Multigrade teaching arises within a graded education system when a single classroom includes learners from two or more grade levels, in contrast to the conventional model in which each class consists of students from only one grade level. While age and grade are typically aligned, variations occur in contexts where grade repetition or acceleration is common. Berry (2017) identifies three primary reasons for the adoption of multigrade teaching across both developed and developing countries. First, it is a necessity in small, often remote schools with limited staff, where one to three teachers deliver the full primary cycle across up to eight grade levels. These “multigrade schools” extend educational access to marginalized populations and increase participation particularly among girls by bringing schooling closer to communities. Second, in larger urban or suburban schools, multigrade teaching is used to address uneven enrollment, combining grade levels to balance class sizes or to compensate for absent teachers when substitutes are unavailable, as reported in parts of Africa and the Caribbean (World Bank, 2017). Third, it may serve as a deliberate pedagogical choice. In some developed countries, multiage classrooms are promoted to foster social development, while in developing contexts, multigrade teaching is often valued for its cost-effectiveness in expanding access to education (Berry, 2017).
Beyond widening access, multigrade instruction has the potential to equal and in some cases surpass—the quality of monograde classes (Barbetta et al., 2023), contributing not only to academic achievement but also to learners’ social development. Realizing this potential requires curricula aligned with learners’ diverse abilities, effective classroom management strategies such as flexible grouping, and sustained investments in teacher training (Bacani, 2020). As an alternative education modality, multigrade teaching entails instructional methods that diverge significantly from conventional approaches (Naparan & Alinsug, 2021). Accordingly, teachers’ professional competencies must be continuously strengthened through targeted training and capacity-building initiatives (Anzano et al., 2021).
Scheduling practices also shape the quality of multigrade instruction. Many schools adopt uniform timetables in which all grade levels in a combined class study the same subject at the same time (e.g., Science and Health from 9:00–9:40 a.m., followed by Mathematics after recess). Others adopt integrated scheduling, enabling simultaneous delivery of multiple subjects across grades. Classroom management styles likewise vary: approximately 80 percent of multigrade schools in the Philippines rely on traditional management practices such as structured rules and routines, while a smaller proportion employ innovative, learner-centered approaches (DepEd, 2018). Although methods such as cooperative learning, peer teaching, and interactive activities (e.g., singing, games) are increasingly used, conventional lectures and teacher-led discussions remain the most prevalent strategies (Hyry-Beihammer & Hascher, 2015).
Multigrade education is neither a recent innovation nor an experimental model. As Bacani (2020) underscores, it has existed for over a century, shaped largely by geographic isolation and economic necessity. In the Philippines, multigrade teaching has proven to be a cost-effective strategy for reaching underserved, remote areas with low student populations per grade. At present, nearly one-third of the country’s public elementary schools implement multigrade instruction, enhancing both access and learning outcomes. Ultimately, multigrade teaching entails the simultaneous instruction of learners across different grade levels, and often across diverse ages and abilities, within a single classroom. Such a context requires not only specialized pedagogical strategies and methodologies but also adaptive classroom management skills, reflecting the complex realities and opportunities inherent in multigrade education.
Bibliography
Akdas, M. S., & Kalman, M. (2021). Challenges affecting teaching-learning processes in multi-grade classes: A comparison of pre-pandemic and peri-pandemic periods. In W. B. James, C. Cobanoglu, & M. Cavusoglu (Eds.), Advances in global education and research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–13). USF M3 Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5038/9781955833042
Anzano, S., Vázquez, S., & Liesa, M. (2021). Analysis of initial training in rural schools for teacher training courses: Assessments and perceptions of students as stakeholders. Pedagogical Trends, 37, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2021.37.005
Bacani, R. (2020). Current situation and practices of multigrade schools in the Philippines: Case studies. SEAMEO INNOTECH.
Barbetta, G. P., Chuard-Keller, P., Sorrenti, G., & Turati, G. (2023). Good or bad? Understanding the effects over time of multigrading on child achievement. Economics of Education Review, 96, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102442
Berry, C. (2017). Multigrade teaching: A discussion document. http://multigrade.ioe.ac.uk/fulltext/fulltextBerry.pdf
Castigador, D. L. (2019). Lived experiences of multigrade teachers. The PASCHR Journal, 2, 59–63.
Daga, C. (2021). Challenges and indulgences behind multigrade teaching: A case study. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 11(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1103074556
Erden, H. (2020). Teaching and learning in multi-graded classrooms: Is it sustainable? International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(Special Issue), 359–378.
Goodman, J., Schlossberg, N. K., & Anderson, M. L. (2006). Counseling adults in transition: Linking practice with theory (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
Hyry-Beihammer, E. K., & Hascher, T. (2015). Multigrade teaching in primary education as a promising pedagogy for teacher education in Austria and Finland. In International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies (Part C).
Kalender, B., & Erdem, E. (2021). Challenges faced by classroom teachers in multigrade classrooms: A case study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021473490
Lapuz, M. C. (2015). Delights and difficulties of multigrade teachers in rural schools. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research, 3(7), 144–151.
Lariosa, E. I., Diendo, M. P., & Espinosa, F. (2022). Lived experiences of multigrade teachers in far-flung schools. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 9, 17–21.
Larson, L. (2021). Assessment of perceived levels of stress and coping mechanism use among elementary school teachers [Master’s thesis, Minnesota State University, Mankato]. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/1138/
Montalbo, I., Pogoy, A., Pepito, G., & Cabanilla Jr., A. (2021). Teachers’ experiences in multi-grade instruction: A meta-synthesis. Multicultural Education, 7(10), 387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5567812
Mulaudzi, M. S. (2016). Challenges experienced by teachers of multi-grade classes in primary schools at Nzhelele East Circuit (Master’s thesis, University of South Africa).
Naparan, G. B., & Alinsug, V. G. (2020). Classroom strategies of multigrade teachers. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3651296
Okamoto, Y., & Potane, J. D. (2020). Opportunities and challenges in multigrade teaching using direct and indirect teaching methods with Zurashi and Watari approaches in the Philippines: Kagay-Anon RIA Schools experiences. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference at Kochi University, Japan.
Quejada, & Orale. (2018). Lived experiences of elementary teachers in a remote school in Samar, Philippines. Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 1–13.
UNESCO. (2015). Practical tips for teaching multigrade classes. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000220101
