This research discusses the use of Visum et Repertum (VeR), an expert testimony, as evidence in criminal justice system in Indonesia. The main issue identified in this research is the legal vacuum regarding the use of VeR before the investigation, which results in VeR made during the preliminary investigation stage not having the same legal force as VeR made during the investigation stage. Hence, this study used normative legal approach with analysis of applicable legislation. The analysis shows that VeR has a strong legal position as valid evidence according to the Criminal Procedure Code but there is an urgent need for regulations that state VeR requested during the preliminary investigation stage can be used as evidence with the same probative force as VeR requested during the investigation stage. This study proposes the issuance of regulations stating that VeR made before the investigation remains valid, both investigators and interrogators are authorized to request VeR in writing, and the probative force of VeR requested during the preliminary investigation stage should be considered equivalent to VeR requested during the investigation stage.
criminal violence, visum et repertum, evidence, Indonesia
Tohom Hasiholan. Corresponding author. Doctor of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia. Email: hasiholantohom@gmail.com
Abdul Madjid. Doctor of Law, Graduate Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia. Email: majid@ub.ac.id
Nurini Aprilianda. Doctor of Law, Graduate Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia. Email: nurini.aprilianda@ub.ac.id
Adi Kusumaningrum. Doctor of Law, Graduate Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia. Email: adi_ningrum@ub.ac.id
"All authors equally contributed to the conception, design, preparation, data gathering and analysis, and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript."
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
This work was not supported by any funding.
Not applicable.
AI tools were not used in writing this paper.
Arliman. S, L. (2019). Mewujudkan penegakan hukum yang baik di negara hukum Indonesia. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v11i1.1831
Aswandi, B., & Roisah, K. (2019). Negara hukum dan demokrasi pancasila dalam kaitannya dengan hak asasi manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145
Azhar, M. F., & Taun, T. (2022). Aspek hukum terhadap peran psikologi forensik dalam penanganan pelaku kejahatan tindak pidana ditinjau pada hukum positif Indonesia. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 5(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v5i2.13527
Chandra, T. Y. (2022). Hukum Pidana. Malang: Sangir Multi Usaha.
Chanif, M. (2021). Implementasi pasal 44 KUHP sebagai alasan penghapus pidana dalam proses pemeriksaan perkara pidana. MAGISTRA Law Review, 2(01), 60. https://doi.org/10.35973/malrev.v2i1.2067
Christina, O. K. F., Elias, R. F., & Bawole, H. (2024). Analisis yuridis atas penggunaan visum et repertum dalam mengungkap tindak pidana pembunuhan. Lex Administratum, 12(3). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/55649
Firmansyah, M., & Simangunsong, F. (2024). The position of Visum Et Repertum as evidence in proving criminal cases in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli, 7(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v7i1.2152
Harahap, Y. (2019). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP penyidikan Dan Penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2019). Teori dan hukum pembuktian. Erlangga.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Salam, A., Zuwandana, A., Al Azmi, C., Wijaya, C. R., Darnita, Tania, I., Lubis, L. K. A., Sitorus, M. A. P., Adawiyah, R., & Sinaga, R. (2022). Analysis of the implementation of law in every level of society in Indonesia. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.80
Khairunnisa, C. (2023). Manfaat ilmu forensik dalam hukum Pidana. Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 1–12. https://journal.lps2h.com/cendekia/article/view/6
Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, F. T. (2022). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Unram Press.
Muksin, M. R. S., & Rochaeti, N. (2020). Pertimbangan hakim dalam menggunakan keterangan ahli kedokteran forensik sebagai alat bukti tindak pidana pembunuhan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.343-358
Nasarudin, A. N., & Arafat, M. R. (2023). Peranan dan kedudukan visum et repertum sebagai alat bukti tindak pidana perkosaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(14), 131–142.
Purwoleksono, D. E. (2023). Perkembangan 3 Pilar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia (Cetakan 1). Litnus.
Rivandioza, R. (2020). Kebijakan kriminal penanganan kejahatan mayantara pada satuan reserse kriminal aceh tenggara. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.30596/edutech.v6i1.4394
Shara, D. W., Amelia, N. R., & Manalu, B. R. (2019). Peranan visum et repertum dalam proses pembuktian perkara pidana penganiayaan biasa yang mengakibatkan kematian (Putusan Nomor: 3490/Pid.B/2015/Pn.Mdn). JURNAL MERCATORIA, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2353
Sugiarto, T. (2018). Peranan Visum Et Repertum dalam mengungkap tindak pidana pembunuhan. IUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum, 6(2), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.51747/ius.v6i2.656
Susanto, H., Sinaulan, R. L., & Ismed, M. (2022). Legal certainty regarding the imposition of criminal extortion sanctions involving community organizations (ORMAS). Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.152
Wahono, E., & Prawesthi, W. (2023). Ratio Decidendi in determining tools of evidence instructions for settlement of criminal cases the murder trial. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues, 2(4), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v2i4.780
Widowati, W., Ohoiwutun, Y. A. T., Nugroho, F. M., Samsudi, S., & Suyudi, G. A. (2021). Peranan autopsi forensik dan korelasinya dengan kasus kematian tidak wajar. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1.p1-18
Wulandari, P. A. (2024). Reform of criminal law on the implementation of restorative justice by prosecuting institutions in Indonesia. Ratio Legis Journal, 3(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.131-140
Yudianto, A. (2020). Ilmu kedokteran forensik. Scopindo Media Pustaka.
Yusuf, M., Karim, M. S., & Badaru, B. (2020). Kedudukan visum et repertum sebagai alat bukti dalam dakwaan penuntut umum terhadap tindak pidana penganiayaan berat. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 1(2), 166–182.
Cite this article:
Hasiholan, T., Madjid, A., Aprilianda, N. & Kusumaningrum, A. (2025). Visum et Repertum as criminal evidence within the Indonesian criminal justice system. International Review of Social Sciences Research, 5(1), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.53378/irssr.353158
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
