Community of Practice and Themes of School Learning Action Cell Towards Better Teachers’ Performances
Mary Grace P. Aclan & Delon A. Ching
Abstract
School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) must be planned and implemented in accordance with the Department of Education's call for schools to continuously provide professional community of practice that would empower teachers and make them more productive teachers in front of their students. The study sought to determine the perceived observance of the SLAC Community of Practice and the usefulness of SLAC Themes. A descriptive correlational strategy was used in this investigation. The data was gathered using an online survey questionnaire created by the researcher. According to the findings, the SLAC community of practice was highly observed in terms of collaborative planning, problem-solving, and action implementation by the majority of respondents. Similarly, respondents' average perceptions of SLAC themes' usefulness in terms of learner inclusivity, subject components and competencies, curriculum assessment, 21st-century skills and ICT integration, and curriculum contextualization, localization, and indigenization revealed that SLAC is very useful. After attending SLAC for several sessions, the teacher's performance was deemed outstanding in the areas of content knowledge and pedagogy, learning environment, diversity of learners, curriculum and planning, assessment and reporting, community linkages, and professional growth and professional development. A significant association was found between the SLAC community of practice and teacher performance. The association of SLAC themes to the teacher's performance yielded the same result.
Keywords
School Learning Action Cell, Community of Practice, SLAC Themes, Teachers Performance
Author information & Contribution
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Funding
This work was not supported by any funding.
Declaration
Notes
This paper is presented in 2nd International Research Competition 2022
Acknowledgement
References
Ahmed, N., & Malik, B. (2019). Impact of psychological empowerment on job performance of teachers: Mediating role of psychological well-being. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 5(3), 451-460.
Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 655-673.
Ali, L. (2018). The Design of Curriculum, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education with Constructive Alignment. Journal of Education and e-learning Research, 5(1), 72-78.
Banks, T. (2014). Creating positive learning environments: Antecedent strategies for managing the classroom environment & student behavior. Creative Education, 2014.
Barnes, M., & Schmitz, P. (2016). Community engagement matters (now more than ever). Stanford Social Innovation Review, 14(2), 32-39.
Blecker, N. S., & Boakes, N. J. (2010). Creating a learning environment for all children: are teachers able and willing? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(5), 435-447.
Clapper, T. C. (2010). Creating the safe learning environment. Pailal, 3(2), 1-6
Delsa, D., Chalchisa, C. & Lemma, G. (2013). School-based continuous Teacher Professional Development in Addis Ababa: An Investigation of Practices, Opportunities and Challenges. CICE Hiroshima University, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, Vol.15 No.3 (2013) pp.77～94
Deng, Z. (2010). Curriculum planning and systems change. International encyclopedia of education, 1, 384-389.
DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016
DepEd RPMS Manual 2018
Donnelly, V., & Watkins, A. (2011). Teacher education for inclusion in Europe. Prospects, 41(3), 341-353.
Elmore, R. F. (2012). Bridging the gap between standard and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Retrieved from http://www.ashankerinst.org/Downloads/BridgingGap.pdf(Accessed August 12, 2008).
George, S. A. & Scott, B. W. (2012). Managing Human Resource, 16th Edition.
Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129-139.
Gumban, H. F., & Pelones, M. T. P. (2021). School Learning Action Cell: Examining Links of a Lesson Study with Work Performance of Teachers. ASEAN Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 7.
Hammond, L. (2017) Effective Teacher Professional Development.
Infande, A. (2015). The Four Basic steps in the Training Process, Kindle Edition
Jimenez-Silva, M., & Olson, K. (2012). A community of practice in teacher education: Insights and perceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 335-348.
Kazmi, S.F., Pervez,T., Mumtaz, S. (2011). In-Service Teacher Training in Pakistan Schools and Total Quality Management, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, March Edition 2011.
Little, J. W. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teaching learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 22–46). London: Routledge.
Loughran, J. (2013). Pedagogy: Making sense of the complex relationship between teaching and learning. Curriculum inquiry, 43(1), 118-141.
Mam, R. M. G., Domantay, G. F., & Rosals, J. (2017). Contextualized and Localized Teaching as a Technique in Teaching Basic Statistics.
Marquez, E., & Garcia, S. (2019). Creating a Learning Environment that Engages Engineering Students in the Classroom via Communication Strategies. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Mwamba, P. (2016). An evaluation of the performance of inclusive education programme in Kalulushi District (Doctoral dissertation, University of Zambia).
Osamwonyi, E. (2016). In-Service Education of Teachers: Overview, Problems and the Way Forward. Journal of Education and Practice, p.83.
Perevoshchikova, E. N., Samoilova, G. S., Lapin, N. I., Elizarova, E. Y., & Panova, I. V. (2019). The methodology for developing professional competencies of bachelors in the program. Pedagogical Education. Revista Espacios, 40(33), 26.
Powell, R. G., & Powell, D. L. (2015). Classroom communication and diversity: Enhancing instructional practice. Routledge.
Ridden, P., & Heldsinger, S. (2014). What teachers need to know about assessment and reporting. ACER Press.
Rimpola, R. C. (2014). Collaborative Planning and Teacher Efficacy Of High School Mathematics Co-teachers. Educational Planning, 21(3), 41-53
Salomaki, U., Ruokonen, I., & Ruismäki, H. (2012). Educators’ professional and personal growth: A case study of European teachers’ in-service training courses. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(1), 20
Schleifer, D., Rinehart, C., & Yanisch, T. (2017). Teacher Collaboration in Perspective: A Guide to Research. Public Agenda.
Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Almerich, G., Orellana, N., & Díaz-García, I. (2018). A basic model of integration of ICT by teachers: competence and use. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1165-1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9591-0
Tavakoli T. (2010). Evaluating the need for in-service training courses in human resource management. Electronic Journal of Libraries and Museums. Volume One, Number Four, pp. 1-5.
Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of computer assisted learning, 29(2), 109-121
Wenglinsky, H. (2012). How schools matters: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (12), 13-17.
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565-568
Zuljan, M. V., Zuljan, D., & Pavlin, S. (2011). Towards improvements in teachers’ professional development through the reflective learning paradigm–the case of Slovenia. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(41).
Cite this article:
Aclan, M.P. & Ching, D.A. (2022). Community of Practice and Themes of School Learning Action Cell Towards Better Teachers’ Performances. The Research Probe, Volume 2 Issue 2, pp. 138 - 145.
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Find this article in:
Most read articles in this journal
- Senior High School Strand Alignment and Its Implication to The Tertiary Programs: A Basis for Bridging Program
- Difficulties in the writing skills of Grade 11 HUMSS students
- Identifying gender stereotypes of high school LGBTQ students
- Lived experiences of senior high school focal persons in the implementation of work immersion program
- Humor as a Teaching and Learning Strategy in a Language Classroom
- Digital Marketing Strategies Used by Competing Coffee Shops in Candelaria, Quezon: Perspective of Employees
- Meme-ingful visual: Exploring the pragmatic implications of memes in political polarization through semiotic analysis
- Awareness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence–based learning among higher education students
- Coping with stigma: Factors and experiences influencing millennial individuals’ decision to remain child-free
- Shaping futures: A qualitative exploration of the factors influencing career aspiration among out-of-school youth