Institute of Industry and Academic Research Incorporated
Register in
IJEMDS Cover Page
International Journal of Educational Management & Development Studies

ISSN 2719-0633 (Print) 2719-0641 (Online)

h-index: 11

ICV: 78.5

Mathematics self-efficacy and the use of virtual math manipulatives among pre-service teachers

Rency A. Arida, Rose R. Andrade & Rina A. Mabilangan
Volume 3 Issue 2, June 2022

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, instructors' pedagogy has been modified, and technology-based educational tools have been implemented. However, little is known about pre-service teachers' self-efficacy in mathematics and their intentions in implementing such technology. Thus, the objective of this study is to test if perceived mathematics self-efficacy is significantly related to pre-service teachers’ behavioral intention to utilize virtual math manipulatives. The aim of the study was addressed through the use of a descriptive-correlational research design with sixty-nine (69) pre-service teachers. Students' mathematics self-efficacy and behavioral intention to utilize virtual math manipulatives were assessed using researcher-made questionnaires. It was discovered that a significant association exists between the respondents' content self-efficacy and their behavioral intention to utilize virtual math manipulatives as to attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. A similar relationship exists between self-efficacy and behavioral intention to use virtual math manipulatives in terms of attitude and behavioral control. The results imply that applying virtual manipulatives is anchored on knowledge and confidence of process and purpose. Therefore, preparing pre-service teachers for the classroom through a variety of training and seminars will help them improve their mathematics self-efficacy while also increasing their intention to use virtual manipulatives.

behavioral intention, mathematics self-efficacy, virtual manipulatives, teaching and learning

Rency A. Arida. Teacher Candidate. College of Teacher Education. Laguna State Polytechnic University. San Pablo City Campus

Rose R. Andrade. Corresponding author. Faculty. College of Teacher Education and Graduate Studies and Applied Research. Laguna State Polytechnic University. San Pablo City Campus

Rina A. Mabilangan. Faculty. UP Rural High School. College of Arts and Sciences. University of the Philippines Los Baños

Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioral intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143-155.

Arnold, K.-H., Hascher, T., Messner, R., Niggil, A., Patry, J.-L., & Rahm, S. (2011). Empowernment through student teaching. Erziehungswissenschaftliche Revue (EWR). Retrieved from https://uni-salzburg.elsevierpure.com/

Bartolini, M. G., & Martignone, F. (2014). Manipulatives in Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 365-372). Springer Netherlands.

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).

Bates, A. B., Latham, N., & Kim, J.-a. (2011). Linking Preservice Teachers’ Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Mathematics Teaching Efficacy to Their Mathematical Performance. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 325-333. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00095.x

Bentley, B., & Bossé, M. J. (2018). College Students’ Understanding of Fraction Operations. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 233-247.

Briley, J. S. (2012). The relationships among mathematics teaching efficacy, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematical beliefs for elementary pre-service teachers. Issues in the Undergraduate

Carbonneau, K. J., & Marley, S. C. (2012). Activity‐based learning strategies. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman. (Ed.), The international guide

Carbonneau, K. J., Ardasheva, Y., & Zhang, X.S. (2018). Pre-service educators’ perceptions of manipulatives: The moderating role of mathematics teaching self-efficacy.

Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics67(2), 125-142.

Chun, Y, L., and Chen, M. J. (2015). Effect of Worked Examples Using Manipulatives in Fifth Grade Learning Performance and Attitude Towards Mathematics. Educational Technology and Society. 18 (1) 264-275

Cockett, A., & Kilgour, P. W. (2015). Mathematical manipulatives: Creating an environment for understanding, efficiency, engagement, and enjoyment. Teach Collection of Christian Education, 1(1), 5.

Corpus, B., & Salandanan, G. (2013). Principles and strategies of teaching. Lorimar Publishing Co., Quezon City, Philippines.

DesMarais, C. (2012). 15 Women to watch in tech. Retrieved from: http://www.inc.com/ss/christina-desmarais/15-women-watch-techstartups.html#11. [Accessed January 14, 2019].

Fast, L. A. et al. (2015). Self-efficacy and standardized test performance. Accessed on November 22, 2017, of http://rap.ucr.edu/efficacy.pdf

Ferla, J., Valcke, M., Cai, Y. (2015). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships.

Fraivillig, J. L. (2018). Enhancing Established Counting Routines to Promote Place-Value Understanding: An Empirical Study in Early Elementary Classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(1), 21-30.

Furner, J. M., & Worrell, N. L (2017). The Importance of Using Manipulatives in Teaching Math Today.

Grant, M.M. & Barbour, M.K. (2013). Mobile teaching and learning in the classroom and online: Case studies in K-12. In Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 285–292). New York, NY: Routledge

Hakim, L. L., Alghadari, F., & Widodo, S. A. (2019). Virtual manipulatives media in mathematical abstraction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012017

Hashmi, M., & Shaikh, F. M. (2011). Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Teacher Education on Motivation, Commitment, and Self Efficacy. New Horizons, 5(2), 54-58.

Kang, O. (2012). Teaching Mathematical Modeling in School Mathematics. University of Southern Iowa, USA

Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.

Kukey, Ebru, Habibe Gunes, and Zulfu Genc (2019). “Experiences of classroom teachers on the use of hands-on material and educational software in math education.” World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues 11.1 (2019): 74-86.

Lacobelli, E. (2019). Exploring the Mathematical Confidence and Self–Efficacy of Primary/Junior Pre – Service Teachers. Electronic Theses and Dissertations.

Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining Teachers’ Behavioral Intention to Use E-learning in Teaching of Mathematics: An Extended TAM Model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep298.

McCombes, (2020). Descriptive Research

McGuire, P. & Kinzie, M. B. (2013). Analysis of pace value instruction and development in pre-kindergarten mathematics. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5).

Mji, A., & Arigbabu, A. A. (2012). Relationship between and among pre-service mathematics teachers’ conceptions, efficacy beliefs, and anxiety. International Journal of Education and Sciences, 4(3), 261-270. doi:10.1080/09751122.2012.11890051

Mojavezi, A., & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 483-491.Available at: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.483-491.

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Bolyard, J. J. (2016). Revisiting the definition of a virtual manipulative. In International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 3-23). Springer, Cham.

Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (Ed.). (2016). International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives (Vol. 7). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Suh, J. M. (2012). Learning Mathematics with Technology: The Influence of Virtual Manipulatives on Different Achievement Groups. In Jl. of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching (Issue 1).

Osuna, J. B., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J., Llorente-Cejudo, M., & Ortiz, R. V. (2019). Difficulties in the incorporation of augmented reality in university education: Visions from the experts. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal)8(2), 126-141.

Perera, H. N., & John, J. E. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for teaching math: Relations with teacher and student outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101842

Perez, E. D., & Ye, Y. (2013). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement of mathayomsuksa students in the English program of st. Joseph Bangna school. Assumption Journal, 5(2), 82-92.

Plute, Kimberly. (2016). The effects of cognitive strategies paired with hands-on or virtual manipulatives on math instruction for students with mathematical learning disabilities to learn word problem-solving skills. retrieved from             https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2582&context=etd

Shin, M., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., McKenna, J. W., Hou, F., & Ok, M. W. (2017). Virtual manipulatives: Tools for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(3), 148-153.

Solheim, Ksenia. (2017). Importance of teacher learning for students’ achievement. https://laringsmiljosenteret.uis.no/reseach-and-development-projects/classroom interaction-for-enhanced-student-learning-ciesl/news/importance-of-teacher-learn     ing-    for-students-achievement-article127646-24409.html

Suh, J.M. (2016). Ambitious Teaching: Designing Practice-Based Assignments for Integrating Virtual Manipulatives into Mathematics Lessons. In International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives; Springer: Cham, Switzerland.

Sulistyaningsih, D., Mawarsari, V. D., & Hidayah, I. (2017). Manipulatives implementation for supporting the learning of mathematics for prospective teachers. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 824, No. 1, p. 012047). IOP Publishing.

Szabó, É., Kóródi, K., Szél, E., & Jagodics, B. (2022). Facing the Inevitable: The Effects of Coronavirus Disease Pandemic and Online Teaching on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Workload and Job Satisfaction. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 151-162.

Tabach, M. & Trgalová, J. (2019). The Knowledge and Skills that Mathematics Teachers Need for ICT Integration: The Issue of Standards. In Technology in Mathematics Teaching; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 183–203

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting researcher instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 1273-1296.

Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2001. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education27(4), 751-761.

Tucker, S. I., Lommatsch, C. W., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Anderson-Pence, K. L., & Symanzik, J. (2017). Kindergarten children’s interactions with touchscreen mathematics virtual manipulatives: An innovative mixed methods analysis. In International Journal of Research in Education and Science (Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 646–665). International Journal of Research in Education and Science. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.328097

Unamba, E., Ukeagbu, M. N, and Anulobi, A. (2020). Effect of Virtual Manipulative on Students Achievement and Attitude in Mathematics.

Unlu, M., Ertekin, E., & Dilmac, B. (2017). Predicting Relationship between Mathematics Anxiety, Mathematics Teaching Anxiety, Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 636-645. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1148432

Ursavas, Ö. F., Yalçin, Y., & Bakir, E. (2019). The Effect of Subjective Norms on Preservice and In-Service Teachers’ Behavioural Intentions to Use Technology: A Multigroup Multimodel Study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2501-2519.

Varol, F., Farran, D., Bilbrey, C., Vorhaus, E., Hofer, KG. (2012). Professional Development for Preschool Teachers: Evidence for Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240754.2011.638742

Walinga and Stangor (2014). Introduction to Psychology – 1st Canadian Edition

Youmans, A., Coombs, A., & Colgan, L. (2018). Early Childhood Educators’ and Teachers’ Early Mathematics Education Knowledge, Beliefs, and Pedagogy. Canadian Journal of Education41(4), 1079-1104.

Zilinskiene, I. & Demirbilek, M. (2015).  Use of GeoGebra in Primary Math    Education in Lithuania: An Exploratory Study from Teachers’ Perspective https://www.researchgate.net/

Zuya, Habila Elisha, Simon Kevin Kwalat, and Bala Galle Attah (2016). “Pre-Service Teachers’ Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Mathematics Teaching Self-Efficacy.” Journal of education and practice 7.14 (2016): 93-98.

Cite this article:

Arida, R.A., Andrade, R.R. & Mabilangan, R.A. (2022). Mathematics self-efficacy and the use of virtual math manipulatives among pre-service teachers. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 3(2), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.53378/352897

License:

ai generated, holographic, interface-8578468.jpg
library, people, study-2245807.jpg
bookshelf, books, library-2907964.jpg
Scroll to Top