Civil engineering program compliance of SUCs in Western Visayas to Philippine Technological Council – Washington Accord standards
Paul Erwin S. Sarabia & Ersyl T. Biray
Abstract
This descriptive study determined the institutional status of the Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (BSCE) program of State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in Western Visayas in terms of years of implementation, AACCUP level of accreditation, the total number and educational qualification of the faculty, and level of practice of the program to the Philippine Technological Council – Washington Accord (PTC-WA) based on the nine (9) criteria. Data gathered through a survey questionnaire were presented in tabular and narrative presentations and were confirmed through triangulation using comparative analysis and review questions. Results revealed that the majority of the SUCs in Western Visayas had offered the BSCE program for 5-10 years, with Level II accreditation. Most of the faculty members are full-time and have master’s degrees, and the average passing percentage of the graduates in the board examination for the last three years was 75.55% as against the national passing percentage of 41.05%. As an entire group, SUCs in Western Visayas offering the BSCE program had ‘Very Highly Practiced’ the PTC-WA criteria on students and ‘Highly Practiced’ on all the other eight criteria of PTC-WA. As a whole, they had ‘Highly Practiced’ the nine criteria of PTC-WA. Consequently, respondents recommend to the SUCs management to pursue the development of the BSCE program by empowering its heads of units, faculty members, and support staff to cope with the improvement needed in terms of program educational objectives, faculty and support staff, continuous quality improvement, community-oriented programs, and industry-academe linkages.
Keywords
engineering education, institutional status, program compliance, level of practice, accreditation
Author information & Contribution
Paul Erwin S. Sarabia. Assistant Professor II, Aklan State University, College of Industrial Technology, Kalibo, Aklan
Ersyl T. Biray. Professor VI, Aklan State University, College of Teacher Education, Banga, Aklan
Disclosure statement
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
AI Declaration
Notes
Acknowledgement
References
Acredita CI (2018). Master Manual for the Washington Accord Accreditation for Science-Based Engineering Programs version 1.0. Chile, South America.
Amit, R.A. (2019). Evaluation of student development programs in the state universities and colleges of Samar Island. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3 (3), 474-477. e-ISSN: 2456-6470.
Asian Development Bank (2011). Improving instructional quality: Focus on faculty development. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
Bidad, C.D. & Campiseño, E.R. (2010). Community extension services of SUCs in Region IX: Basis for a sustainable community enhancement program. E-International Scientific Research Journal, 2 (3), 235-243. ISSN: 2094-1749
Ching, G.S. (2013). Higher education accreditation in the Philippines: A literature review. International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 2 (1), 63-74.
Chung, C. (2011). Changing engineering curriculum in the globalizing world. New Horizons in Education, 59 (3), 59-70. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ955545.pdf
Commission on Higher Education Memorandum Order (CMO) No. 92, Series of 2017. Commission on Higher Education, Philippines.
Commission on Higher Education Memorandum Order (CMO) No. 1, Series of 2005. Commission on Higher Education, Philippines.
Conchada, M.I.P. & Tiongco, M.M. (2015). A Review of the Accreditation System for Philippine Higher Education Institutions. www.researchgate.net/ publication/280918280.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Singapore: Sage Publications Asia-Pacific Pfc., Ltd.
Creswell, J.W. & Piano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Singapore: Sage Publications Asia-Pacific Pfc., Ltd.
Dotong, C.I. & Laquador, J.M. (2015). Philippine Quality Assurance Mechanisms in Higher Education towards Internationalization. Studies in Social Science and Humanities, 3(3), 156-167.
Fox, W. & Bayat, M.S. (2007). A guide to managing research. Juta Publications, p. 45.
Garcia, A.J. & Mazotti, T.B. (2016). Argumentation in Engineering Education. www.researchgate.net/publication/316504268.
Houston, D. & Paewai, S. (2013). Knowledge, power, and meanings shaping quality assurance in higher education: A systemic critique. Quality in Higher Education, 19:3, 261-282, DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2013.849786
Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka (2021). Accreditation Manual for Engineering Degree Programmes (According to Washington Accord). www.iesl.lk
International Engineering Alliance (IEA). (2021). Graduate Attributes and Competences.
Kamp, A. (2016). Engineering education in the rapidly changing world: Rethinking the vision for higher engineering education (2nd Revised Ed.). The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, ISBN: 978-94-6186-609-7
Kelly, W.E. (2016). Engineering education for sustainable development. In Brief for GSGR. The U.S.A.
Laguador, J.M. & Dotong, C.I. (2014). Knowledge versus Practice on the Outcomes-Based Education Implementation of the Engineering Faculty Members in LPU. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(1), 63-74.
Llenares, I.I. & Deocaris, C.C. (2018). Measuring the impact of an academe community extension program in the Philippines. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15 (1), 35-55.
Loyalka, P., Carnoy, M., Froumin, I., Dossani, R., Tilak, J.B. & Yang, P. (2013). The quality of engineering education in the BRIC countries [Working Paper]. Rural Education Action Project. www.reapchina.org/reap.stanford.edu
Mohamed, A. (2015). Innovative Pedagogical Practices in Engineering Education. www.researchgate.net/publication/295848532.
NUFFIC. Accreditation and quality assurance. https://www.nuffic.nl/en/education-systems/philippines/accreditation-and-quality-assurance
Philippine Technological Council (2016). PTC ACBET Accredited Engineering Programs. https://ptc.org.ph/accredited-engineering-programs/
Philippine Technological Council, Accreditation and Certification Board for Engineering and Technology, and Engineering Accreditation Commission (PTC-ACBET-EAC). (2014). Certification and Accreditation System for Engineering Education (CASEE), Criteria for the Accreditation of Engineering Programs in the Philippines, 2014-2015. https://ptc.org.ph/…/criteria-for-accreditation-of-engineering-programs-201-2015.
Philippine Technological Council, Accreditation and Certification Board for Engineering and Technology, and Engineering Accreditation Commission (PTC-ACBET-EAC). (2014). Certification and Accreditation System for Engineering Education (CASEE), Guidelines for the Preparation of a Self-Survey Report, 2014-2015. https://ptc.org.ph/.
Ryan, T. (2015). Quality assurance in higher education: A review of the literature. HLRC, 5 (1).
Seyfried, M. & Pohlenz, P. (2018). Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness. European Journal of Higher Education, 8:3, 258-271, DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2018.1474777
Vea, R.B. (2007). Importance of Accreditation of Engineering Programs to the Global Practice of the Profession. National Academy of Science and Technology, Philippines, 29: 348-355 ISSN 0115-8848
Wilson, T.T.& Marnewick, A.L. (2018). A comparative study of soft skills amongst the Washington Accord engineering degree graduates with industry expectations.” In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 1-6, DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2018.8436282.
Wo, A.M. (2018). A recent development at the International Engineering Alliance. In The European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education.
World Federation of Engineering Organization (WFEO). (2016). Model Code of Ethics under Canon 4 – Protection of the Natural and Built Environment.
Wormly, D. (2003). Engineering education and the science and engineering workforce. In the Pan-Organizational Summit on the US Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary. Washington (DC), USA: National Academies Press.
Xiaodong, S., Yanrui, J., Zhenchun, L. & Yu, S. (2018). Comparison of engineering education. International Journal of Higher Education, 7 (1), 98-102 E-ISSN 1927-6052
Cite this article:
Sarabia, P.S. & Biray, E.T. (2022). Civil engineering program compliance of SUCs in Western Visayas to Philippine Technological Council – Washington Accord standards. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 3(3), 98-119. https://doi.org/10.53378/352913
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Find this article in:
Most read articles
- Social media usage and the academic performance of Filipino junior high school students
- Exploring the factors influencing commuters’ satisfaction and the use of public utility buses in Quezon City, Philippines
- A narrative exploration of romantic experiences and ideal relationship standards among Filipino Gen Z
- Students’ exposure to social media and their radical involvement on the societal issues in the Philippines
- ChatGPT integration significantly boosts personalized learning outcomes: A Philippine study
- Tiktok made me book it: The impact of Tiktok on tourism destination selection of generation Z and millennials in Manila
- Senior high school students’ awareness and literacy on computer software applications
- Self-perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness
- Enhancing financial literacy among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program beneficiaries
- Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy of university student leaders