Student engagement in higher education: Lecturers’ perspectives

Nirashnee Padayachee, Dipane Hlalele & Flip Schutte

Volume 5 Issue 3, September 2024

Abstract

This article, a stepping stone for further research, explored lecturers' perspectives on student engagement at a higher education institution (HEI). This qualitative case study was based on an interpretivist paradigm and Schindler’s conceptual framework on behavioural, emotional and cognitive indicators. A purposive sampling technique was applied to select eight lecturer-participants presently teaching compulsory modules in the initial year of the teacher education programme at a HEI in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A narrative interview, discursive informed conversations, and an open-ended questionnaire were used to generate data from all the participants. A thematic data analysis technique was employed. According to the findings, lecturers at the HEI understand student engagement as participation, which entails being interactively and meaningfully involved during lectures. This includes collaboration, co-construction, interaction, and metacognition. Considering the conclusion and the results, this study paves the way for further research that explores active participation through digital pedagogy. Such research is recommended to provide further insights into student engagement and inspire more contributions in this area.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Disclosure statement

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Data and Materials Availability

AI Declaration

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Alcine, E. (2019). Teachers’ Perceptions of Academic Performance and Student Engagement among Ninth-Grade Students. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Ali, M. M., & Hassan, N. (2018). Defining concepts of student engagement and factors contributing to their engagement in schools. Creative Education, 9(14), 2161-2170. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914157

Angelle, F. (2018). Leadership for Student Engagement. Doctoral Dissertation. Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw.

Anstey, K. (2016). Enhancing cognitive capacities over the lifespan. In Kendig, H., Mcdonald, P., & Piggot J. (Eds.), Population Ageing and Australia’s Future (pp. 165-184). Melbourne: ANU Press. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1rqc955.13.

Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2019). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846

Bond, M. & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528

Bowden, J. L. H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2019). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647

Casimiro, L. T. (2016). Cognitive engagement in online intercultural interactions: Beyond analytics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 441. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.729

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8^th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

Cronin, A. (2019, November). Supporting lecturers to monitor their students’ learning and develop their practice through engaging with mathematics support centre feedback. Swan Delta. Western Australia, Austrailia. In Conference Chair: R. Nazim Khan (p. 29).

Dary, T., Pickeral, T., Shumer, R., & Williams, A. (2016). Weaving student engagement into the core practices of schools. A National Dropout Prevention Center/Network Position Paper. National Dropout Prevention Center/Network. South Carolina, USA.

Davis, H. A., Summers, J. J., & Miller, L. M. (2012). An interpersonal approach to classroom management: Strategies for improving student engagement. Corwin Press, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387383

DuVivier, R., Ratliff, M., Gardner, B., Ouwerkerk, L., & Scacco, J. (2019). Perspectives on University Student Engagement in England. New York Journal of Student Affairs, 19(1), 3-16. rs, 19(1). https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/nyjsa/vol19/iss1/2

Frymier, A. B. & Houser, M. L. (2016). The role of oral participation in student engagement. Communication Education, 65(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1066019

Gaupp, R., Fabry, G., & Körner, M. (2018). Self-regulated learning and critical reflection in e-learning on patient safety for third-year medical students. International journal of medical education, 2(9), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5b39.d5a8

Gray, J. A. & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1).

Gurcan, F., Erdogdu, F., Cagiltay, N.E. et al. (2023). Student engagement research trends of past 10 years: A machine learning-based analysis of 42,000 research articles. Educ Inf Technol, 28, 15067–15091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11803-8

Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006

Madland, C. & Richards, G. (2016). Enhancing student-student online interaction: Exploring the study buddy peer review activity. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2179

Mathews, I. R. & Ebelelloanya, J. (2016). Open and distance learning: Benefits and challenges of technology usage for online teaching and learning in Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/2543

Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2016). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359

Olson, A. L. & Peterson, R. L. (2015). Student engagement, strategy brief. Lincoln, NE: Student Engagement Project, University of Nebraska.

Paradis, E., O’Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. T. (2016). Design: selection of data collection methods. Journal of graduate medical education, 8(2), 263-4. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00098.1

Pastore, G. & Luder, R. (2021). Teacher-student-relationship quality in inclusive secondary schools: Theory and measurement of emotional aspects of teaching. Front. Educ. 6, 643617. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.643617

Pather, S., Norodien-Fataar, N., Cupido, X., & Mkonto, N. (2017). First-year students’ experience of access and engagement at a University of Technology. Journal of Education, 69, 161-184.

Pianta, R. C. (2016). Teacher-student interactions: Measurement, impacts, improvement, and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622457

Peters, H., Zdravkovic, M., João Costa, M., Celenza, A., Ghias, K., Klamen, D., Mossop, L., Rieder, M., Devi, Nadarajah V., Wangsaturaka, D., Wohlin, M. & Weggemans, M. (2019). Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement. Med Teach, 41(6), 632-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1459530

Pickering, J. D. (2017). Cognitive engagement: A more reliable proxy for learning? Medical Science Educator, 27(4), 821-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0447-8

Quaye, S. J., Harper, S. R., & Pendakur, S. L. (Eds.). (2019). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. New York: Routledge.

Redmond, P., Abawi, L. A., Brown, A., Henderson, R., & Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175

Ribeiro, L., Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Gaeta, M., & Fuentes, S. (2019). First-year students’ background and academic achievement: The mediating role of student engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02669

Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

Schut, S., Heeneman, S., Bierer, B., Driessen, E., Van Tartwijk, J., & Van der Vleuten, C. (2020). Between trust and control: Teachers’ assessment conceptualisations within programmatic assessment. Medical Education, 54(6), 528-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14075

Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100

Varga, M. (2017). The Effect of Teacher-Student Relationships on the Academic Engagement of Students. Master’s Dissertation. Goucher College, Towson (Maryland, USA).

Vollmeyer, R. & Rheinberg, F. (2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence? Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00031-6

Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The maths and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008

Witkowski, P. & Cornell, T. (2015). An Investigation into student engagement in higher education classrooms. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 56-67.

Wu, M., & Ouyang, F. (2024). Using an integrated probabilistic clustering approach to detect student engagement across asynchronous and synchronous online discussions. J Comput High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09394-x

Zepke, N. (2014). Student engagement research in higher education: questioning an academic orthodoxy. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901956

Cite this article:

Padayachee, N., Hlalele, D. & Schutte, F. (2024). Student engagement in higher education: Lecturers’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5(3), 28-49. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353083