Curriculum and gender spaces in high schools in Eswatini

Gibson Makamure & Phumuzani Mpofu

Volume 5 Issue 3, September 2024

Abstract

This article makes a social constructionist exploration of student experiences of socially constructed curriculum in school spaces in high schools in Eswatini. The study utilised a qualitative narrative inquiry methodology. Individual semi-structured interviews and focus group were used to generate data. The participants were 24 purposively selected students (12 boys and 12 girls) from four high schools in Hhohho region. Participants ranged in age from 16 to 18 years. Contexts of subject knowledge and socially constructed curricula have shaped ideas about what constitutes a suitable education for girls and boys, as well as what subjects they should study. Subject suitability criteria have evolved, but there are still strong curriculum roots that drive the gender problem and disparities in accomplishment, where specific information has historically been associated with various groups. The study found that learners in other schools were free to choose subjects according to their abilities and without any influences from teachers. In those schools, girls even took up subjects perceived to be masculine, like agriculture and technical drawing. However, in other schools, teachers heavily influenced the subjects the learners chose. In most cases, the subjects were chosen according to femininity and masculinity. According to the social constructionism theory that guides this study, societal and interpersonal influences shape how people live their lives, as such, and subject selection by boys and girls is thus formed and informed across many settings and societies by cultural and social values.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Disclosure statement

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

AI Declaration

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42, 139-160.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 9(1), 26152.

Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1996). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday & Company.

Bermúdez Figueroa, E., Dabetić, V., Yuste, R.P., & Saeidzadeh, Z. (2023). Gender and structural inequalities from a socio-legal perspective. In: Vujadinović, D., Fröhlich, M., Giegerich, T. (eds) Gender-Competent Legal Education. Springer Textbooks in Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14360-1_4

Buenestado-Fernández, M., Ibarra-Vazquez, G., Patiño, A., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2023). Stories about gender inequalities and influence factors: a science club case study. International Journal of Science Education, 46(5), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2235456

Cislaghi, B. & Heise, L. (2020). Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociol Health Illn, 42(2), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13008

Cowger, T., & Tritz, J. (2019). Narrative analysis research: A tool for extension educators. The Journal of Extension, 57(6), 1.

Creswell, J. W (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Davis, B. (2018). Exploring the social construction of masculinity and its differential expression in culturally different populations using a mixed method approach. Theses and Dissertations. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1988

Dee, T. (2007). Teachers and the gender gap in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources. 42(3), 528-554. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998610396885

Eisenmann, L. (2023). Historical Considerations of Women and Gender in Higher Education. In: Perna, L.W. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06696-2_6

Elwood, R. W. (2016). Defining probability in sex offender risk assessment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(16), 1928–1941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15587912.

Elmore, A. L., Crouch, E., & Chowdhury, M. A. K. (2020). The interaction of adverse childhood experiences and resiliency on the outcome of depression among children and youth, 8-17 year olds. Child Abuse & Neglect, 107, 104616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104616

Fielding-Miller, R., Dunkle, K. L., Cooper, H. L., Windle, M., & Hadley, C. (2016). Cultural consensus modeling to measure transactional sex in Swaziland: Scale building and validation. Social Science & Medicine, 148, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.024

Galbin, A. (2014). An introduction to social constructionism. Social research reports, 26, 82-92.

Hadjar, A., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Priem, K., & Glock, S. (2014). Gender and educational achievement. Educational Research, 56(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.898908

Hagedorn, G. (2019). The socialization process of masculinity, and its manifestation at DePauw University: How race, media, and gender contribute to the malleability of masculinity. Honor Scholar Theses. 109, Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. https://scholarship.depauw.edu/studentresearch/109

Holloway, L., & Hubbard, P. (2014). People and place: the extraordinary geographies of everyday life. Routledge.

James, A., & James, A. (2008). Key concepts in childhood studies (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kachel, S., Steffens, M.C. & Niedlich, C. (2016). Traditional masculinity and femininity: Validation of a new scale assessing gender roles. Front. Psychol. 7, 956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956

Kring, S. A. (2017). Gender in employment policies and programmes: What works for women? Employment Working Paper No. 235. ILO.

Kuteesa, K.N., Akpuokwe, C.U. & Udeh, C.A. (2024). Gender equity in education: Addressing challenges and promoting opportunities for social empowerment. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 631-641. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1034

Lahelma, E. (2023). Controversies and challenges in the history of gender discourses in education in Finland. In: Thrupp, M., Seppänen, P., Kauko, J., Kosunen, S. (eds) Finland’s Famous Education System. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8241-5_16

Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W.K., Cross, Z.R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., Gorenstein, M.A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C.W., Ivanova, M.V., Jimenez, R.T., Jun, S., Kam, J.W.Y., Kidd, C., Marcelle, E., Marciano, D. … (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047-2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002

Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. Yale University Press.

Lorber, J. (2011). The social construction of gender (2^nd ed). Routledge.

Lundberg, S. (2020). Educational gender gaps. South Econ J., 87(2), 416-439. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12460

Ma, Y. (2011). Gender differences in the paths leading to a STEM baccalaureate. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1169-1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00813.x

Mazzuca, C., Borghi, A.M., van Putten, S., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R. & Majid, A. (2024). Gender is conceptualized in different ways across cultures. Language and Cognition, 16(2), 353-379. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.40

Matope, N., Maruzani, N., & Mukoni, M. (2011). Introduction to gender studies. Booklove Publishers.

Mbabane, Eswatini. (2018). Eswatini Nation Education and Training Sector Policy.

Mcpherson, E.M. (2012). Undergraduate African American women narratives in persistency in Science majors at PWI.[ Doctor of Philosophy in educational policy studies, University of Illinois]

Morrow, V. (2011). Understanding children and childhood (2nd ed.). Centre for Children and Young People, Southern Cross University.

Motsa, N. D. & Morojele, P.J. (2019). Vulnerable masculinities: implications of gender socialisation in three rural Swazi primary schools. SAJCE, 9(1), 1-11. http://.doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v9i1.580

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7^th ed.). Pearson.

Norozi, S.A., & Moen, T. (2016). Childhood as a social construction. Journal of educational and social research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n2p75

Nxumalo, K., Okeke, C. & Mammen, J. (2014). Cultural beliefs and practices towards HIV/AIDS amongst high school learners in Swaziland. Studies and Ethno-Medicine 8(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09735070.2014.11917628

Parmaxi, A., Christou, E., Fernández Valdés, J., Hevia, D., Perifanou, M., Economides, A.A., Mazaj, J. & Manchenko, M. (2024). Gender equality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: industrial vis-a-vis academic perspective. Discov Educ 3, 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00082-7

Pinar, W. (2011). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Pitikoe, S. (2017). Basotho herders learn through culture and social interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 13, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.03.003

Quenzel, G., & Hurrelmann, K. (2013). The growing gender gap in education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 18(2). 69-84. https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_ied_pdck/4

Roohani, A., & Zarei, M. (2013). Evaluating gender bias in the Iranian pre university English textbooks, Indonesian journal of Applied Linguistics 3(1); 115. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.194

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

Savard, D.M. (2016). The effect of gendered spaces on the gender gap in victimization: implications for private and public security. Wayne State University Dissertations 1586.

Sevilla, M.P., Luengo-Aravena, D. & Farías, M. (2023). Gender gap in STEM pathways: the role of secondary curricula in a highly differentiated school system—the case of Chile. IJ STEM Ed, 10, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00450-7

Slattery, P. (2013). Curriculum development in the postmodern era: Teaching and learning in an age of accountability. Routledge

Stromquist, N.P. (2007). The gender socialisation process in schools: a cross national Comparison: Radical shifts in university environments. Higher Education 53(1): 81–105. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000155587

Tamboukou, M., & Ball, S, (2006). Nomadic subjects: young black women in Britain. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 23 (3), pp. 267- 284. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630022000029777

Tetlow, S. (2018). Unruly School Spaces: An ethnographic exploration of year 8 students’ experiences of space, gender and well-being in South Wales secondary school. The Open University.

Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell. http://www.123library.org/book_details/?id=63971

Viklund, G., & Wikblad, K. (2009). Teenager’s perceptions of factors affecting decision making competence in the management of type 1 diabetes. Journal of Clinical, Nursing, 18, 3262-3270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02963.x

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & society, 23(1), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208326529

Winslow, W.W., Honein, G., & Elzubeir, M. A. (2002). Seeking Emirati women’s voices: The use of focus groups with an Arab population. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 566-575. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129119991

Xie, G. & Liu, X. (2023). Gender in mathematics: how gender role perception influences mathematical capability in junior high school. J. Chin. Sociol, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00188-3

Yarwood, R., &Tyrell, N. (2012). Why children’s geographies? Geography, 97(3), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2012.12094350

Cite this article:

Makamure, G. & Mpofu, P. (2024). Curriculum and gender spaces in high schools in Eswatini. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5(3), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353087