Abstract
This study investigated the factors influencing student engagement in asynchronous online classes, focusing on the roles of instructor presence, communication strategies, and demographic profiles. Data were collected from 385 college students employing moderated mediation with parallel mediators. The results revealed significant direct effects of instructor presence and communication strategies on student engagement, highlighting the pivotal role of these factors in shaping the online learning experience. Specifically, stronger instructor presence and effective communication strategies corresponded to higher levels of student engagement, emphasizing the importance of fostering supportive interactions and facilitating meaningful communication in virtual classrooms. Mediation analyses further clear the pathways through which these factors influence student engagement. Perceived instructional support emerged as a robust mediator between instructor presence and engagement, underscoring the significance of establishing a supportive learning environment. Additionally, technology self-efficacy played a modest yet significant role in mediating the impact of instructor presence and communication strategies on student engagement, highlighting the importance of students’ confidence in utilizing technology for academic purposes. While moderation analyses did not reveal significant effects of demographic profiles on the relationships between key variables, the findings underscore the universality of effective teaching practices in fostering student engagement across diverse student populations. These findings have important implications for online teaching practices and educational policies, emphasizing the need to prioritize strategies that enhance instructor support, foster effective communication, and promote technological proficiency among students. By addressing these factors, educators and institutions can optimize the online learning experience and promote meaningful engagement among students in asynchronous online classes.
Keywords: asynchronous online classes, communication strategies, higher education, instructors presence, instructional support, student engagement
References
Abdillah, C. (2021). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous learning methods on student learning outcomes in higher education. Intelektium, 2(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.37010/int.v2i2.335
Aristovnik, A., Karampelas, K., Umek, L., & Ravšelj, D. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online learning in higher education: A Bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1225834
Asirit, L. B. L. (2023). Investigating the interplay of RAAT leadership qualities in shaping school leadership competence in the Bani Landscape. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 4(4), 186–215. https://doi.org/10.53378/353031
Asirit, L. B. L. (2024). From insight to measurement: A self-assessment tool development for entry-level teachers’ instructional competence. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.53378/353043
Balbuena, A., Bautista, M. G., & Pineda, F. (2023). Asynchronous connection: Exploring the impact of social presence, motivation, and satisfaction. International Journal of Recent Innovations in Academic Research, 7(5), 24–30.
Bandura, A. (1995). Social Foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prenctice Hall.
Barrot, J., Agdeppa, J., & Manzano, B. (2024). What it takes to teach in a fully online learning environment: Provisional views from a developing country. Online Learning, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3921
Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What is quantitative research? Definition, uses & methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/#:~:text=Revised%20on%20June%2022%2C%202023,generalize%20results%20to%20wider%20populations.
Birney, L., & McNamara, D. M. (2024). Students’ self-efficacy and confidence in technological abilities resulting from participation in the curriculum and community environmental restoration science (STEM + computer science).” Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p24
Bonanno, M., Canales, C., Lewis, D., & Martinez, P. (2023). Asynchronous communication tools. Academic Technologies. https://academictechnologies.it.miami.edu/explore-technologies/technology-summaries/asynchronous-communication-tools/index.html
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and Educational Technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Briones, M. R., Prudente, M., & Errabo, D. D. (2023). Characteristics of Filipino online learners: A survey of science education students’ engagement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111131
Chatterjee, R., & Correia, A.-P. (2019). Online students’ attitudes toward collaborative learning and sense of community. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1703479
Clement, L. M., & Bradley-Garcia, M. (2022). A step-by-step tutorial for performing a moderated mediation analysis using process. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 18(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.18.3.p258
Cowan, W. (2023, January 30). My teacher’s a robot: Beating negative perceptions when teaching online. THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/my-teachers-robot-beating-negative-perceptions-when-teaching-online
David, D., & Sava, F. A. (2015). Designs for studying mediation. The Encyclopaedia of Clinical Psychology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp516
Davis, F. D., & Granić, A. (2024). The technology acceptance model: 30 years of Tam. Springer International Publishing AG.
DeCamp, W., Horvitz, B., Garza Mitchell, R. L., Kowalske, M. G., & Singleton, C. (2022). Development of a self-report instrument for measuring online teaching practices and discussion facilitation. PLOS ONE, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275880
DeMarchi, J. (2023). Benefits and challenges of asynchronous learning. Kritik. https://www.kritik.io/blog-post/benefits-and-challenges-of-asynchronous-learning#:~:text=Lack%20of%20personal%20interactions,way%20to%20enhance%20student%20learning.
Dixon, J., & Lazenby, M. (2023). Expert panel content validation for evidence-based projects: Adaptation of the content validity index. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4360675
Dixson, M. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4).
Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Brophy, J., & Shea, P. (2019). Student satisfaction with asynchronous learning. Online Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1739
Eugenio, D. O., Sawi, K. J. I., & Sagud, R. (2024). Learning activities, platform, and support in online cohort graduate programs. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 16(1), 191–211.
Fabia, J. N. (2024). Students satisfaction, self-efficacy and achievement in an emergency online learning course. Research in Learning Technology, 32. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v32.3179
Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J. & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during covid-19. Front. Psychol., 12, 733554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
Fang, M., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Chan, B. (2023). Student engagement and satisfaction with online learning: Comparative eastern and western perspectives. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(5). https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3073&context=jutlp
Fernández Álvarez, M., & Montes, A. (2021). Student engagement in the online classroom: The student perspective. Medios Digitales y Metodologías Docentes: Mejorar La Educación Desde Un Abordaje Integral, 226–233.
Fernandez, C.J., Ramesh, R. & Manivannan, A.S.R. (2022). Synchronous learning and asynchronous learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 17(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-02-2021-0027
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2020). car: Companion to Applied Regression. [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=car.
Gallucci, M. (2020). jAMM: jamovi Advanced Mediation Models. [jamovi module]. https://jamovi-amm.github.io/.
Gamorot, J. J., Balighot, R., Circulado, S. J., & Loquias, A. (2022). Asynchronous online classes through the lenses of students’ experiences: Opportunities, drawbacks and proposed measures. International Journal of Research Publications, 112(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP10011211120224060
Garcia, M. B., & Yousef, A. M. (2022). Cognitive and affective effects of teachers’ annotations and talking heads on asynchronous video lectures in a web development course. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 020. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18020
García-Martín, J., Rico, R., & García-Martín, S. (2023). The perceived self-efficacy of teachers in the use of digital tools during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study between Spain and the United States. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030213
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
Germaine, P., Catanzano, T., Patel, A., Mohan, A., Patel, K., Pryluck, D., & Cooke, E. (2021). Communication strategies and our learners. Current problems in diagnostic radiology, 50(3), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.009
Ghazali, N. E. (2023). Engaging learners using discord application during signals and systems online class. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 33(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.33.2.244253
Göbel, K., Neuber, K., Lion, C., & Cukierman, U. (2023). Self-efficacy in online teaching during the immediate transition from conventional to online teaching in German and Argentinian universities—the relevance of institutional support and individual characteristics. Education Sciences, 13(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010076
Gopez, J. M., & Gopez, B. (2023). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and online student engagement among a sample of college students in the Philippines: The mediating role of self-regulation. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00728-y
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐based Approach. Journal of Educational Measurement – Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jedm.12050
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis a regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
Hung, C. T., Wu, S. E., Chen, Y. H., Soong, C. Y., Chiang, C. P., & Wang, W. M. (2024). The evaluation of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: student experience, learning outcomes, and cognitive load. BMC medical education, 24(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05311-7
Hussein, E., Daoud, S., Alrabaiah, H., & Badawi, R. (2020). Exploring undergraduate students’ attitudes towards emergency online learning during COVID-19: A case from the UAE. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105699
Isnawijayani, I., Zinaida, R.S., Handianita, G.R.V., Widayatsih, T., Rahayu, S. & Taqwa, D.M. (2022). Communication strategies in the online teaching learning process during pandemic covid-19. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 10(4), 619-627. https://doi.org/10.29210/183800
Kaeppel, K. (2020, December 28). Assessing learner needs, maintaining instructor presence, & building community in asynchronous courses. Graduate Certificate in College Instruction. https://gcci.uconn.edu/2020/12/28/assessing-learner-needs-maintaining-instructor-presence-building-community-in-asynchronous-courses/
Kannareth, T. (2022). Teacher communication strategy in online teaching. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Educational Study, 3(4), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamres.v3i4.352
Karakaya Özyer, K., & Altınsoy, F. (2023). Academic procrastination of university students: The role of problematic internet use, self-regulated online learning, and academic self-efficacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2023.11.1.459
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2021). Online student perceptions of their communication preparedness. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(1), 86-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020950873
Kumar, P., Kumar, N., & Ting, H. (2021). An impact of content delivery, equity, support and self-efficacy on student’s learning during the COVID-19. Current Psychology, 42(3), 2460–2470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02053-3
Ladyshewsky, R.K. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070113
Lange, C. (2024). Examining situational interest and its relationship with self-efficacy in asynchronous and synchronous video lectures. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00431-4
Li, F. (2022). “Are you there?”: Teaching presence and interaction in large online literature classes. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00180-3
Li, L. (2022). Teaching presence predicts cognitive presence in blended learning during COVID-19: The chain mediating role of social presence and sense of community. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950687
Liwanag, B. A., Padohinog, E. C., & Balsicas, N. W. (2022). Online learning satisfaction among college students from a higher education institution in Cavite. SDCA Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(1), 12–18.
Malkin, A., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Shayter, A. M. (2016). An investigation of the efficacy of asynchronous discussion on students’ performance in an online research method course. Behavior analysis in practice, 11(3), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0157-5
Mardiana, W., & Afkar, T. (2020). EYL teachers’ communication strategies in synchronous and asynchronous online teaching and learning. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 194–210. https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v7i2.6628
Medina, S. M., Adona, R. K., Cenita, E. A., & Camposano, S. M. (2024). Students’ preference in teaching-learning using new technologies: A conjoint analysis. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i21272
Nardi, N., & Hamilton, E. (2020). The relationship between instructional support, social presence, and student engagement in online learning environments (dissertation). ProQuest LLC.
Ong, S. G., & Quek, G. C. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 681–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09447-
Osman, S. Z. (2022). Combining synchronous and asynchronous learning: Student satisfaction with online learning using learning management systems. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(3), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i3.4103
Palama, J. C., Marcial, D., & Bucog, F. (2023). Teacher’s asynchronous engagement in an online distance learning. Telematique, 22(1).
Park, C., & Kim, D. (2020). Perception of instructor presence and its effects on learning experience in online classes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 475-488. https://doi.org/10.28945/4611
Parker, D.A.H. (2012). Community college students’ perceptions of effective communication in online learning. Dissertations. 817. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/817
Paulson, E. (2023, August 23). 7 steps to being “present” as an asynchronous online teacher. Faculty Learning Hub. https://tlconestoga.ca/7-steps-to-being-present-as-an-asynchronous-online-teacher/
Preisman, K.A. (2014). Teaching presence in online education: From the instructor’s point-of-view. Online Learning Journal, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.446
Ranganathan, P., Caduff, C., & Frampton, C. M. (2024). Designing and validating a research questionnaire – part 2. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 15(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_318_23
Ratan, R., Ucha, C., Lei, Y., Lim, C., Triwibowo, W., Yelon, C., Sheahan, A., Lamb, B., Deni, B. & Chen, V.H.H. (2022). How do social presence and active learning in synchronous and asynchronous online classes relate to students’ perceived course gains? Computers & Education, 191, 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104621
RCoreTeam (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org
Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors’ perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2330
Roque-Hernández, R.V., López-Mendoza, A. & Salazar-Hernandez, R. (2024). Perceived instructor presence, interactive tools, student engagement, and satisfaction in hybrid education post-COVID-19 lockdown in Mexico. Heliyon, 10(6), e27342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27342
Rosseel, Y. (2019). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.
Sakkir, G., Trisnawati, I. & Nurfadhilah, A.S. (2023). The benefits of the asynchronous online learning model at post-pandemic covid-19: Students’ perception. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v10i2.51636
Salarvand, S., Mousavi, M.S., & Rahimi, M. (2023). Communication and cooperation challenges in the online classroom in the COVID-19 era: a qualitative study. BMC medical education, 23(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04189-1
Sandoval, K. (2023). Capturing college students’ happiness in relation to their classroom engagement through Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas’ view. Research Square, preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2457960/v1
Scheiderer, J. (2022, July 27). What’s the difference between asynchronous and synchronous learning? Ohio State Online. https://online.osu.edu/resources/learn/whats-difference-between-asynchronous-and-synchronous-learning
Schoemann, A. M. (2023). Monte Carlo power analysis for indirect effects. https://schoemanna.shinyapps.io/mc_power_med/
Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
Sheridan, K. & Kelly, M.A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 767-779.
Singh, J., Singh, L., & Matthees, B. (2022). Establishing social, cognitive, and teaching presence in online learning—A panacea in COVID-19 pandemic, post vaccine and post pandemic times. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(1), 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221095169
Soetaert, K. (2019). diagram: Functions for Visualising Simple Graphs (Networks), Plotting Flow Diagrams. [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=diagram.
Thejamoviproject (2022). jamovi. (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org.
Varkey, T.C., Varkey, J.A., Ding, J.B., Varkey, P.K., Zeitler, C., Nguyen, A.M., Merhavy, Z.I. & Thomas, C.R. (2023). Asynchronous learning: a general review of best practices for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2022-0036
Wang, P., Luo, H., Liu, B., Chen, T., & Jiang, H. (2024). Investigating the combined effects of role assignment and discussion timing in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100932
Wang, X. & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies. Chest, 158(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Wang, Y., Stein, D., & Shen, S. (2021). Students’ and teachers’ perceived teaching presence in online courses. Distance Education, 42(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956304
Wang, Y.-S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00028-4
Watson, S., Sullivan, D. P., & Watson, K. (2023). Teaching presence in asynchronous online classes: It’s not just a façade. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3231
Watson, S., Sullivan, D.P. & Watson, K. (2023). Teaching presence in asynchronous online classes: It’s not just a façade. Online Learning Journal, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3231
West, R. E. (2021, January 1). Understanding how asynchronous video can be critical to learning success. https://edtechbooks.org/light_learning_2022/understanding_how_as
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Williams, K. (2023, October 30). Ethical surveys: A guide to responsible research. SurveySparrow. https://surveysparrow.com/blog/ethical-surveys/
Xie, J., & Correia, A. (2023). The effects of instructor participation in asynchronous online discussions on student performance: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13350
Yavuzalp, N., & Bahcivan , E. (2020). The online learning self-efficacy scale: Its adaptation into Turkish and interpretation according to various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 21(1).
Yu, Q. (2022). Factors influencing online learning satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852360
Zeng, H., & Luo, J. (2023). Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: a meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2197953
