Unpacking the challenges of land restitution in South Africa
H. M. Tshivhase, E. Mahole & S. T. Matloga
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine the ongoing challenges in implementing land restitution in South Africa, particularly within a rural district context, to inform policy reform and suggest a model for enhancing the effectiveness of restitution efforts. Employing a qualitative research approach that relies on secondary data, the study utilises peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and legislative frameworks, while being informed by Land Restitution Theory to explore institutional and governance dynamics. The results indicate that despite South Africa's robust constitutional and legislative framework for land restitution, the implementation is hindered by inadequate institutional capacity, poor coordination among state agencies, ineffective Communal Property Associations (CPAs), market-oriented acquisition methods, and insufficient community involvement. These obstacles have considerably impeded the progress of land reform and weakened its intended socio-economic benefits. Additionally, the study highlights that insufficient post-settlement support and limited empowerment of beneficiaries continue to threaten the sustainability of restituted land. This research contributes to the field of land reform by providing policy-focused recommendations that aim to strengthen institutions, enhance CPA capabilities, foster participatory governance, and explore alternative acquisition methods. Furthermore, it proposes a people-centered model for implementing land restitution that aims to enhance governance, accountability, and livelihood outcomes.
Keywords
community participation, institutional capacity, land restitution, land reform, rural development
Author information & Contribution
H. M. Tshivhase. Department of Public and Development Administration, University of Venda, University Road, Thohoyandou, 0950. Email: miriamtshivhase@gmail.com
E. Mahole. Department of Public and Development Administration, University of Venda, University Road, Thohoyandou, 0950. Email: Ephraim.Mahole@univen.ac.za
S. T. Matloga. Corresponding autor. Department of Public and Development Administration, University of Venda, University Road, Thohoyandou, 0950. Email: Sanah.Matloga@univen.ac.za
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Funding
This work was not supported by any funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not Applicable
AI Declaration
AI tools were not used in writing this paper.
Notes
Acknowledgement
References
Adam, A. G. (2023). Systematic review of the changing land–people relationship and co-evolution of land administration. Heliyon, 9(10), e20637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20637
African National Congress. (1955). The Freedom Charter. ANC.
Akinola, A. (2020). Land reform in South Africa: Interrogating the securitisation of land expropriation without compensation. Politikon, 47(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2020.1715178
Anthony, D. (2021). Review of In this land of plenty: Mickey Leland and Africa in American politics, by B. Talton. Journal of Southern History, 87(4), 747–748. https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2021.0158
Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P. (2014). From failure to success in South African land reform. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(4), 253–269.
Borodina, O., Zdanova, R., & Sinitsa, Y. (2023). The features of calculating compensation payments in case of withdrawal of agricultural land for state and municipal needs. Zemleustrojstvo, Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel’ (Land Management, Cadastre and Land Monitoring). Land management, cadastre and land monitoring, 9. https://doi.org/10.33920/sel-04-2309-04
Chen, S., & Pei, B. (2025). Spatial–temporal variations of cultivated land compensation and its compensation mechanism in mainland China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107712
Claassens, A., & O’Regan, C. (2021). Citizenship and accountability: Customary law and traditional leadership under South Africa’s democratic constitution. Journal of Southern African Studies, 47(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2021.1894788
Cousins, B. (2019). Land reform in South Africa is sinking. Can it be saved? Nelson Mandela Foundation.
Cousins, B. (2022). Land reform in South Africa: The politics of expropriation without compensation. In Land tenure challenges in Africa: Confronting the land governance deficit (pp. 99–119). Springer International Publishing.
De Maria, M., Robinson, E., & Zanello, G. (2023). Fair compensation in large-scale land acquisitions: Fair or fail? World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106338
Ding, Z., & Yao, S. (2022). Theory and valuation of cross-regional ecological compensation for cultivated land: A case study of Shanxi Province, China. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108609
Fintel, D., & Fourie, J. (2019). The great divergence in South Africa: Population and wealth dynamics over two centuries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(4), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2019.08.005
FleMandipaza, B. (2025). From promised land to perilous plight: Unpacking tensions, contestations and marginalisation in resettlement schemes of Zimbabwe. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 60(4), 2356–2370. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231215712
He, Q., Jiang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The gains and losses of cultivated land requisition–compensation balance: Analysis of the spatiotemporal trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services using Hubei Province as a case study. Land, 13(10), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101641
Higginson, J. (2024). “If your ox does not pull, what are you going to do?” Persistent violence in South Africa’s deep-level gold mines and its contribution to the 1922 Rand Rebellion. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 66(4), 960–984. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417524000148
Hobbs, P. (2020). The blood-sucker bird: A woven narrative of exploitation and dependency. Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.17159/2617-3255/2020/n34a13
Kiguwa, P. (2024). On proceedings too terrible (but necessary) to relate: Land restitution and violence in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 120(5–6). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/18219
Land Audit Report. (2017). Land audit report: Phase II – Private land ownership by race, gender and nationality. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform.
Lekalake, R. (2023). Property, place, and politics: Essays on the political economy of land in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Liu, Z., Gong, Y., & Kontoleon, A. (2018). How do payments for environmental services affect land tenure? Theory and evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 144, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.007
Mabapa, L., & Ngoepe, M. (2025). Empowering or disempowering? Archives as a tool to support or hinder land restitution in South Africa. Information Development, 41(2), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231170397
Morifi, K., & Mahlatsi, M. (2021). Negotiating meaningful citizenship in the zone of exclusion: The impact of racism on belonging in the new South Africa. In The contested idea of South Africa (1st ed., p. 15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340857
Mutanga, O., & Haihambo, C. K. (2024). Ubuntu philosophy and the paradox of disability: Voices from Ovambo and Damara communities in Namibia. African Identities, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2024.2440083
Ngarava, S. (2023). Implications of land restitution as a transformative social policy for water–energy–food (WEF) insecurity in Magareng Local Municipality, South Africa. Land Use Policy, 133, 106878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106878
Ngoepe-Ntsoane, M. (2022). The land restitution claim model towards sustainable socio-economic development: A case study of Zebediela Country Estate community in Limpopo Province of South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 57(3), 529–543. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jpad_v57_n3_a8
Nguyen, T. (2024). Vietnamese regulations on the compensation for damage upon state agricultural land acquisition. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(3), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.3.115
Percival, V., & Homer-Dixon, T. (2018). The case of South Africa. In Environmental scarcity and conflict (pp. 13–35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500794-2
Pheko, L. L. (2024). The political economy of land reparations in South Africa. Development and Change, 55(4), 800–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12856
Pitcher-Murray, A. (2024). Landback and the case for land restitution: How the South African Land Claims Court and restitution programme can inform the return of Indigenous land in the United States. UC Davis Social Justice Law Review, 28, 1.
Pons-Vignon, N. (2020). Review of Twentieth century South Africa: A developmental history, by B. Freund. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 103, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2020.0020
Salaymeh, L., & Michaels, R. (2022). Decolonial comparative law: A conceptual beginning. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht / The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law, 166–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45419021
Setiabudhi, D. O. (2019). Pengelolaan aset pemerintah daerah dalam perspektif good governance. The Studies of Social Sciences, 1(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.35801/tsss.2019.1.1.25014
South Africa History Organisation. (2021). The Group Areas Act of 1950. https://www.sahistory.org.za
South African Government. (2021). Restitution of Land Rights Act (Act No. 22 of 1994). https://www.gov.za/documents/restitution-land-rights-act
Sprinchorn, E. (2021). Ibsen’s kingdom: The man and his works. Yale University Press.
Strauss, M. (2019). A historical exposition of spatial injustice and segregated urban settlement in South Africa. Fundamina, 25(2), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2019/v25n2a6
Tagliarino, N. (2017). The status of national legal frameworks for valuing compensation for expropriated land. Land, 6(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6020037
The South African Interim Constitution. (1993). Act No. 200 of 1993. Government Gazette.
Wu, J., Wu, G., Kong, X., Luo, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Why should landowners in protected areas be compensated? Land Use Policy, 95, 104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104640
Xu, L. (2019). Factory, family, and industrial frontier: A socioeconomic study of Chinese clothing firms in Newcastle, South Africa. Economic History of Developing Regions, 34(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2019.1669442
Cite this article:
Tshivhase, H.M., Mahole, E. & Matloga, S.T. (2026). Unpacking the challenges of land restitution in South Africa. International Review of Social Sciences Research, 6(1), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.53378/irssr.353306
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Find this article in:
Most read articles
- Social media usage and the academic performance of Filipino junior high school students
- Exploring the factors influencing commuters’ satisfaction and the use of public utility buses in Quezon City, Philippines
- A narrative exploration of romantic experiences and ideal relationship standards among Filipino Gen Z
- Students’ exposure to social media and their radical involvement on the societal issues in the Philippines
- ChatGPT integration significantly boosts personalized learning outcomes: A Philippine study
- Tiktok made me book it: The impact of Tiktok on tourism destination selection of generation Z and millennials in Manila
- Senior high school students’ awareness and literacy on computer software applications
- Self-perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness
- Enhancing financial literacy among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program beneficiaries
- Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy of university student leaders