Effect of teachers’ attitudes on behavioral intentions toward the new curriculum implementation: Mediating role of perceived behavioral control

Thae Hsu Khine

Volume 3 Issue 4, December 2022

Abstract

In the education context, a small number of studies dealt with the effect of teachers’ attitudes on behavioral intentions toward the curriculum change in its implementation stage by the mediating role of their perceived behavioral control. Hence, this study specifically focuses on understanding the effects of mediating variables on the relationship between primary teachers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward implementing the new curriculum. The study investigated 627 primary teachers in Myanmar’s government schools in the region of Naypyitaw Union Territory located in the central part of Myanmar, during the academic year 2021-2022 using teachers’ attitudes questionnaire, behavioral intentions questionnaire, and perceived behavioral control questionnaire. Results revealed that teachers had positive attitudes and supportive behavioral intentions toward implementing the new curriculum. The findings also showed teachers’ attitudes had a significant positive predictive effect on their behavioral intentions (r = 0.5, p < 0.01). Moreover, perceived behavioral control had a partially mediating effect between teachers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward implementing the new curriculum. In the implementation stage of the new curriculum, the finding revealed the importance of teachers’ perceptions of behavioral control in enhancing their actual new curriculum implementation behavior. It also provided additional empirical evidence in the educational context and also for the policy-makers in education.

Keywords

Author information & Contribution

Thae Hsu Khine. Master of Education Graduate. Doctoral Student, School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China.

Disclosure statement

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

AI Declaration

Notes

Acknowledgement

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Berlin: Springer.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). Milton-Keynes: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.

Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1980). Factors affecting the processes of change. In M. M. Milstein (ed.) Schools, Conflict, and Change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Broadfoot, P., Osborn, M., Planel, C. & Pollard, A. (1994). Teacher and educational reforms: teachers’ response to policy changes in England and France. Education Resources Information Centre, ED380463.

Cottrell, S.P. (2003). Influence of socio-demographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behavior among recreational boaters. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503035003003.

Desombre, C., Lamotte, M., & Jury, M. (2018). French teachers’ general attitude toward inclusion: The indirect effect of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology, 39, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1472219.

Fleming, M. (1992). Teacher receptivity to teaching models. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona. Research Direct.

Fullan, M. (Ed.). (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Ha, A. S. C, Sum, R. K. W., Chan, D. W. K., O’Sullivan, M., & Pang, B. O. H. (2010). Effects of a professional development program on teacher receptivity and curriculum change in Hong Kong Physical Education. Educational Research Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 47-80.

Hayden, M. & Martin, R. (2013). Recovery of the education system in Myanmar. Journal of International and Comparative Education, Volume (2), Issue (2).

Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2017). ‘Introduction of New G1 Curriculum and Textbooks’. Press Release, JICA. https://www.jica.go.jp/myanmar/english/office/topics/ press170526.html.

Khine, T. H., Ping, L. T., & Jing, S. (2022). Teachers’ receptivity toward system-wide curriculum change in the implementation stage. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 12(2), 1-11.

Lall, M. (2020). Myanmar’s Education Reforms: A pathway to social justice? London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787353695.

Lee, J. C. (2000). Teacher receptivity to curriculum change in the implementation stage: The case of environmental education in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 95-115. DOI: 10.1080/002202700182871.

Lee, J. C., Yin, H., Zhang, Z., & Jin, Y. (2011). Teacher empowerment and receptivity in curriculum reform in China. Chinese Education & Society, 44,64-81. http://doi.org/ 10.2753/CED1061-1932440404.

Lin, Y. C., Liu, G. Y., Chang, C. Y., Lin, C. F., Huang, C. Y., Chen, L. W., & Yeh, T. K. (2021). Perceived behavioral control as a mediator between attitudes and intentions toward marine responsible environmental behavior. Water, 13, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390 /w13050580.

Ma, Y. P., Yin, H. B., Tang, L. F., & Liu, L. Y. (2009). Teacher receptivity to system-wide curriculum change in the initiation stage: a Chinese perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(3), 423-432. DOI:10.1007/s12564-009-9029-9.

McLaughlin, M. W. (2004). Implementation as mutual adaptation: Change in classroom organization. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (pp. 171-182). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Ministry of Education (2016). National Education Strategic Plan- NESP (2016-21). The Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.

Moroz, R. (1999). Teacher receptivity to system-wide change: The introduction of student outcome statements in secondary schools in Western Australia [Master Thesis, Edith Cowan University]. Research Direct.

Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2015). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006.

Rashid, A. M. & Pyng, H. S. (2019). Agricultural Integrated Living Skills teachers’ receptivity to assessment for learning practices in Malaysian Secondary Schools. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol.9(1), pp. 114-120. DOI:10.30845/ijhss.v9n1p13.

Shapiro, L. J. (2018). High school science teachers’ receptivity to the next generation science standards: an examination of discipline specific factors [Doctoral Dissertation, Northeastern University]. Research Direct.

Smith, J. R., Manstead, A. S. R., Terry, D. J., & Louis, W. R. (2007). Interaction effects in the theory of planned behavior: The interplay of self-identity and past behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol (37), No(11), pp.2726-2750.

Soe, M. Z., Swe, A. M., Aye, N. K. M. & Mon, N. H. (2017). Reform of the education system: Case study of Myanmar. Regional Research Paper. Parliamentary Institute of Cambodia.

Sommer, L. (2011). The theory of planned behavior and the impact of past behavior. International Business & Economics Research Journal, Vol(10), No.1, pp.91-110.

Thorsen-Spano, L. (1996). A school conflict resolution program: Relationships among teacher attitude, program implementation, and job satisfaction. The School Counselor, 44(1), 19-27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23897976.

Thura, M., & Khaing, N. N. (2020). Primary teachers’ attitudes towards new curriculum. J. Myanmar Acad. Arts Sci. 2020 Vol. XVIII. No.9B

UNESCO. (2014). Educational for All 2015 National Review Report: Myanmar.

Waugh, R. F & Godfrey, J. (1993). Teacher receptivity to system-wide change in the implementation stage. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 565-578.DOI:10.1080/ 0141192930190509.

Waugh, R. F. (2000). Towards a model of teacher receptivity to planned system-wide educational change in a centrally controlled system. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 350-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010373615.

Wedell, M. (2009). Planning for educational change: Putting people and their contexts first. London: Continuum.

Yin, H. B., & Lee, C. K. (2008), Curriculum Change: Theory and Practice. Taipei: Higher Education Publishing [Chinese]

Yin, H. B., Lee, J. C. K., & Jin, Y. L. (2011). Teacher receptivity to curriculum reform and the need for trust: An exploratory study from Southwest China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 35-47.

Zhang, K. (2018). Theory of planned behavior: Origins, development and future direction. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI), Vol (7), Issue 05, pp.76-83.

Cite this article:

Thae Hsu Khine (2022). Effect of teachers’ attitudes on behavioral intentions toward the new curriculum implementation: Mediating role of perceived behavioral control. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 3(4), 154-172. https://doi.org/10.53378/352952