This qualitative study, grounded in descriptive phenomenology, investigated the lived experiences of students studying in a private school under the Central Visayan Institute Foundation - Dynamic Learning Program (CVIF-DLP) framework. Through eight focus group discussions involving 62 participants analyzed with the use of thematic analysis, the research explored the advantages, disadvantages, and transformative potential of the CVIF-DLP approach outlined to the three learning domains. Findings revealed that students focus first on the tangible aspects of learning such as learning activity sheet and writing. They also believed that CVIF-DLP has limited special impact on their physical aspects but affects greatly their cognitive and affective aspects. Despite the varied perspectives and encountered challenges, students agreed that the program helps them improve intellectually and personally. It revealed the complex dynamics shaping student learning journeys, emphasizing the need for ongoing program refinement to address student needs effectively. The study offered valuable insights into educational innovation and pedagogical practices, guiding future efforts to enhance the educational experiences of the implementers of CVIF-DLP.
dynamic learning program, CVIF-DLP, learning activity sheet, parallel class, strategic rests, independent learning
Shidrex M. Gonzales. Corresponding author. Research Manager, CARD-MRI Development Institute, Inc., Philippines. Email: shidrexgonzales@gmail.com
Preciosa D. Villacruel. PhD. Dean of the Graduate School, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng San Pablo, Philippines.
Abragan, F., Abarcas, V., Aquino I. M., Bagongon, R.E. (2022). Research review on K-12 curriculum implementation in the Philippines: A generic perspective. European Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1-8.
Ambalegin, A. & Handayani, N. D. (2023). Failure of Blooms learning domains in online learning: EFL learners’ perspectives. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 8(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.8.1.68-83
Alkhawaldeh, M. A. & Khasawneh, M. A. (2023). The influence of cognitive load and learning styles on personalized learning outcomes: An untapped variable perspective. Migration Letters 20(S4), 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS4.4472
Asenorio, V.M., Dela Rosa L., Dinagsao, D. M., Laranio, H., Miague, B. D., Polestico, J., & Ucang, J. (2022). Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and student’s academic performance on dynamic learning program. International Journal of Applied Science and Research 5(4), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.56293/IJASR.2022.5403
Basilio, M. A. (2009). The adaptation of the dynamic learning program. ADDU-SAS Graduate Research Journal, 5(1).
Belawati, T., Daryono, D., Sugilar, S., & Kusmawan, U. (2023). Development of an instrument to assess independent online learning readiness of high school students in Indonesia. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 18(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2022-0139
Bernido, C.C., Bernido, M.V. (2020). Essentials over peripherals: The CVIF dynamic learning program. In: Panth, B., Maclean, R. (eds) Anticipating and Preparing for Emerging Skills and Jobs. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 55. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7018-6_9
Bradbury-Jones, C., Sambrook, S., & Irvine, F. (2009). The phenomenological focus group: An oxymoron? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(3), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04922.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cheng, F., Wu, C., & Su, P. (2021). The impact of collaborative learning and personality on satisfaction in innovative teaching context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713497
Chi, C. (2023, August 29). ‘Glaring’ teacher shortage on school opening day needs ‘strategic’ solutions — lawmaker. Philstar Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/08/29/2292294/glaring-teacher-shortage-school-opening-day-needs-strategic-solutions-lawmaker
Chi, C. (2023, December 6). Philippines still lags behind world in math, reading and science — PISA 2022. Philstar Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/06/2316732/philippines-still-lags-behind-world-math-reading-and-science-pisa-2022
EDCOM 2. (2023, September 26). Villanueva flags unfilled positions, teacher shortage in DepEd. https://edcom2.gov.ph/villanueva-flags-unfilled-positions-teacher-shortage-in-deped/#:~:text=Teacher%2Dstudent%20ratio%20lower%20than%20ideal&text=Mercado%20noted%20that%20the%20ideal,%3A40%E2%80%9D%2C%20she%20said
Emig, J. (2020). Writing as a mode of learning. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 89–96). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003059219-10
Field, R., Duffy, J., & Huggins, A. (2015). Teaching independent learning skills in the first year: A positive psychology strategy for promoting law student well-being. Journal of Learning Design, 8(2), 1-10.
Filoteo, M. (2021, September 26). The Philippine Education System in Crisis. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pids.gov.ph/details/the-philippine-education-system-in-crisis
Ines, J. (2023, December 7). PISA result indicates PH education system is 5 to 6 years behind – DepEd. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/deped-reaction-statement-program-international-student-assessment-result-2022/
Livingston, K. (2012). Independent Learning. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_895
Madrazo, A.L., & Dio, R.V. (2020). Contextualized learning modules in bridging students’ learning gaps in calculus with analytic geometry through independent learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 457-476. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12456.457-476
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education 9(3).
McMullen, K. (2022, May 24). Innovative teaching strategies: Nine technique for success. Education Advanced. https://educationadvanced.com/resources/blog/innovative-teaching-strategies-nine-techniques-for-success/
Mishra L. (2016). Focus group discussion in qualitative research. TechnoLearn, 6(1), 1-5.
Main, P. (2021, June 20). Blooms taxonomy. Structural Learning. https://www.structural-learning.com/post/blooms-taxonomy-a-teachers-alternative
Meyer, B., Haywood, N., Sachdev, D., & Faraday S. (2008). Independent learning literature review. Learning and Skills Network. https://www.associationforpsychologyteachers.com/uploads/4/5/6/6/4566919/independence_learning_lit_review.pdf
National Economic and Development Authority. (n.d.). Goal 4 – Quality Education. SDGs – Philippines. https://sdg.neda.gov.ph/goal-4/
Rioferio, D. (2023, September 4). CVIF-dynamic learning program can help address education crisis. One News. https://www.onenews.ph/articles/perspective-cvif-dynamic-learning-program-can-help-address-education-crisis
Smart Communications (2023, February 1). DepEd hails PLDT, Smart for inclusive education, aiding face-to-face transition. Smart. https://smart.com.ph/About/newsroom/full-news/2023/02/01/deped-hails-pldt-smart-for-inclusive-education-aiding-face-to-face-transition
Schleider, A. (2022). Program for international student assessment. PISA 2022 Insights and Interpretations. OECED. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202022%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations.pdf
Sotto, J. (2018). Benefits and challenges of the dynamic learning program in selected secondary public schools in Mindanao, Philippines. International Review of Social Sciences, 6(10), 576-585.
West, J. (2023). Utilizing Bloom’s taxonomy and authentic learning principles to promote preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100620
Winstone, N., Balloo, K., Gravett, K., Jacobs, D., & Keen, H. (2020). Who stands to benefit? Wellbeing, belonging and challenges to equity in engagement in extra-curricular activities at university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420908209
Xu, R., Zhang, C., He, F., Zhao, X., Qi, H., Zhou, P., Zhang, L., & Ming, D. (2018). How physical activities affect mental fatigue based on EEG energy, connectivity, and complexity. Frontiers in Neurology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00915
Cite this article:
Gonzales, S.M. & Villacruel, P.D. (2024). Exploring students’ experiences in the dynamic learning program model. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5 (2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.53378/353051
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
