Critical success factors of the flexible learning delivery as organizational innovation of one state university in the Philippines
John Vincent C. Aliazas, Julie Fe D. Panoy, Anna Liza P. Del Rosario, & Jocelyn V. Madrideo
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the whole educational system to collapse during the lockdown period. Hence, higher education institutions (HEI) led the change of learning delivery mode phases for effective and efficient academic services. This study describes the extent of manifestation on critical success factors (CSF) observed in one state university and determines the degree of organizational innovation practices in terms of technology-enhanced instructions. It also investigates the dimensions of CSFs that singly or in combination predict organizational innovations. The study purposively chose 251 faculty members from Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City, Philippines as respondents. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of Organizational Innovations. The findings reveal that five (5) constructs of CSFs were highly manifested (IUQDDI, ILT, IFCE, ISC & ITQ) among respondents and organizational innovations concerning technology-enhanced instructions viewed as highly practiced. Likewise, moderate to a strong association was seen between CSFs and organizational innovations. Furthermore, ISC, ILT, IUQDDI, and IFCE as the CSF construct were deemed significant predictors of organizational innovations. The results served as basis for organizations' future planning on the effective implementation of the learning delivery mode.
Keywords
critical success factors, flexible learning, organizational innovations
Author information & Contribution
John Vincent C. Aliazas. Corresponding author. Assistant Professor 1, Laguna State Polytechnic University- San Pablo City Campus
Julie Fe D. Panoy. Assistant Professor 4, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Anna Liza P. Del Rosario. Assistant Professor 4, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Jocelyn V. Madrideo. Assistant Professor 3, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Disclosure statement
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
AI Declaration
Notes
Acknowledgement
References
Adzharuddin, N. A., & Ling, L. H. (2013). Learning management system (LMS) among university students: Does it work. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(3), 248-252. DOI: 10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.233
Alharbi, I. B., Jamil, R., Mahmood, N. H. N., & Shaharoun, A. M. (2019). Exploring the relationships between organizational culture, management control system and organizational innovation. Global Business Review, 0972150919870341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919870341
AlQudah, M. K., Osman, A., & Safizal, M. A. (2014). Critical success factors of organizational performance: A study of small and medium enterprises in Jordan. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(6), 53-57. DOI: 10.9790/0837-19615357
Aminbeidokhti, A., Jamshidi, L., & Hoseini, S. A. M. (2014). The Effect of Total Quality Management on Organizational Innovation in Higher Education. International Journal of Research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 2(2), 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966667
Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J., Ritzen, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.001
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachersâ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1).
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2019). Factors That Influence Teachers’ Pedagogical Use of ICT in Secondary Schools: A Case of Ghana. Contemporary educational technology, 10(3), 272-288.
Caliskan, A., & Zhu, C. (2020). Organizational Culture and Educational Innovations in Turkish Higher Education: Perceptions and Reactions of Students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 20-39. DOI: 10.12738/jestp.2020.1.003
Callo, E. C., & Yazon, A. D. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing the readiness of faculty and students on online teaching and learning as an alternative delivery mode for the new normal. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3509-3518. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080826
Casey, A. C. (2005). A Learning-Center Solution for Using Technology in Elementary Music. Teaching Music, 12(4), 50.
Correani, A., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Natalicchio, A. (2020). Implementing a digital strategy: Learning from the experience of three digital transformation projects. California Management Review, 62(4), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620934864
Cowan, K.M., Haralson, L. E., & Weekly, F. (2009). The Four Key Elements of Innovation: Collaboration, Ideation, Implementation, and Value Creation. Retrieved from Stlouisfed.org website: https://bit.ly/3hpKf4j
de Oliveira, L. S., Echeveste, M. E., & Cortimiglia, M. N. (2018). Critical success factors for open innovation implementation. Journal of Organizational Change Management.
Espino-Díaz, L., Fernandez-Caminero, G., Hernandez-Lloret, C. M., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, H., & Alvarez-Castillo, J. L. (2020). Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on education professionals. toward a paradigm shift: ICT and neuroeducation as a binomial of action. Sustainability, 12(14), 5646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145646
Garcia, M. B. (2017). E-learning technology adoption in the Philippines: an investigation of factors affecting filipino college students’ acceptance of learning management systems. The International Journal of E-Learning and Educational Technologies in the Digital Media, 3(3), 118-130.
Glaser, P. (2012). Respondents cooperation: Demographic profile of survey respondents and its implication. In Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 195-207). Springer, New York, NY.
Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. The Higher Education Academy, 1-24.
Hinostroza, J. E. (2018). New challenges for ICT in education policies in developing countries: The need to account for the widespread use of ICT for teaching and learning outside the school. ICT-Supported innovations in small countries and developing regions, 99-119.
Imron, A., Wiyono, B. B., Hadi, S., Gunawan, I., Abbas, A., Saputra, B. R., & Perdana, D. B. (2020, November). Teacher Professional Development to Increase Teacher Commitment in the Era of the Asean Economic Community. In 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020) (pp. 339-343). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201112.059
Jez, S. J., & Wassmer, R. W. (2015). The impact of learning time on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 47(3), 284-306.
Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to policy makers. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467-483.
Kader, M. A. R. A., Mustapha, M., & Zaki, S. M. (2020). The influence of new syllabus and factors affecting student’s academic performance. Gading Journal for Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568), 23(02), 34-48.
Kidron, Y., & Lindsay, J. (2014). The effects of increased learning time on student academic and nonacademic outcomes: Findings from a meta-analytic review (REL 2014–015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED545233
Mabhungu, I., & Van Der Poll, B. (2017). A review of critical success factors which drives the performance of micro, small and medium enterprises. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v12n6p151
Muhammad, J. S., Isa, A. M., Samsudin, A. Z. H., & Miah, S. J. (2020). Critical factors for implementing effective information governance in Nigerian universities: A case study investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5565-5580.
Nogueira, F., & Marques, C. S. (2008). Organizational innovation: Research into the information/training paths of decision-makers within Hospitals. Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, 13(2), 237-254.
OECD (2016). Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies
and Skills, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en
Ogar, C. E., & Dushu, T. Y. (2018). Transforming Library and Information Services Delivery Using Innovation Technologies. Library Philosophy & Practice.
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Porto, A. E. (2020). Adopting e-learning technologies in higher educational institutions: The role of organizational culture, technology acceptance and attitude. Review of Social Sciences, 5(1), 01-11. https://doi.org/10.18533/rss.v5i1.143
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.
Reynolds, K. J., Lee, E., Turner, I., Bromhead, D., & Subasic, E. (2017). How does school climate impact academic achievement? An examination of social identity processes. School Psychology International, 38(1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316682295
Saunila, M. (2016). Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2014-0123
Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12. DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.
Wong, S. Y., & Chin, K. S. (2006). An Empirical Study of Organizational Innovation Practice in Electronic and Electrical Industry in the Greater Pearl River Delta (GPRD). The Asian Journal on Quality, 7(2), 50-68.
Yagyaeva, E., & Zokirov, A. (2019). The Role of a Teacher in Teaching-Learning Process. Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University, 1(3), 276-278.
Yazon, A. D., & Callo, E. C. (2021). Assessing Teacher’s Knowledge, Self-efficacy, and Practices (KSP) in Adopting Flexible Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 136-144. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2021.090115
Cite this article:
Aliazas, J.C., Panoy, J.D., Del Rosario, A.P. & Madrideo, J.V. (2021). Critical success factors of the flexible learning delivery as organizational innovation of one state university in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(3), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.53378/348736
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Find this article in:
Most read articles
- Social media usage and the academic performance of Filipino junior high school students
- Exploring the factors influencing commuters’ satisfaction and the use of public utility buses in Quezon City, Philippines
- A narrative exploration of romantic experiences and ideal relationship standards among Filipino Gen Z
- Students’ exposure to social media and their radical involvement on the societal issues in the Philippines
- ChatGPT integration significantly boosts personalized learning outcomes: A Philippine study
- Tiktok made me book it: The impact of Tiktok on tourism destination selection of generation Z and millennials in Manila
- Senior high school students’ awareness and literacy on computer software applications
- Self-perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness
- Enhancing financial literacy among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program beneficiaries
- Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy of university student leaders