Systematic document review of gender policies in higher education: Analysis on policy formulation, adoption and implementation practice

Zelalem Zekarias Oliso & Sibongile Simelane-Mnisi

Volume 7 Issue 3, September 2026

Abstract

Formulating sound gender policies is vital to dismantling systemic barriers that women face and transforming academic institutions into equitable environments. While previous studies have focused on the barriers to women's leadership in higher education, little research has been devoted to gender policies in South African public universities. This study aims to explore the existing gender policy formulation, adoption, and implementation practices at South African academia. To this end, the study adopted an interpretivist research paradigm and employed a qualitative research approach. The review documents were screened using the PRISMA flow chart, and a total of (n=24) documents were included, comprising (n=16) gender policy documents and (n=8) past studies. The findings indicate that the absence of a comprehensive, supportive, and clear gender policy is evident in South African academia. The majority of the existing formulated gender policies do not refer to international, continental, and regional legal instruments. The study further uncovered that the presence of poor implementation of the formulated gender policy is another key challenge that obstructs gender equality in South African public universities. This study contributes to South African higher education and gender policy literature by revealing a critical gender policy-practice gap.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Zelalem Zekarias Oliso. Corresponding author. PhD. Postdoctoral Fellow at Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa. Email: olisozz@tut.ac.za

Sibongile Simelane-Mnisi. PhD. Full research Professor, Lecturer and Instructional Designer at Tshwane University of Technology, Faculty of Humanities, School of Education, and Department of Educational Foundation.

"All authors contributed to the conceptualization, data collection, analysis, and writing of this manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version."

Disclosure statement

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Data and Materials Availability

AI Declaration

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Barends, G., Rogers, S., & Rietbergen, C. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283

Bayaga, A., & Mtose, X. (2021). Black women leadership development in higher education space in post-apartheid South Africa: Identity & complexity trajectory. The Journal of Negro Education, 90(4), 457–471. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48679122

Booth, A., Noyes, J., Flemming, K., Gerhardus, A., Wahlster, P., van der Wilt, G. J., Mozygemba, K., Refolo, P., Sacchini, D., Tummers, M., & Rehfuess, E. (2016). Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. Integrate-HTA. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/182101/

Boutron, I., Page, M. J., Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Lundh, A., & Hróbjartsson, A. (2023). Chapter 7: Considering risk of bias due to missing results. In J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, & V. A. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 6.4). Cochrane. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Boulton, G., & Lucas, C. (2008). What are universities for? League of European Research Universities. https://www.leru.org/files/What-are-Universities-for-Full-paper.pdf

Burkinshaw, P., Jane, C., & Jacqueline, F. (2018). Empirical evidence illuminating gendered regimes in UK higher education: Developing a new conceptual framework. Educational Sciences, 8(2), Article 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020081

Commission for Gender Equality, CGE. (2019). Best price or best practice? How government fails at gender responsive procurement. https://dullahomarinstitute.org.za/women-and-democracy/parlybeat/best-price-or-best-practice-how-government-fails-at-gender-responsive-procurement

Commission for Gender Equality, CGE. (2025). Annual Report 2024/2025. https://cge.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/ANNUAL-REPORT-2024-2025.pdf

Gwiza, M., & Hendricks, E. A. (2025). Justice for the survivors: Examining the effectiveness of the adopted university policy in serving justice on gender-based violence cases at a selected South African university. Social and Health Sciences, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.25159/2957-3645/17436

Hatch, J. A. (2023). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438494623

Hlatshwayo, L. P., Mashaba, B., Mathuloe, O., & Yende, S. J. (2022). Being a woman is not a barrier to achieving successful leadership in South African higher education. African Journal of Gender, Society and Development, 11(4), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n4a1

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Kaymakcioglu, A. G., & Thomas, M. (2024). Gender inequalities and academic leadership in Nigeria, South Africa and the United Kingdom: A systematic literature review (2013–2023). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101066

Kela, S. Pillay, S. Fana, T., Zikhali, A. & Muroa, M.T. (2024). An assessment of barriers and enablers to women progression into leadership positions in the South African public higher education sectors, Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.55190/JPADA.2024.325

Kele, T., & Pietersen, J. (2015). Women leaders in a South African higher education institution: Narrations of their leadership operations. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(5), 11–16. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/51248

Khumalo, M., & Zhou, X. (2019). Women’s leadership experiences in higher education institutions: The context of South Africa. In Proceedings of the UR International Conference on Educational Sciences (pp. 190–196). Universitas Riau Press.

Lefebvre, C., Glanville, J., Briscoe, S., Littlewood, A., Marshall, C., Metzendorf, M.-I., Noel-Storr, A., Rader, T., Shokraneh, F., Thomas, J., & Wieland, L. S. (2019). Searching for and selecting studies. In J. P. T. Higgins et al. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2nd ed., pp. 67–108). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch4

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Loots, S., & Walker, M. (2015). Shaping a gender equality policy in higher education: Which human capabilities matter? Gender and Education, 27(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1045458

Lowndes, V. (2020). How are institutions gendered? Political Studies Review, 18(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929919864459

Mackay, F., & Waylen, G. (2009). Feminist institutionalism. Politics & Gender, 5(2), 237–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x09000178

Mankayi, M. & Cheteni, M. (2021). Experiences of female deans in South African universities: A phenomenological study. Cogent Education, 8 (1), 1981-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1981199

Mahood, Q., Van Eerd, D., & Irvin, E. (2014). Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: Challenges and benefits. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1106

Moodly, A. L. (2022). Promoting gender-based violence awareness in higher education institutions: The case of student representative councils. Administratio Publica, 30(3), 126–145.

Moodly, A. L. (2025). Gender equity in leading a South African private higher education institution. South African Journal of Higher Education, 39(5). https://journals.co.za/doi/10.20853/39-5-5776

Moodly, A. L., & Toni, N. M. (2017). Re-imagining higher education leadership – in conversation with South African female deputy vice-chancellors. Perspectives in Education, 35(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v35i2.12

Muleya, X., & Mothoagae, I. (2025). Breaking barriers: A comparative analysis of the challenges faced by women in traditional leadership positions in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(4), 1620–1629. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i4.6897

Ngonyama, S., & Adewumi, S. (2026). Gender discrimination, construction, and glass ceiling effects among women academics in a higher education institution in South Africa: Exploring alternatives for women’s empowerment. Administrative Sciences, 16, Article 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16030117

Oliso, Z.Z. & Simelane-Mnisi, S. (2026). Persisting challenges of women in accessing senior leadership positions in South African higher education: A comprehensive systematic review. International Review of Social Sciences Research, 6(2), 272-293. https://doi.org/10.53378/irssr.353366

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 18(3), Article e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583

Pillay, P. (2025). Women’s leadership in South African higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 12(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2025.12.1.736

Ramohai, J. (2019). Women in senior management positions at South African universities: Their movement in, out and across universities. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 34 (3), 1754-2413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-2017-0138

Randles, R., & Finnegan, A. (2023). Guidelines for writing a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 124, Article 105803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105803

Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(2), 174–200. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.962

Reynolds, J., & Saunders, M. (1987). Teacher responses to curriculum policy: Beyond the “delivery” metaphor. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking, 195–214. Cassell Educational Limited.

Saunders, M. (2006). The ‘implementation staircase’ and communication in planning for change. In P. Trowler (Ed.), Higher education policy and institutional change. Open University Press.

Sebola, M. (2015). Achieving gender equity in leadership of South African institutions of higher learning: Is woman empowerment mission impossible in universities? The Business and Management Review, 6(5), 77–81.

Singh, K., Ntombizanele, T., Mbuyiswa, A.A. N., & Mseleku, P. N. (2024). Evolution of South African woman in higher education: Past, present, future. In Proceedings of the Focus Conference (TFC 2024). Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities, 31, 255–269. Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-630-7_14

Sokani, A. (2025). Why are women still underrepresented in leadership roles at South African higher education institutions? A systematic literature review. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 14(5), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.4095

Waylen, G. (2011). Gendered institutions and women’s substantive representation. Representation, 47(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2011.581075

Zeng, X., Zhang, Y., Kwong, J. S., Zhang, C., Li, S., Sun, F., An, M., Coates, A., Shannon, C., & Du, L. (2015). The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 8(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12141

Cite this article:

Oliso, Z.Z. & Simelane-Mnisi, S. (2026). Systematic document review of gender policies in higher education: Analysis on policy formulation, adoption and implementation practice. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 7(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353372