Abstract
The study aimed to explore the challenges, best practices, attitudes, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of utilizing integrative performance task assessment in the district of Malay. The research design employed was qualitative phenomenological. The findings of the study indicate that most of the teachers followed and implemented the new assessment given by the Department of Education, which shows their willingness to adopt innovations in education. Overall, the findings of this study suggested that integrative performance task assessment is a valuable approach in enhancing students’ learning outcomes. The challenges encountered in implementing this approach can be addressed by creating a collaborative system among teachers. The best practices identified can also serve as a guide in implementing integrative assessments effectively. The perceived advantages of learners in using this approach can be considered in creating a curriculum innovation program that promotes students’ holistic development. Based on these findings, it is recommended that the Department of Education should continue to promote the use of integrative performance task assessment in the curriculum. Teachers should also be provided with training and support in planning and implementing integrative assessments effectively. The implementation of a collaborative system among teachers can also help address the challenges encountered in implementing this approach.
Keywords: Challenges, Best Practices, Advantage, Advantages, Assessment tool
*This paper is presented at the 4th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Industry and Academic Research (ICMIAR) 2023
References
Bamber, V., Trowler, P., Sanders, M. & Knight, P. (2013). Enhancing Learning, Teaching, Assessment and Curriculum in Higher Education: Theory, Cases, Practices. Maidenhead & New York: Open University Press.
Banta, T. W., Jones, E. A., & Black, K. E. (Eds.) (2015). Designing effective assessment: Principles and profiles of good practice. San Francisco:
Biggs, J. (2016). Assessment and classroom learning: A role for summative assessment? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 103-110.
Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 9-25). London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: Sage Publications.
Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (2012). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan Online Article.
Boud, D. and Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 400-413
Boud, D. (2016). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education, retrieved on June 2014 from http://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Assessment2020_propositions_final.pdf
Boud, D. (2016). How can practice reshape assessment? In J. Gordon (Ed.), Assessment, Learning and Judgment in Higher Education (pp. 29-43). Dordrecht & London: Springer.
Brookhart, S. (2017). How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Brookhart, S., & Nitko, A. (2018). Educational Assessment of Students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Brown, S. & Glasner, A. (Eds.) (2012). Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Buckingham & Philadelphia: SRHE & Open University Press.
Brown, S. (2013). Institutional strategies for assessment. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. (pp. 3-13). Buckingham & Philadelphia: SRHE & Open University Press. Bryan, C. & Clegg, K. (Eds.) (2006). Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. London; New York: Routledge
Carless, D., Joughin, G., and Mok, M. (2012): Learning‐oriented assessment: Principles and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 395-398
Crisp, G. T. (2017). Integrative assessment: Reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, iFirst Article.
Darling-Hammond, L. and Snyder, J. (2013). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523-545.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the Bubble Test: How Performance Assessments Support 21st Century Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2020. Adoption of the Basic Education Leaming Continuity Plan (BE-LCP) for School Year (SY) 2020- 2021 in light of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Gardner, J. (Ed.). (2015). Assessment and Learning. London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: Sage Publications.
Gibbs, G. (2016). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 23-36). London & New York: Routledge.
Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2015). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 1-31.
Hartley, P. and Whitfield, R. (2012). Programme Assessment Strategies (PASS) final report, Higher Education Academy. https://www.brad.ac.uk/pass/about/PASS_final_report.pdf
Hofman, P., Goodwin, B., & Kahl, S. (2015). Re-balancing assessment: Placing formative and performance assessment at the heart of learning and accountability. Denver, CO: McREL International.
Jessop, T. and Tomas, C. (2017). The implications of programme assessment patterns for student learning. Assessment and evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 990-999
Knight, P. T. and Yorke, M. (2012). Assessment, Learning and Employability, Maidenhead, OU Press
Knight, P. (2012). The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 435-452.
Lane, S., & Stone, C. (2006). Performance Assessment. In (ED.) Brennan, R., Educational Measurement. Westport, CT: Prager
Lambert, D. & Lines, D. (2014). Understanding Assessment: Purposes, Perceptions, and Practices. London & New York: Routledge .
Leathwood, C. (2013). Assessment policy and practice in higher education: Purpose, standards and equity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 307-324.
