Assessing the efficacy of RoboTeach Extension Project on public school teachers
Michelle C. Gonzales, Edilberto Z. Andal, Delon A. Ching, Magdalena P. Gaffud & Eudora C. Tabo
Abstract
The integration of robotics in the education was one of the aspirations of the K-12 institution in the Philippines. The RoboTeach Extension Project was established to address the challenges associated with the implementation of robotics in K-12 education. This study explores the teachers' perception of the efficacy in the implementation of the project which focused on training the Department of Education (DepEd) teachers in San Pablo City Laguna, Philippines on the basic concepts and applications of robotics and automation. The topics and learning activities covered during the ten-day training were based on the self-assessment survey results on the level of knowledge of teachers. The study used a descriptive method of research using a quantitative approach and adopted the LSPU Extension Services Evaluation Survey Questionnaire to determine the respondents' perception of the level of project efficacy. The data were obtained from twenty-five DepEd teachers and analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency count, per cent, weighted mean and ANOVA. The respondents were highly satisfied with meeting expectations to attain objectives, training and workshop contents, learning activities, methodologies, instructional materials used, resource person and trainers, training management team, and training management team and training facilities and services. Further, there was no significant difference among their level of satisfaction from day 1 to 5 of the training sessions. Respondents viewed the training as very successful, as evident from the consultation and culminating activity. Thus, the sustainability on the implementation of the project was highly recommended.
Keywords
robotics education, roboteach extension project, K to 12 education, teacher training and development, curriculum enhancement
Author information & Contribution
Michelle C. Gonzales. Corresponding author. Instructor 1, Laguna State Polytechnic University- San Pablo City Campus
Edilberto Z. Andal. Associate Professor 5, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Delon A. Ching. Instructor 1, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Magdalena P. Gaffud. Instructor 1, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Eudora C. Tabo. Instructor 1, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Disclosure statement
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
AI Declaration
Notes
Acknowledgement
References
Agapito, L.G. (2021). Exploring the Exploits on the Instructional Conveyance of Robotics Course to the 4Cs of 21st Century Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology and Education, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp. 1- 18.
Agatolio, F., Pivetti, M., Di Battista, S., Menegatti, E., & Moro, M. (2016, November). A training course in educational robotics for learning support teachers. In International Conference EduRobotics 2016 (pp. 43-57). Springer, Cham.
Alimisis, Dimitris. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education,. Published. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1130924.pdf
Alimisis, D. (2014). Chapter Two Educational Robotics in Teacher Education: An Innovative Tool for Promoting Quality Education. The Teacher of the 21st Century: Quality Education for Quality Teaching, 14.
Alimisis, D. (2018). Teacher training in educational robotics: The ROBOESL project paradigm. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 279 290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9357-0.
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223
Assadi, N., Murad, T., & Khalil, M. (2019). Training Teachers’ Perspectives of the Effectiveness of the “Academy-Class” Training Model on Trainees’ Professional Development. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0902.03
Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
Bernstein, D., Mutch-Jones, K., Cassidy, M., & Hamner, E. (2020). Teaching with robotics: creating and implementing integrated units in middle school subjects. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–16. 10.1080/15391523.2020.1816864
Berry, C. A., Remy, S. L., & Rogers, T. E. (2016). Robotics for All Ages: A Standard Robotics Curriculum for K-16. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(2), 40–46. doi:10.1109/mra.2016.2534240
Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2014). How robots can affect human behavior: Investigating the effects of robotic displays of protest and distress. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3), 343-355.
CEDEFOP & European Commission. (2016). Guiding principles on professional development of trainers in vocational education and training. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved, 5.
Chang, C. C., & Chen, Y. (2018). The Impact of an Integrated Robotics STEM Course with a Sailboat Topic on High School Students’ Perceptions of Integrative STEM, Interest, and Career Orientation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94314
Coşkunserçe, O. (2021). Implementing teacher-centered robotics activities in science lessons: The effect on motivation, satisfaction and science skills. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 50-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021067231
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Datteri, E., Zecca, L., Laudisa, F., & Castiglioni, M. (2013). Learning to explain: the role of educational robots in science education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 29-38.
DeCoito, I., & Richardson, T. (2018). Teachers and technology: Present practice and future directions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2). https://citejournal.org/volume-18/issue-2-18/science/teachers-and-technology-present-practice-and-future-directions
Du, G., Wang, Z., & Li, Z. (2020). A new cloud robots training method using cooperative learning. IEEE Access, 8, 20838-20848.
Eguchi, A. (2017). Bringing Robotics in Classrooms. Robotics in STEM Education, 3–31. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_1
Flores, Vega Rishelline Anne (2006). Effects of using educational robotics at the elementary school level . Theses Digitization Project. 3059. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/
Frangou, S., Papanikolaou, K., Aravecchia, L., Montel, L., Ionita, S., Arlegui, J., Pina, A., Menegatti, E., Moro, M., Fava, N., & Monfalcon, S. (2008). Representative examples of implementing educational robotics in school based on the constructivist approach. Proceeding of the 2008 conference on simulation, modeling and programming for autonomous robots, (pp. 54–65).
Gerecke, U., & Wagner, B. (2007). The Challenges and Benefits of Using Robots in Higher Education. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 13(1), 2943. doi:10.1080/10798587.2007.10642948
Goh, Henry & Baharuddin, Aris (2007). Using robotics in education : Lessons learned and learning experiences. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention.
Gonzales, M., Andal, E., Tabo. E., Ofrin, D., Gaffud, M., Serrano, R. & Castillo, A. (2020). Training Needs Analysis of K-12 Teachers on Robotics Education: Basis for the Implementation of RoboTeach Extension Project. APCoRE 2020 International Virtual Conference. Asia Pacific Consortium of Researchers and Educators.
Gokcearslan, S., Erdogdu, F., Ozturk, H., & Alper, A. (2018). An Emerging Topic in Information and Communication Technologies Education: Robotics Education Based On Teachers’ Experience and Opinions in Turkey. ISERD International Conference, Manila, Philippines. ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/
He, Yanna & Liang, Liying. (2019). Application of Robotics in Higher Education in Industry 4.0 Era. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 7. 1612-1622. 0.13189/ujer.2019.070715.
Iyewa, V. I., & Gberevbie, D. E. (2017). Staff training and organizational goals attainment: a study of Airtel Nigeria Networks. Covenant University Journal of Politics and International Affairs, 5(1).
Javed, S. M., Muneer, S., & Anuar, M. A. (2013). Impact of Training on Expectation of Employee and Employer: A comparative study. Information Management and Business Review, 5(12), 601-607.
Jomento-Cruz, Ingrid Lorelei (2010). Robotics as a Means of Increasing Student Achievement in Middle School Science. LSU Master’s Theses. 4044. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/
Jones, A. M. (2003). The use and abuse of PowerPoint in Teaching and Learning in the Life Sciences: A Personal Overview. Bioscience Education, 2(1), 1-13.
Kaloti-Hallak, F. (2014, July). The effect of robotics activities on students’ learning and attitudes. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research (pp. 153-154).
Karim, M. E., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015). A review: Can robots reshape K–12 STEM education? In Proceeding of 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO). Lyon, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2015.7428217
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
Kubilinskiene, S., Zilinskiene, I., Dagiene, V., & Sinkevièius, V. (2017). Applying robotics in school education: A systematic review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 5(1), 50- 69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2017.5.1.04
Leeuw, Frans (2009). Impact Evaluations and Development. NONIE Guidance on Impact Evaluation. Independent Evaluation Group. https://www.oecd.org/
López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., & Parra-González, M. E. (2021). Robotics in Education: A Scientific Mapping of the Literature in Web of Science. Electronics, 10(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030291
Miller D.P., & Nourbakhsh I. (2016) Robotics for Education. In: Siciliano B., Khatib O. (eds) Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_79
Montemayor, M. T. & Sevilla (2018, July 8). Why include robotics in PH school curriculum. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1040784
Mouhamad, Abdelrahim el (2019). Educational Robotics is a Useful Tool in Education. https://www.researchgate.net/
Nall, Mark. (2016). “Robotics in the classroom: The effectiveness of robotics based curriculum in STEM education. UNI ScholarWorks. Graduate Research Paper.88
Negrini, L. (2018). Teacher Training in Educational Robotics. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 92–97. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97085-1_10
Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2019). Humanoid Robots as Teachers and a Proposed Code of Practice. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00125
Ntemngwa, C. & Oliver, J.S. (2018). The Implementation of Integrated Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Instruction using Robotics in the Middle School Science Classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 6(1), 12-40. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.380617
Nurbekova, Z. K., Mukhamediyeva, K. M., Davletova, A. H., & Kasymova, A. H. (2018). Methodological system of educational robotics training: Systematic literature review. Espacios, 39(15), 28-28.
OECD (2008). New millennium learners: a project in progress optimising learning: implications of learning sciences research. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/39/51/40554230.pdf
Oludeyi, Olukunle. (2018). The Importance of Feedback System in Training Programmes: An Empirical Investigation. 2.
Ospennikova, E., Ershov, M., & Iljin, I. (2015). Educational robotics as an inovative educational technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 18-26.
Papadakis, S.; Vaiopoulou, J.; Sifaki, E.; Stamovlasis, D.; Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Attitudes towards the Use of Educational Robotics: Exploring Pre-Service and In-Service Early Childhood Teacher Profiles. Educ. Sci. 11, 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050204
PBOT 2018 Entry Level Mobile Robot Controller – Introduction. (n.d.). Retrieved August 14, 2021, from https://www.e-gizmo.net/
Peersman, G. (2015). Impact evaluation. Better Evaluation.
Pentang, J.T. (2021). Impact Assessment and Clients’ Feedback towards MATHEMATICS Project Implementation. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 90 – 103.
Sahin, G., Funda, E. & Ayfer, A. (2018). An Emerging Topic in Information and Communication Technologies Education: Robotics Education Based On Teachers’ Experience and Opinions in Turkey, ResearchGate, ISERD International Conference, Manila, Philippines.
Sánchez, H., Martínez, L. S., & González, J. D. (2019). Educational Robotics as a Teaching tool in higher education institutions: A bibliographical analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1391, 012128. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1391/1/012128
Scaradozzi, D., Sorbi, L., Pedale, A., Valzano, M., & Vergine, C. (2015). Teaching robotics at the primary school: an innovative approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3838-3846. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1122
Schina, D., Esteve-González, V., & Usart, M. (2020). An overview of teacher training programs in educational robotics: characteristics, best practices and recommendations. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2831–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10377-z
Sergeyev, A., & Alaraje, N., & Kuhl, S. A., & Highum, M., & Kinney, M. B., & Walker, J. (2016, June), Revamping Robotics Education via University, Community College and Industry Partnership – Year 1 Project Progress Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27340
Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2013). Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual levels. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 234-255.
Tallis. (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results (Chapter 4: Teaching Practices, Teachers’ Beliefs And Attitudes ed.). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/berlin/43541655.pdf
The Top Five Unexpected Benefits of Robotics in the Classroom. (2016, December 24). Getting Smart. https://www.gettingsmart.com/
Thomaz, S., Aglae, A., Fernandes, C., Pitta, R., Azevedo, S., Burlamaqui, A., Silva, A., & Goncalves, L. M. G. (2009). RoboEduc: A pedagogical tool to support educational robotics. 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Published. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2009.5350439
U.S. Department of education. (2017). Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. Http://Tech.Ed.Gov. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
Usman, Yunusa Dangara. (2016). Educational Resources: An Integral Component for Effective School Administration in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(13). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578024.pdf
Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201–216.
Wisshak, S., & Hochholdinger, S. (2018). Trainers’ knowledge and skills from the perspective of trainers, trainees and human resource development practitioners. International Journal of Training Research, 16(3), 218-231.
Ziaeefard, S., Miller, M. H., Rastgaar, M., & Mahmoudian, N. (2017). Co-robotics hands-on activities: A gateway to engineering design and STEM learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 97, 40-50.
Cite this article:
Gonzales, M.C., Andal, E.Z., Ching, D.A., Gaffud, M.P. & Tabo, E.C. (2021). Assessing the efficacy of RoboTeach Extension Project on public school teachers. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(3), 76-97. https://doi.org/10.53378/348742
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Find this article in:
Most read articles
- Social media usage and the academic performance of Filipino junior high school students
- Exploring the factors influencing commuters’ satisfaction and the use of public utility buses in Quezon City, Philippines
- A narrative exploration of romantic experiences and ideal relationship standards among Filipino Gen Z
- Students’ exposure to social media and their radical involvement on the societal issues in the Philippines
- ChatGPT integration significantly boosts personalized learning outcomes: A Philippine study
- Tiktok made me book it: The impact of Tiktok on tourism destination selection of generation Z and millennials in Manila
- Senior high school students’ awareness and literacy on computer software applications
- Self-perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness
- Enhancing financial literacy among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program beneficiaries
- Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy of university student leaders