Development of an offline computer-based assessment tool in statistics and probability utilizing MS PowerPoint and MS Excel

Abdulrahman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(20)32155-1.pdf

Akdemir, O. & Oguz, A. (2008). Computer-based testing: An alternative for the assessment of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1198-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.007

Alabi, A., Samuel, K. & Sabitu, A. (2023). Effectiveness of computer based and paper pencil tests on the achievement of senior secondary school chemistry students in Kano Metropolis. AJSTME, 9(2), 97-102.

AlAdl, A. (2020). Using electronic tests versus pen and paper tests: The experience of Delta University. Journal of the Faculty of Education – Mansoura University, 2(110), 31-45. https://maed.journals.ekb.eg/article_147690_d5d445b1d47b48bd4ac64748e5d38ae.pdf

Alek, A., Marzuki, A. G., Farkhan, M., Surahman, D., Daryanto, D., & Febrianto, S. (2020). Computer based testing in senior high school on national examination. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 2(2), 204-210. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijolec.v2i2.340

Ancho, I., & Bongco, R. (2019). Exploring Filipino teachers’ professional workload. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 9(2), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol9.no2.2.2019

Asio, J.R.,  Gadia, E.D., Abarintos, E.C., Paguio, D.P. & Balce, M. (2021). Internet connection and learning device availability of college students: basis for institutionalizing flexible learning in the new normal. Studies in Humanities and Education, 2(1): 56 – 69. DOI : 10.48185/she.v2i1.224

Barrot, J.S., Llenares, I.I. & del Rosario, L.S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Educ Inf Technol 26, 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x

Bayazit, A. & Aşkar, P. (2012). Performance and duration differences between online and paper–pencil tests. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 13, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9190-9

Bloom, T. J., Rich, W. D., Olson, S. M., & Adams, M. L. (2018). Perceptions and performance using computer-based testing: One institution’s experience. Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning, 10(2), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.10.015

Blundell, C. N. (2021). Teacher use of digital technologies for school-based assessment: A scoping review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1929828

Brady, J., & Wilson, E. (2021). Teacher well-being in England: Teacher responses to school-level initiatives. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1775789

Burgmanis, G., Mikite, M., France, I., & Namsone, D. (2023). Development of computer-based diagnostic assessment system: Case study of equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 613-622. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2023vol1.7096

Campbell, P. (2014). Modifying ADDIE: Incorporating new technologies in library instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 10(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2014.904214

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Ceka, B., & O’Geen, A. (2019). Evaluating student performance on computer-based versus handwritten exams: Evidence from a field experiment in the classroom. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 757-762. doi:10.1017/S104909651900091X

Cha, H., Park, T., & Seo, J. (2020). What should be considered when developing ICT-integrated classroom models for a developing country? Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072967

Csapó, B., Ainley, J., Bennett, R.E., Latour, T., Law, N. (2012). Technological Issues for Computer-Based Assessment. In: Griffin, P., McGaw, B., Care, E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_4

Danniels, E., Pyle, A. & DeLuca, C. (2020). The role of technology in supporting classroom assessment in play-based kindergarten. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102966

Darr, C. (2014). Computer-administered vs paper-and-pencil tests: Is there a difference? Set: Research Information for Teachers, (3), 61-64. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0322

Das, K. (2019). The role and impact of ICT in improving the quality of education: An overview. International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sociology and Humanities, 4(6), 97-103. https://ijissh.org/storage/Volume4/Issue6/IJISSH-040611.pdf

Debuse, J.C.W. & Lawley, M. (2016). Benefits and drawbacks of computer-based assessment and feedback systems: Student and educator perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12232

Dembitzer, L., Zelikpvitz, S., & Kettler, R. (2017). Designing computer-based assessments: multidisciplinary findings and student perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 20-31.

DiCarlo, C.F., Deris, A.R. & Deris, T.P. (2023). mLearning Versus Paper and Pencil Practice for Telling Time: Impact for Attention and Accuracy. J Behav Educ, 32(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09442-5

Efendi, R., Lesmana, L. S., Putra, F., Yandani, E., & Wulandari, R. A. (2021, February). Design and Implementation of Computer Based Test (CBT) in vocational education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 012068. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012068

Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A. & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using technology for formative assessment to improve students’ learning TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 182-188.

Gocotano, T.E., Jerodiaz, M.L., Banggay, J.P., Nasibog, H. & Go, M.B. (2021). Higher education students’ challenges on flexible online learning implementation in the rural areas: A Philippine case. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(7), 262-290. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.7.15

Gonzales, R.D. & Callueng, C.M. (2014). Classroom assessment practices of Filipino teachers: Measurement and impact of professional development. In: Magno, C. & Gaerlan, M. (eds.). Essential of Counseling Education. Asian Psychological Services and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1950.3685

Grapin, N., & Sayac, N. (2022). From paper-pencil to tablet-based assessment: A comparative study at the end of primary school. Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. https://hal.science/hal-03753427

Hundani, M., & Toquero, C. M. (2021). Teaching-related paperwork: examining linkage to occupational stress of public school teachers in primary education. ASEAN Journal of Basic and Higher Education, 5, 13-25. https://www.paressu.org/online/index.php/aseanjbh/article/view/286

Jomuad, P. D., Antiquina, L. M. M., Cericos, E. U., Bacus, J. A., Vallejo, J. H., Dionio, B. B., Bazar, J. S., Cocolan, J.V., & Clarin, A. S. (2021). Teachers’ workload in relation to burnout and work performance. International journal of educational policy research and review. https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.21.007

Joy, O. T. E. (2023). Impact of Computer-Based Tests on the Quality of Education in Nigeria. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Engineering, 3(03), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijitc.36.1.7

Jurāne-Brēmane, A. (2023). Digital Assessment in Technology-Enriched Education: Thematic Review. Education Sciences. 13(5): 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050522

Kaipa, R. M. (2021). Multiple choice questions and essay questions in curriculum. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 16-32. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JARHE-01-2020-0011/full/html

Kumar, A. P., Nayak, A., Shenoy, M., & Goyal, S. (2023). A novel approach to generate distractors for multiple choice questions. Expert Systems with Applications, 225, Article 120022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120022

Laurie, R., Bridglall, B. L., & Arseneault, P. (2015). Investigating the effect of computer-administered versus traditional paper and pencil assessments on student writing achievement. SAGE Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015584616

Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Lesly, N. (2021). Implementing a computer-based test (CBT) as final assessment and its relevance to the teaching and learning process (A case of students and teachers in SMA Negeri 1 Soe). Wiralodra English Journal, 5(2), 15-27. https://wej.unwir.ac.id/index.php/wej/article/view/132

Looney, J. W. (2009). Assessment and innovation in education. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 24, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/222814543073

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Maqableh, M., Masa’deh, R. & Mohammed, A. (2015) The acceptance and use of computer based assessment in higher education. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 8, 557-574. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2015.810053.

Mirsharapovna, S. Z., Shadjalilovna, S. M., Kakhramonovich, A. A., & Malikovna, K. R. N. (2022). Pros and cons of computer technologies in education. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 14, 26-29. https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjm/article/view/2658

Moon, J. L. (2013). Comparability of online and paper/pencil mathematics performance measures [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska]. Lincoln ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f7029531aa38d9a6ba29f5688270f741/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Neumann, M.M., Anthony, J.L., Erazo, N.A. and Neumann, D.L. (2019). Assessment and technology: Mapping future directions in the early childhood classroom. Front. Educ. 4:116. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00116

Nikou, S.A. & Economides, A.A. (2019). A comparative study between a computer-based and a mobile-based assessment: Usability and user experience. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2019-0003

Nye, C.D. (2022). Technology-based assessments: Novel approaches to testing in organizational, psychological, and educational settings. International Journal of Testing, 22:3-4, 213-215, https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2022.2143173

Obilor, E. I. (2023). Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the same. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 11(1), 1-7. https://seahipaj.org/journals-ci/mar-2023/IJISSER/full/IJISSER-M-1-2023.pdf

Pentang, J. T. (2021). Technological dimensions of globalization across organizations: Inferences for instruction and research. International Educational Scientific Research Journal, 7(7), 28-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3896459

Pentang, J. T. (2023, May 10). Quantitative research instrumentation for educators. Lecture Series on Research Process and Publication, Wesleyan University – Philippines. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21153.28004

Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417

Richey, R., & Klein, J. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961473

Ripana, U. (2022). Computer based test in modern era for students at Mitradharma Senior High School. Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia, 3(1), 27-32.  https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v3i1.50

Sarmiento, C. P., Morales, M. E., Elipane, L. E., & Palomar, B. C. (2020). Assessment practices in Philippine higher STEAM education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.5.18

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Shudong Wang, Hong Jiao, Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2008). Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K–12 reading assessments: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407305592

Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer‐based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12172

Sibberns, H. (2020). Technology and Assessment. In: Wagemaker, H. (eds) Reliability and Validity of International Large-Scale Assessment. IEA Research for Education, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53081-5_10

Sirianni, J. M., Ng, Y. J., & Vishwanath, A. (2017). Adopting computer-based assessments: The role of perceived value in classroom technology acceptance. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(4), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2607

Smolinsky, L., Marx, B. D., Olafsson, G., & Ma, Y. A. (2020). Computer-based and paper-and-pencil tests: A study in calculus for STEM majors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(7), 1256-1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120930235

Sullivan, P. D. (2020). An examination of the use of computer-based formative assessments. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2116. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/2116

Terzis, V. & Economides, A.A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017

Terzis, V. & Economides, A.A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017

Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S. S., Albus, D., & Hodgson, J. (2010). Computer-based testing: Practices and considerations (Synthesis Report 78). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Tilden, V. P., Nelson, C. A., & May, B. A. (1990). Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nursing Research, 39(3), 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199005000-00015

Tomasik, M.J., Berger, S. & Moser, U. (2018). On the development of a computer-based tool for formative student assessment: Epistemological, methodological, and practical issues. Front. Psychol. 9:2245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02245

von der Embse, N., Ryan, S. V., Gibbs, T., & Mankin, A. (2019). Teacher stress interventions: A systematic review. Psychology in the Schools, 56(8), 1328-1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22279

Wagner, I., Loesche, P. & Bißantz, S. (2022). Low-stakes performance testing in Germany by the VERA assessment: analysis of the mode effects between computer-based testing and paper-pencil testing. Eur J Psychol Educ, 37, 531–549 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00532-6

Wang, T.H., Kao, C.H. & Chen, H.C. (2021). Factors associated with the equivalence of the scores of computer-based test and paper-and-pencil test: Presentation type, item difficulty and administration order. Sustainability, 13(17), Article 9548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179548

Zacharis, N.Z. (2010). Innovative assessment for learning enhancement: issues and practices. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v3i1.162

Zheng, M., & Bender, D. (2019). Evaluating outcomes of computer-based classroom testing: Student acceptance and impact on learning and exam performance. Medical teacher, 41(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1441984