This study examines the incomplete norms in Article 210 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, which caps grants at one-third of total assets but lacks provisions on the legal consequences of exceeding this limit. This ambiguity creates a conflict between justice and legal certainty, particularly when grant annulment lawsuits arise after a long period and encounter expiration exceptions. In this case, there is a contradiction between the legal objective of providing certainty and justice, whether priority should be given to annulling grants that exceed the prescribed limit or to legal certainty regarding the time limit for filing lawsuits. The goal of this research is to delve into the idea of expiration in grants that surpass one-third, focusing on the principles of legal clarity and fairness. The study utilized a normative juridical research method, focusing on statutory and conceptual analysis. The results of the investigation indicate that Article 210 of the Compilation of Islamic Law does not fully address the outcomes of grants surpassing one-third. Furthermore, when an exception of expiration is raised in a grant lawsuit, the study argues that the case should not be immediately declared inadmissible (N.O.). Instead, the court must first examine whether the plaintiff was aware of the grant. If it is proven that the grant was only recently discovered, the claim should be accepted to achieve justice for the heirs. Likewise, Article 210's regulation on grants should be refined to explicitly define the legal consequences of exceeding the one-third limit, thereby ensuring legal certainty.
exception, expiration, grant exceeding one-third, justice, legal certainty
Nadzirotus Sintya Falady. Corresponding author. Brawijaya University, Indonesia. Email: sintyafalady@gmail.com
Iwan Permadi. Brawijaya University, Indonesia.
M. Hamidi Masykur. Brawijaya University, Indonesia.
"Nadzirotus Sintya Falady conceptualized and finalized the research framework. Iwan Permadi, drafted and revised the manuscript. M. Hamidi Masykur, analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the final version of the manuscript."
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
This work was not supported by any funding.
Not Applicable
AI tools were not used in writing this paper.
Adha, M., Mas’ari, A., & Harlina, Y. (2025). Analisis hukum Islam terhadap penarikan kembali hibah oleh ahli waris: Studi di Desa Ujung Gading, Kecamatan Lembah Melintang, Kabupaten Pasaman Barat. Journal of Sharia and Law, 3(3), 976–990. https://doi.org/10.1234001/jsl.v3i3.3001
Aji, A. M., & Mukri, S. G. (2022). Implementasi maqashid syariah dan aktualisasinya dalam pengembangan sistem ekonomi Islam. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(4), 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i4.27108
Asshiddiqie, J. (2022). Peradilan etik dan etika konstitusi: Perspektif baru tentang rule of law and rule of ethics & constitutional law and constitutional ethics (Edisi Revisi). Sinar Grafika.
Astuti, W. N., & Nofitasari, K. D. (2023). Perlindungan hak waris anak adopsi: Studi komparasi fikih mawaris dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jurnal Antologi Hukum, 3(2), 235–250.
Atqiya, A. N., Nasoha, A. M. M., Khoiriyah, A. N., Naufalianto, A. T., & Hakim, F. A. (2024). Analisis komparatif antara hukum nasional dan hukum Islam. Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(4), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v1i4.297
Budiono, E., Mukhlas, O. S., Mustofa, M., Solehudin, E., & Ridwan, A. H. (2023). Analyzing the legal framework of substitute heirs in Islamic inheritance cases: DKI Jakarta High Religious Courts perspective. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 23(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v23i2.12545
Dananjaya, P. B., Khairina, K., Yowana, I. M. A., BR, W., Rumalean, Z. Z., Mulyeni, Y., Pujiningsih, D., Sari, L., Asmarani, N., & da Santo, M. F. O. (2024). Dasar-dasar hukum: Pedoman hukum di Indonesia. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Dewi, W. C., Marniati, F. S., & Chandra, T. Y. (2025). Kepastian hukum pembatalan hibah hak atas tanah oleh pemberi hibah terhadap hibah yang dibuat di bawah tangan dan akibat hukumnya. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 4(9), 6997–7006.
Dharmaputra, N. S. (2023). Kritisi terhadap teori hukum ketiga Ronald Dworkin. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 1, 1–10.
Djawas, M., Hasballah, K., Devy, S., Kadir, M. A., & Abda, Y. (2022). The construction of Islamic inheritance law: A comparative study of the Islamic jurisprudence and the Compilation of Islamic Law. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 21(2), 207–219.
Fadillah, M., Adnan, & Amin, M. (2023). Kepastian hukum terhadap tanah hibah tanpa surat hibah dalam perspektif KUHPerdata dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. NALAR: Journal of Law and Sharia, 1(3), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.61461/nlr.v1i3.48
Fitriah, N., Suarda, I. G. W., & Tektona, R. I. (2024). Kepastian hukum pembuktian akta hibah yang dibuat berdasarkan perjanjian pinjam nama. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 12(10), 2687–2706. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i10.p25
Ghoni, A. (2023). Penyelesaian perkara li’an di lingkungan peradilan agama perspektif hukum Islam. Indo Green Journal, 1(4), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.31004/green.v1i4.53
Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Peradaban.
Hariati, S. (2024). Penerapan hukum waris Islam pasca berlakunya Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Huma, 10(3), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i3.666
Hasiholan, T., Madjid, A., Aprilianda, N., & Kusumaningrum, A. (2025). Visum et repertum as criminal evidence within the Indonesian criminal justice system. International Review of Social Sciences Research, 5(1), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.53378/irssr.353158
Jamil, S. (2024). Analysis of the regulation of the rights of substitute heirs according to statutory regulations and legal principles. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 5(5), 852–856. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i5.875
Karimullah, S. S. (2023). For true humanity: Harmonization of Islamic law and human rights towards universal justice. Matan: Journal of Islam and Muslim Society, 5(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.matan.2023.5.2.9125
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. University of California Press.
Khumedi, J. (2021). Hukum perdata Islam di Indonesia: Aspek hukum keluarga dan bisnis. Pusat Penelitian dan Penerbitan IAIN Raden Intan.
Mahfud, M. D. (2010). Konstitusi dan hukum dalam kontroversi isu. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Mahmud, P. M. (2016). Pengantar ilmu hukum (Edisi Revisi). Kencana Pranada.
Mamonto, I. P. J., Santosa, I., & Muda, I. (2024). Aspek kepastian hukum sengketa hibah yang mengandung pengharapan imbalan dalam putusan Pengadilan Agama Tutuyan Nomor 14/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tty. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 15(1). https://academicjournal.yarsi.ac.id/index.php/Jurnal-ADIL/article/view/4162/1674
Permadi, I. (2023). Jaminan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik tanah akibat kejahatan mafia tanah. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 8(2), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.26623/JIC.V8I2.6951
Putri, R. S., & Ruslie, A. S. (2023). Penarikan kembali harta hibah sebagai harta waris menurut KHI dan KUHPerdata. Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(2), 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.254
Qomariyah, S. (2014). Transformasi hukum Islam dalam sistem hukum nasional: Idealisme dan realitas. Jurnal Penelitian, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v11i1.10074
Rachmah, A., Djaja, B., & Sudirman, M. (2024). Implementation of electronic land certificates as legal land ownership. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i1.900
Rachman, M. F. F., & Syawali, H. (2022). Gugatan akibat penguasaan harta warisan oleh salah satu ahli waris secara melawan hukum berdasarkan KUHPerdata dan hukum Islam. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 2(2), 1124–1130. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v2i2.2584
Rahardjo, S. (2019). Penegakan hukum: Suatu tinjauan sosiologis (3rd ed.). Genta Publishing.
Rohima, S. (2023). Sebuah pemikiran teori hukum murni Hans Kelsen. TERAJU: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 5(02), 97–108. https://ejournal.stainkepri.ac.id/index.php/teraju/article/view/1453
Sari, M. (2022). Perbandingan penarikan hibah dengan pembatalan akta notaris (Kajian Pasal 212 Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata). Jurnal Ar-Risalah, 2(2), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.30863/arrisalah.v2i2.4160
Sebastian, T. (2023). Anti-positivisme Ronald Dworkin: Menalar hukum sebagai moralitas. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 269–308.
Soeroso, R. (2020). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Susanto, H., Sinaulan, R. L., & Ismed, M. (2022). Legal certainty regarding the imposition of criminal extortion sanctions involving community organizations (ORMAS). Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.152
Cite this article:
Falady, N.S., Permadi, I. & Masykur, M.H. (2025). Between rights and time limits: A critical study of expiration in grants exceeding one-third from the perspective of justice and legal certainty. International Review of Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.53378/irssr.353208
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
