Institute of Industry and Academic Research Incorporated
Register in

We support knowledge society through open access books.

Flexible learning modalities in the Philippines: COVID-19 and beyond

Jupeth T. Pentang, Manuel L. Bucad Jr. & Ronalyn M. Bautista
Chapter 1
ISBN:

978-621-96810-3-2

The form of education encompasses a plethora of significant changes toward innovation, discovery, and progress, and this form will always need to evolve and adapt to the challenges faced, encountered, and experienced by trailblazers. Flexible learning approaches have grown in popularity in the Philippines in recent years, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Flexible learning refers to any educational system that gives pupils more control over their study time, place, direction, or pace (Cassidy et al., 2016; Davies et al., 2020). Students have more say over when, where, and how they learn. Flexible learning is a combination of digital and non-digital technologies (Santiago et al., 2021) that aims to make education accessible and inclusive. Studies have found that flexible learning improves learning outcomes, increases student engagement, and enhances student satisfaction (Alraimi et al., 2015; Bautista & Valtoribio, 2024; Kuo et al., 2014; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).

In 2020, the Philippine Commission on Higher Education (CHED) issued guidelines requiring higher education institutions to employ flexible learning modes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, the Department of Education (DepEd) released a Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan that includes various flexible learning modes. The pandemic brought several challenges (Agayon et al., 2022; Caasi & Pentang, 2022; Gocotano et al., 2021) but also created opportunities for implementing flexible learning methodologies in the Philippines, including online (Giray et al., 2022; Lopena et al., 2021), modular (Agayon et al., 2022; Bacomo et al., 2022; Dangle & Sumaoang, 2020; Hamora et al., 2022; Roque, 2022; Tanucan et al., 2023), blended (Alvarez, 2020; Tupas & Linas-Laguda, 2020; Villanueva et al., 2022), and distance (Dimitropoulos et al., 2022; Joaquin et al., 2020; Roque, 2022) learning.

 

Bibliography

Agayon, A. J., Agayon, A. K., & Pentang, J. (2022). Teachers in the new normal: Challenges and coping mechanisms in secondary schools. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 4(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.4.1.8

Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers and Education, 80, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006

Alturki, U. T., & Aldraiweesh, A. A. (2021). Application of learning management system (LMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A sustainable acceptance model of the expansion technology approach. Sustainability, 13(19), 10991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910991

Alvarez, Jr., A. V. (2020). Learning from the problems and challenges in blended learning: Basis for faculty development and program enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 112-132. http://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/433

Ashrafi, A., Zareravasan, A., Savoji, S.R., & Amani, M. (2020). Exploring factors influencing students’ continuance intention to use the learning management system (LMS): A multi-perspective framework. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1475 – 1497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1734028

Bacomo, A., Daculap, L., Ocampo, M., Paguia, C., Pentang, J., & Bautista, R. M. (2022). Modular learning efficiency: Learner’s attitude and performance towards self-learning modules. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(2), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.54476/s149512

Bradley, V. (2021). Learning management system (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36

Caasi, N., & Pentang, J. (2022). Parental factors related to students’ self-concept and academic performance amid COVID-19 and distance learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7270542

Cassidy, A., Fu, G., Valley, W., Lomas, C., Jovel, E., & Riseman, A. (2016). Flexible learning strategies in first through fourth-year courses. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 9, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v9i0.4438

Damo, L. E., & Padagas, R. C. (2020). Can hybrid learning supplant the brick-and-stone classroom in teaching “strategies for academic success in college”? A focus assessment study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1711-1718. http://doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.080507

Dangle, Y. R., & Sumaoang, J. (2020, November 27-29). The implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippine secondary public schools [Paper presentation]. 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education, Dublin, Republic of Ireland. https://www.doi.org/10.33422/3rd.icate.2020.11.132

Davies, R. S., Dean, D., & Ball, N. (2020). Flipped classroom and flexible design: A pedagogical approach to improving student learning and engagement in a graduate-level course. TechTrends, 64(4), 582-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00489-1

Dimitropoulos, K., Mystakidis, S., & Fragkaki, M. (2022, September). Bringing educational neuroscience to distance learning with design thinking: The design and development of a hybrid e-learning platform for skillful training. In 2022 7th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEEDA-CECNSM57760.2022.9932939

Fabito, B., L. Rodriguez, R., O. Trillanes, A., G. Lira, J. I., Z. Estocada, D., & Q. Sta Ana, P. M. (2020, August). Investigating the factors influencing the use of a learning management system (LMS): An extended information system success model (ISSM). In 2020 The 4th International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3421682.3421687

Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 4544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554

Faradita, M. N., & Rahmawati, E. (2022). Pengaruh hybrid learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran tatap muka terbatas. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 8(3), 2641-2646. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jime.v8i3.3674

Giray, L., Gumalin, D., Jacob, J., & Villacorta, K. (2022). Exploring the online learning experience of Filipino college students during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(1), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i1.691

Gocotano, T., Jerodiaz, M., Banggay, J., Nasibog, H., & Go, M. (2021). Higher education students’ challenges on flexible online learning implementation in the rural areas: A Philippine case. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(7), 262-290. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.7.15

Hamora, L., Rabaya, M., Pentang, J., Pizaña, A., & Gamozo, M. J. (2022). Students’ evaluation of faculty-prepared instructional modules: Inferences for instructional materials review and revision. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 2(2), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v2i2.109

Joaquin, J. J. B., Biana, H. T., & Dacela, M. A. (2020). The Philippine higher education sector in the time of COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 5, 576371. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.576371

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A., Belland, B., & Schroder, K. (2014). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1687

Laswadi, L., Setiawan, M., Efyanti, Y., Pentang, J. T., & Taresh, S. M. (2023). Distance learning design: A problem-based learning with flipped classroom model through improving student learning outcomes and learning motivation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i2.63166

Lopena, G. L., Padilla, N. D., & Madrigal, D. V. (2021). Walking through a maze: The struggles of accountancy students with online learning in the context of the COVID-19. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(3), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i3.375

Mariano-Dolesh, M. L., Collantes, L. M., Ibanez, E. D., & Pentang, J. T. (2022). Mindset and levels of conceptual understanding in the problem-solving of preservice mathematics teachers in an online learning environment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.2

Navarro, M. M., Prasetyo, Y. T., Young, M. N., Nadlifatin, R., & Redi, A. A. N. P. (2021). The perceived satisfaction in utilizing learning management system among engineering students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating task technology fit and extended technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 13(19), 10669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910669

Oji, V., Dillion, K., & Weaver, S. (2022). Multi-inquiry hybrid e-learning: Instructor-learner experiences. Pharmacy Education, 22(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.221.5462

Palupi, M. E. (2022). The difference between synchronous and asynchronous online learning communication during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of English Language and Literature, 7(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v7i1.138

Pitogo, V. A., Gonzales, E. C., & Jaictin, J. F. P. (2022, November). PLS-SEM-ANN-based technique for understanding behavioral intention to use a learning management system. In 2022 International Conference of Science and Information Technology in Smart Administration (ICSINTESA), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSINTESA56431.2022.10041597

Raza, S., Qazi, W., Khan, K., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421

Roque, J. (2022). Modular distance learning in the area of education during the new normal: A systematic review. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 1(1), 66-82. https://journal.aide-inc.net/index.php/aide-irj/article/view/9

Santiago, C. S., Ulanday, M. L. P., Centeno, Z. J. R., Bayla, M. C. D., & Callanta, J. S. (2021). Flexible learning adaptabilities in the new normal: E-learning resources, digital meeting platforms, online learning systems, and learning engagement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5762474

Tan, R. R., & Ong, Y. L. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning for higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of a Philippine university. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 1-20. https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/jedte/article/view/15635

Tanucan, J. C. M., Alejandro, B. A., & Corcino, R. B. (2023). Towards an enhanced implementation of printed modular distance learning in the Philippines: A meta-synthesis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.21

Tupas, F. P., & Linas-Laguda, M. (2020). Blended learning–an approach in Philippine basic education curriculum in new normal: A review of current literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5505-5512. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081154

Tumasis, J. B. (2022, March). Web-based platform for Don Bosco High School–senior high school–technical vocational education track in adoption of hybrid learning. In Proceedings of The International Halal Science and Technology Conference, 14(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.31098/ihsatec.v14i1.485

Bautista, R. M., & Valtoribio, D. C. (2024). Flexible teaching-learning modality in mathematics education of a state university in West Philippines. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 16(3), 5-24. https://mtrj.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/34462/files/2024/07/Bautista-issue-53_v16_n3-p5.pdf

Villanueva, J. A. R., Redmond, P., & Galligan, L. (2022). Manifestations of cognitive presence in blended learning classes of the Philippine K-12 system. Online Learning, 26(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3021

Young, W.A., Allen, L., & Warfield, K. (2016). Developing online/hybrid learning models for higher education programs. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(6), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.6.180

Zakaria, W., Turmudi, T., & Pentang, J. T. (2022). Information and communication technology in elementary schools: A comparison between hybrid and face-to-face learning systems. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 46-54. https://journals.ums.ac.id/ppd/article/view/17534

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhang, R., Bi, N. C., & Mercado, T. (2022). Do zoom meetings really help? A comparative analysis of synchronous and asynchronous online learning during Covid‐19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(1), 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12740

Cite this chapter:

Pentang, J.T., Bucad, M.L. & Bautista, R.M. (2025). Flexible learning modalities in the Philippines: COVID-19 and beyond. In: M.S. Carandang (Ed.), Teaching & Learning Beyond the Classroom (pp. 34-47). Institute of Industry and Academic Research Incorporated. https://doi.org/10.53378/09.25.008

Find this book in:

Scroll to Top