Artificial Intelligence in teacher education: A systematic review of its role in enhancing digital literacy and pedagogical content knowledge in STEM
Hassan Zahoor, Ayaz Ahmed, Junchao Zhang, Syeda Maria Zainab Gardezi, Wynn Marlar & Mohammad Naim Wahdat
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressively incorporated into teachers’ preparation and professional development in the Science, Technology, Engineering and Technology (STEM) fields. This systematic review examines how AI tools may strengthen STEM teacher education using content analysis and the PRISMA guideline. Four key AI tools were identified: AI-based augmented or virtual reality, intelligent tutoring systems, personalised learning, and lesson preparation. These tools have been indicated to profoundly improve teaching strategies, assist teachers in teaching learning process, and boost learning involvement in STEM classes. Despite their potential, there are still challenges that exist. These challenges include the compulsion for appropriate teacher preparation and training, issues related to data security and privacy, the sporadic generation of inaccurate or irrelevant answers by AI, and the lack of developed technology infrastructure in educational institutions. Moreover, AI-related content has also been neglected in the curriculum. Research gaps that require clear AI-generated data, more robust personal data protections, and AI tools that can be adapted according to the needs of individual teachers. However, this systematic review promotes the utilisation of artificial intelligence in STEM teacher education, identifying that it can improve instructional efficacy and promote professional growth.
Keywords
adult learning, STEM education, digital literacy, pedagogical content knowledge
Author information & Contribution
Hassan Zahoor. Corresponding author. Ph.D. Scholar, School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China. Email: zahoorhassanofficial@gmail.com
Ayaz Ahmed. Former MPhil Scholar, Center for Education and Staff Training, University of Swat, Pakistan Email: ahmadayaz223@outlook.com
Junchao Zhang. Professor. School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China. Email: zhangjunchao@hust.edu.cn
Syeda Maria Zainab Gardezi. PhD Scholar, School of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, China. Email: mariagardezi110@snnu.edu.cn
Wynn Marlar. Ph.D. Scholar, School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China. Email: naim_wahdat80@yahoo.com
Mohammad Naim Wahdat. Ph.D. Scholar, School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China. Email: wynnmarlar.lin@gmail.com
"Zahoor Hassan (first author and corresponding author) and Ayaz Ahmad (corresponding author) conceptualized and finalized the research framework. They also collected the data and interpreted the findings. All co-authors were involved in screening data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and they contributed to drafting and revising the manuscript. Zahoor Hassan and Ayaz Ahmad finalized the manuscript after incorporating revisions provided by the co-authors.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Funding
This work was not supported by any funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not Applicable
AI Declaration
AI tools were not used in writing this paper.
Notes
Acknowledgement
References
Abbas, T. (2023). Ethical implications of AI in modern education: Balancing innovation and responsibility. Social Sciences Spectrum, 2(1), 51–57. https://socialsciencesspectrum.com/index.php/sss/article/view/75/207
Acquah, B. Y. S., Arthur, F., Salifu, I., Quayson, E., & Nortey, S. A. (2024). Preservice teachers’ behavioural intention to use artificial intelligence in lesson planning: A dual-staged PLS-SEM-ANN approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100307
Al Ghawail, E. A., & Yahia, S. Ben. (2022). Using the e-learning gamification tool Kahoot! to learn chemistry principles in the classroom. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 2667–2676.
Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., Yitmen, I., & Homod, R. Z. (2023). Enhancing student engagement: Harnessing “AIED”’s power in hybrid education—A review analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070632
Amplo, E., & Butler, D. (2023). A learning programme based on TPCK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge), Constructionism, and Design to enhance teacher learning of the key ideas and competencies of Artificial Intelligence (AI). In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference Proceedings (pp. 1914–1923). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., Molefi, R. R., Adeeko, O., & Ishola, A. M. (2024). Examining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179
Bajaj, R., & Sharma, V. (2018). Smart education with artificial intelligence based determination of learning styles. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 834–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095
Basantes-Andrade, A., Cabezas-González, M., Casillas-Martín, S., Naranjo-Toro, M., & Benavides-Piedra, A. (2022). NANO-MOOCs to train university professors in digital competences. Heliyon, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09456
Beege, M., Hug, C., & Nerb, J. (2024). AI in STEM education: The relationship between teacher perceptions and ChatGPT use. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100494
Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791
Berry, A., Depaepe, F., & Van Driel, J. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. In International Handbook of Teacher Education: Volume 1 (pp. 347–386). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_9
Børte, K., & Lillejord, S. (2024). Learning to teach: Aligning pedagogy and technology in a learning design tool. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104693
Bouhlal, M., Aarika, K., Abdelouahid, R. A., Elfilali, S., & Benlahmar, E. (2020). Emotions recognition as innovative tool for improving students’ performance and learning approaches. Procedia Computer Science, 175, 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.086
Bucchiarone, A. (2022). Gamification and virtual reality for digital twin learning and training: Architecture and challenges. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 4(6), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2022.08.001
Cabero-Almenara, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2019). Adoption of augmented reality technology by university students. Heliyon, 5(5), e01597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01597
Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., Kajornmanee, T., & Chaipah, K. (2022). A personalized learning system-supported professional training model for teachers’ TPACK development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100064
Charania, A., Cross, S., Wolfenden, F., Sen, S., & Adinolfi, L. (2024). Exploring teacher characteristics and participation in TPACK-related online teacher professional development in Assam, India. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100227
Charoenthammachoke, K., Leelawat, N., Tang, J., & Kodaka, A. (2020). Business continuity management: A preliminary systematic literature review based on ScienceDirect database. Journal of Disaster Research, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2020.p0546
Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
Chatree Faikhamta, Kornkanok Lertdechapat, & Tharuesean Prasoblarb. (2020). The impact of a PCK-based professional development program on science teachers’ ability to teach STEM. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 43.
Chen, L., & Chen, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chi, M., & VanLehn, K. (2018). Eliminating the gap between high- and low-achieving students through meta-cognitive strategy instruction. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 9th International Conference, ITS 2008, Montreal, Canada, June 23–27, 2018 Proceedings (Vol. 9, pp. 603–613). Springer.
Conati, C., Barral, O., Putnam, V., & Rieger, L. (2021). Toward personalized XAI: A case study in intelligent tutoring systems. Artificial Intelligence, 298, 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103503
Copur-Gencturk, Y., Li, J., Cohen, A. S., & Orrill, C. H. (2024). The impact of an interactive, personalized computer-based teacher professional development program on student performance: A randomized controlled trial. Computers & Education, 210, 104963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104963
Dalim, C. S. C., Sunar, M. S., Dey, A., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). Using augmented reality with speech input for non-native children’s language learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 134, 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.002
Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132
Delamarre, A., Shernoff, E., Buche, C., Frazier, S., Gabbard, J., & Lisetti, C. (2021). The interactive virtual training for teachers (IVT-T) to practice classroom behavior management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 152, 102646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102646
Faresta, R. A. (2024). AI-powered education: Exploring the potential of personalised learning for students’ needs in Indonesian education. Path of Science, 10(5), 3012–3022. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.104-19
Fraunhofer, I. K. S., Heidemann, L., Herd, B., Kelly, J., Mata, N., Tsai, W., Zafar, S., & Zamanian, A. (2024). The European Artificial Intelligence Act. Whitepaper-EU-AI-Act-Fraunhofer-IKS-4.
Gerard, L., Linn, M. C., & Berkeley, U. C. (2022). Computer-based guidance to support students’ revision of their science explanations. Computers & Education, 176, 104351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104351
Ghoniem, R. M., Abas, H. A., & Bdair, H. A. (2018). Three-dimensional simulation system based intelligent object-oriented paradigm for conducting physics experiments. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.201
Grodotzki, J., Ortelt, T. R., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2018). Remote and virtual labs for engineering education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI project at the TU Dortmund University. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, 1349–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.126
Gutierrez, A., Mills, K., Scholes, L., Rowe, L., & Pink, E. (2023). What do secondary teachers think about digital games for learning: Stupid fixation or the future of education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, 104278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104278
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Asim, M., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hallberg, S., Hirsto, L., & Kaasinen, J. (2020). Experiences and outcomes of craft skill learning with a 360 virtual learning environment and a head-mounted display. Heliyon, 6(8), e04705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04705
Hastomo, T., Mandasari, B., & Widiati, U. (2024). Scrutinizing Indonesian pre-service teachers’ technological knowledge in utilizing AI-powered tools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1572–1581. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21644
Huang, Y., Richter, E., Kleickmann, T., Wiepke, A., & Richter, D. (2021a). Classroom complexity affects student teachers’ behavior in a VR classroom. Computers & Education, 163, 104100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104100
Huang, Y., Richter, E., Kleickmann, T., Wiepke, A., & Richter, D. (2021b). Classroom complexity affects student teachers’ behavior in a VR classroom. Computers & Education, 163(December 2020), 104100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104100
Hwang, G.-J., & Chien, S.-Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082
Iftene, A., & Trandabăț, D. (2018). Enhancing the attractiveness of learning through augmented reality. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.220
Ismail, A., Aliu, A., Ibrahim, M., & Sulaiman, A. (2024). Preparing teachers of the future in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Neural Network, 44, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.44.31.41
Janice, B. G., Agbong, A.-C., & Iris, J. G. (2024). Instructors’ presence and communication strategies on student engagement in asynchronous online classes. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.53378/353071
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Kamalov, F., Calonge, D. S., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074
Kong, S. C., Yang, Y., & Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328
Krippendorff, K. (2009). The content analysis reader. Sage.
Kumar, V. V., Carberry, D., Beenfeldt, C., Andersson, M. P., Mansouri, S. S., & Gallucci, F. (2021). Virtual reality in chemical and biochemical engineering education and training. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.05.002
Lalitha, T. B., & Sreeja, P. S. (2020). Personalised self-directed learning recommendation system. Procedia Computer Science, 171, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.063
Lamb, R., Neumann, K., & Linder, K. A. (2022). Real-time prediction of science student learning outcomes using machine learning classification of hemodynamics during virtual reality and online learning sessions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100078
Lan, Y. (2024). Through tensions to identity-based motivations: Exploring teacher professional identity in artificial intelligence-enhanced teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104736
Lin, X.-F., Chiu, T. K. F., Luo, S., Wong, S. Y., Hwang, H., Hwang, S., Li, W., Liang, Z.-M., Peng, S., & Lin, W. (2024). Teacher learning community for AR-integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 141, 104490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104490
Macariu, C., Iftene, A., & Gîfu, D. (2020). Learn chemistry with augmented reality. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.250
Marciniak, J., & Szczepański, M. (2020). Individualized learning in a course with a tight schedule. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2059–2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.242
Maun, D., Sharma, P., & Hung, T. (2025). Current trends and best practices of how in-service teachers can develop and apply PCK in social sciences. In Current trends and best practices of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) (pp. 213–236). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-8-3693-0655-0.ch008
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mnguni, L., Nuangchalerm, P., El Islami, R. A. Z., Sibanda, D., Sari, I. J., & Ramulumo, M. (2024b). The behavioural intentions for integrating artificial intelligence in science teaching among pre-service science teachers in South Africa and Thailand. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100334
Molefi, R. R., Ayanwale, M. A., Kurata, L., & Chere-Masopha, J. (2024). Do in-service teachers accept artificial intelligence-driven technology? The mediating role of school support and resources. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100191
Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Beginning and first-year language teachers’ readiness for the generative AI age. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122, 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103290
Mori, S. (2018). US defense innovation and artificial intelligence. Asia-Pacific Review, 25(2), 16–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2018.1545488
Moundridou, M., Matzakos, N., & Doukakis, S. (2024). Generative AI tools as educators’ assistants: Designing and implementing inquiry-based lesson plans. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100277
Moylan, R., Code, J., & O’Brien, H. (2024). Teaching and AI in the postdigital age: Learning from teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 153, 104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104851
Neffati, O. S., Setiawan, R., Jayanthi, P., Vanithamani, S., Sharma, D. K., Regin, R., Mani, D., & Sengan, S. (2021). An educational tool for enhanced mobile e-learning for technical higher education using mobile devices for augmented reality. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 83, 104030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104030
Nilsson, P., & Karlsson, G. (2018). Capturing student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) using CoRes and digital technology. International Journal of Science Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1551642
Ning, Y., Zhang, C., Xu, B., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. T. (2024). Teachers’ AI-TPACK: Exploring the relationship between knowledge elements. Sustainability, 16(3), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030978
Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Ozden, M. (2008). The effect of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching phases of matters. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 633–645.
Pannu, A. (2015). Artificial intelligence and its application in different areas. Artificial Intelligence, 4(10), 79–84.
Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41, 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8
Popkova, E. G., & Sergi, B. S. (Eds.). (2019). Technological revolution in the 21st century digital society vs. artificial intelligence. Springer.
Qiu, Y., Isusi-Fagoaga, R., & García-Aracil, A. (2023). Perceptions and use of metaverse in higher education: A descriptive study in China and Spain. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100185
Sanchez-Cabrero, Costa-Rom, O., Pericacho, F. J., Novillo-Lopaz, M. A., Arigita-García, A., & Barrientos-Fernandez, A. (2019). Early virtual reality adopters in Spain: Sociodemographic profile and interest in the use of virtual reality as a learning tool. Heliyon, 5(8), e01338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01338
Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2024). Investigating pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence perception from the perspective of planned behavior theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202
Schaper, M.-M., Smith, R. C., Tamashiro, M. A., Van Mechelen, M., Lunding, M. S., Bilstrup, K.-E. K., Kaspersen, M. H., Jensen, K. L., Petersen, M. G., & Iversen, O. S. (2022). Computational empowerment in practice: Scaffolding teenagers’ learning about emerging technologies and their ethical and societal impact. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 34, 100537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100537
Shibani, A., Knight, S., & Shum, S. B. (2020). Educator perspectives on learning analytics in classroom practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 46, 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100730
Shing, C. L., Saat, R. M., & Loke, S. H. (2015). The knowledge of teaching – Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 40–55.
Srinivasan, V. (2022). AI & learning: A preferred future. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100062
Su, J., & Zhong, Y. (2022a). Artificial intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100072
Sychev, O. (2024). Educational models for cognition: Methodology of modeling intellectual skills for intelligent tutoring systems. Cognitive Systems Research, 87, 101261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101261
Terzieva, V., Ilchev, S., Todorova, K., & Andreev, R. (2021). Towards a design of an intelligent educational system. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(13), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.474
Toro, C., Rios, S. A., Howlett, R. J., & Jain, L. C. (2024). 28th KES International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems KES2024 (Vol. 246, pp. 1–9). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.152
Tunjera, N., & Chigona, A. (2023). Investigating effective ways to use artificial intelligence in teacher education. European Conference on E-Learning, 22, 331–340.
Vujinović, A., Luburić, N., Slivka, J., & Kovačević, A. (2024). Using ChatGPT to annotate a dataset: A case study in intelligent tutoring systems. Machine Learning with Applications, 16, 100557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100557
Walshe, N., & Driver, P. (2019). Developing reflective trainee teacher practice with 360-degree video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.009
Wang, X., Young, G. W., Plechatá, A., Mc Guckin, C., & Makransky, G. (2023). Utilizing virtual reality to assist social competence education and social support for children from under-represented backgrounds. Computers & Education, 201, 104815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104815
Wilson, R. N., Holman, P. J., Dragan, M., MacPherson, R. E. K., & Beaudette, S. M. (2024). The effects of supplemental instruction derived from peer leaders on student outcomes in undergraduate human anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(6), 1239–1250.
Winkler, R., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021). Enhancing problem-solving skills with smart personal assistant technology. Computers & Education, 165, 104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104148
Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. Springer VS Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7
Cite this article:
Zahoor, H., Ahmed, A., Zhang, J., Gardezi, S.M.Z., Marlar, W. & Wahdat, M.N. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in teacher education: A systematic review of its role in enhancing digital literacy and pedagogical content knowledge in STEM. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 7(1), 50-82. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353317
License:
![]()
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Most read articles
- Social media usage and the academic performance of Filipino junior high school students
- Exploring the factors influencing commuters’ satisfaction and the use of public utility buses in Quezon City, Philippines
- A narrative exploration of romantic experiences and ideal relationship standards among Filipino Gen Z
- Students’ exposure to social media and their radical involvement on the societal issues in the Philippines
- ChatGPT integration significantly boosts personalized learning outcomes: A Philippine study
- Tiktok made me book it: The impact of Tiktok on tourism destination selection of generation Z and millennials in Manila
- Senior high school students’ awareness and literacy on computer software applications
- Self-perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness
- Enhancing financial literacy among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program beneficiaries
- Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy of university student leaders





