While the importance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) increased during the COVID-19 period, it is also imperative to increase the female representation of the board. Empirical evidence suggests inconclusiveness of the results in the country, period and methods applied. In addition, there is a dearth of studies in the world as well as developing economies. To bridge these research gaps, this study examined the impact of gender diversity on corporate social responsibility in the developing economy as Sri Lanka during the COVID-19 period. A quantitative study using a survey design was conducted with sample size of 133 companies listed at Colombo Stock Exchange using random sampling. The data analysis included descriptive analysis and correlation using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) and Partial Least Squares Regression Model through SMART PLS 3.0. This study found the level of gender diversity in Sri Lanka is 10% indicating low level in the developing economy. Findings also revealed that gender diversity and legal responsibility have significant impact while economic, ethical, and philanthropic have no impact on Sri Lankan companies. Although the study is limited to listed companies and quantitative cross-sectional study, results clearly suggest an increase to the percentage of women directors on board to improve legal responsibility and further achieve sustainable goals in the economy. The findings also suggest new perspective on resource dependence theory.
corporate social responsibility, gender diversity, economic responsibility, ethical responsibility, legal responsibility, philanthropic responsibility, Resource Dependence Theory
This paper is a finalist in the International Research Competitions 2022.
Amorelli, M. F., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 537-554.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
Boukattaya, S., & Omri, A. (2021). Impact of board gender diversity on corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility: Empirical evidence from france. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094712
Cabeza-García, L., Fernández-Gago, R., & Nieto, M. (2018). Do Board Gender Diversity and Director Typology Impact CSR Reporting? European Management Review, 15(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12143
Carroll, A. B. (2009). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Issue July 2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
Dissanayake, D., Tilt, C., & Xydias-Lobo, M. (2016). Sustainability reporting by publicly listed companies in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129(August), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.086
Dutta, Probal and Bose, S. (2008). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Financial Performance of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Bangladesh. 7916.
Ehie, I. C. (2016). Examining the corporate social responsibility orientation in developing countries: An empirical investigation of the Carroll’s CSR pyramid. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2016.076337
Fakir, A. N. M. A., & Jusoh, R. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate sustainability performance: Mediating role of enterprise risk management. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO6.351
Fernando, D., Dissanayake, D.H.S.W., Deshika, N. P. T. (2020). Women in Boards and Sustainability : Empirical evidence from Sri Lanka. 76–77.
García-Sánchez, I.-M. G.-S. and A. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility during COVID-19 Pandemic.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks. Sage, 165.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial monorities in the boardroom: How do they differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763
Issa, A., & Fang, H. X. (2019). The impact of board gender diversity on corporate social responsibility in the Arab Gulf states. Gender in Management, 34(7), 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2018-0087
Khan, M. A. (2017). Impact of Gender Diversity of Board on Corporate Social Responsibility of Firm : A case of Pakistan. February, 84.
Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2017). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian Securities Exchange listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 874–885.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. NY: Harper and Row Publishers.
Quintana-García, C., Marchante-Lara, M., & Benavides-Chicón, C. G. (2018). Social responsibility and total quality in the hospitality industry: does gender matter? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(5), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1401631
Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage, N. C. S. (2018). Board involvement in corporate sustainability reporting: evidence from Sri Lanka. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(6), 1042–1056. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2017-0252
Rupawaththa, R. G. M. N. (2017). Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performances? Analysis of Public Quoted Companies in Sri Lanka. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2908791
Shamil, M. M., Shaikh, J. M., Ho, P. L., & Krishnan, A. (2014). The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting Empirical evidence from Sri Lankan firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-09-2013-0060
Thambugala, M. T. (2020). Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Practices : In Upper Echelon Theory Perspective Evidence from Sri Lankan Firms Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Practices : In Upper Echelon Theory Perspective Evidence fro. November, 0–28.
Wellalage, N. H., & Locke, S. (2013). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm financial performance: New evidence from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 8(2), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2013.054416
Wu, Q., Furuoka, F., & Lau, S. C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and board gender diversity: a meta-analysis. Management Research Review, 2022(November), 2020–2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0236
Yarram, S. R., & Adapa, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: Is there a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123319
Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1400
Chandula A M T. B.Sc. (Special) Accountancy & Business Finance, Undergraduate, Department of Accountancy, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka
Dissanayake H. Corresponding author. Reading for PhD in Management(USJP), MSc in Applied Finance(USJP), Senior Lecturer, Department of Accountancy, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka. Corresponding email: hiranya@wyb.ac.lk
Anuradha I. PhD (USJP), Senior Lecturer, Management and Science Unit, Department of Mathematics, University of Sri Jayewardenepura
Cite this article:
Chandula A M T, Dissanayake H & Anuradha I. (2023). Role of gender diversity on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, 4 (1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.53378/352971
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
