ph/flexible-work-arrangement
Choi, E. (2019, May). Working from home benefits both employees and employers. Highlander News. https://www.highlandernews.org/36326/working-from-home-benefits-both-employees-and-employers/
Dewa, C., et al. (2017). Relationship between job stress and worker perceived responsibilities and job characteristics. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 30–31.
Disini & Disini Law Office. (2019). An overview of the new Telecommuting Act (Work from Home Law). Elegal. https://elegal.ph/an-overview-of-the-new-telecommuting-act-hybrid-work-environment-law/
Eurofound and International Labour Office. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Publications Office of the European Union.
Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being, and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12111
Fields, J. (2018). How working from home saves your company money. Lifesize Channel. https://www.lifesize.com/en/video-conferencing-blog/how-working-from-home-saves-your-company-money
Fisher, K. (2011). The distance manager: A hands-on guide to managing off-site employees and virtual teams. McGraw-Hill.
Gajendran, R. (2017). Unlocking the promise of telecommuting. Business Today, 26(1), 190–192.
Haapakangas, A., Hallman, D. M., Mathiassen, S. E., & Jahncke, H. (2018). Self-rated productivity and employee well-being in activity-based offices: The role of environmental perceptions and workspace use. Building and Environment, 145, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.017
Hamidreza, A., Jin, X., & Rojas, M. B. (2019). The impacts of telecommuting on the time-space distribution of daily activities. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.
Hamilton, C. (2016). Telecommuting. Personnel Journal, 91–101.
Heathfield, S. M. (2019). The pros and cons of a flexible work schedule. The Balance. https://www.thebalancecareers.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-flexible-work-schedules-1917964
Hickman, A., & Robison, J. (2019). Is working remotely effective? Gallup research says yes. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/283985/working-remotely-effective-gallup-research-says-yes.aspx
Hynes, M. (2014). Telework isn’t working: A policy review. The Economic and Social Review, 45(4), 579–602.
Institution of Occupational Safety and Health. (2014). Home office, mobile office: Managing remote working. IOSH. https://www.iosh.com/media/1507/iosh-home-office-mobile-office-full-report-2014.pdf
Janzer, C. (2018). Working remotely pros and cons: Should you allow your employees to work from home? Zenefits. https://www.zenefits.com/workest/pros-cons-hybrid-work-environment/
Johnson, C. (2015, September 22). 20 reasons to let your employees work from home. Entrepreneur. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/253896
Lazar, I., Osoian, C., & Ratiu, P. (2010). The role of work-life balance practices in order to improve organizational performance. European Research Studies, 8(1), 201–214.
Lopez, E. C. (2019, March 26). 9 out of 10 Filipinos now want jobs that offer a ‘Work from Home’ scheme. Esquire Magazine. https://www.esquiremag.ph/money/industry/iwg-global-workplace-survey-a00290-20190326
Ma, L., & Ye, R. (2019). Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity? Journal of Transport Geography, 76, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.008
Madarang, C. R. S. (2019, January 14). The pros and cons of telecommuting or the hybrid work environment arrangement in the Philippines. Interaksyon. https://www.interaksyon.com/politics-issues/2019/01/14/142134/the-pros-and-cons-of-telecommuting-or-the-hybrid-work-environment
Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-07-2017-0172
Maybelyn D. Tabanera. Master in Public Administration, Administrative Officer II, Northwestern Visayan Colleges
Cite this article:
Tabanera, M.D. (2024). Productivity in a hybrid work environment. The Research Probe, 4(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.53378/trp.1224.134
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
