Abstract
This paper studies the effectiveness of two different conditions of offering an e-learning leadership training for school leaders in Rwanda in a randomised controlled trial. We distinguish a trainer-led condition in which a trainer guides the school leader, and a peer-led condition that includes peer discussions among school leaders to facilitate the learning process. We look at multiple outcomes, such as participation rates and exam scores, as well as leadership skills, motivation and satisfaction of school leaders. Results indicate no significant difference between the two groups for most outcomes. For two modules, we find that peer-led school leaders perform significantly higher on both formative and summative assessments. Furthermore, it is observed that trainer-led school leaders self-report fewer e-learning barriers, and higher overall leadership skills. However, this self-reported observation was not confirmed by the teachers from their schools, who also assessed their school leader’s leadership skills. The results imply that that the peer-led condition outperformed the trainer-led condition, on all objective outcome measures. Given the much lower costs for organising an online leadership training in a peer-led condition, we can conclude that it does not seem to be worth it to make this e-learning training trainer-led.
Keywords: Evaluation, School leadership, Rwanda; E-learning, Peer-led, Trainer-led
References
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton university press.
Bruns, B., Costa, L., & Cunha, N. (2017). Through the looking glass: can classroom observation and coaching improve teacher performance in Brazil? The World Bank.
Brundrett, M. (2006). Evaluating the individual and combined impact of national leadership programmes in England: Perceptions and practices. School Leadership & Management, 26(5), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430601007931
Bush, T. and Oduro, G. K. T. (2006) New principals in Africa: preparation, induction and practice. Journal of Educational Administration. Edited by A. Walker, 44(4), pp. 359–375. doi: 10.1108/09578230610676587.
Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A. and Dochy, F. (2019) A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings, Educational Research Review, 27, pp. 110–125.
Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 7, 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0.
Glewwe, P., & Muralidharan, K. (2016). Improving education outcomes in developing countries: Evidence, knowledge gaps, and policy implications. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 5, pp. 653-743). Elsevier.
Global School Leaders. (2020). Evidence Review Report: A Review of Empirical Research on School Leadership in the Global South. https://www.globalschoolleaders.org/
Haelermans, C., Aarts, B., Cabus, S., Kirezi, J., Muramutse, R., & Peeraer, J. (2022). Effectiveness of two e-learning modalities for school leader professional development on effective school leadership in Rwanda. Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) Maastricht University.
Karareba, G., & Clarke, S. (2019). School leadership in challenging circumstances: The Rwandan narrative. In T. O’Donoghue & S. Clarke (Eds.), New Directions in Research on Education Reconstruction in Challenging Circumstances (pp. 121–142). Queen’s University Library. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/school-leadership-in-challenging-circumstances-the-rwandan-narrat
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School leadership and management, 28(1), 27-42.
MINEDUC. (2022). Basic Education. Ministry of Education. https://www.mineduc.gov.rw/basic-education
Mukamusoni, D. (2006). Distance Learning Program for Teachers at The Kigali Institute of Education: An expository study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v7i2.301
Mzuza, M. K., Yudong, Y., & Kapute, F. (2014). Analysis of Factors Causing Poor Passing Rates and High Dropout Rates among Primary School Girls in Malawi. World Journal of education, 4(1), 48-61.
Nguni, S., Sleegers, P. and Denessen, E. (2006) Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organisational commitment, and organisational citizenship behaviour in primary schools: The Tanzanian case, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), pp. 145–177. doi: 10.1080/09243450600565746.
Pont, B. et al. (2008) Improving school leadership. Paris: OECD.
Price, L., Richardson, J. T. E., & Jelfs, A. (2007). Face‐to‐face versus online tutoring support in distance education. Studies in Higher Education. 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601004366
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A. and Rowe, K. J. (2008) The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), pp. 635–674. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321509.
Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 66(5), 688.
Sabates, R., Westbrook, J., Akyeampong, K., & Hunt, F. (2010). School drop out: Patterns,
causes, changes and policies. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO): Paris, France.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2021). Lower secondary completion rate, total (% of relevant age group) – Rwanda | Data. The World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/
UNICEF. (2021). Secondary Education and Enrollment Statistics – UNICEF Data. UNICEF DATA. https://data.unicef.org/
United Nations (2014). The millennium development goals 2014. New York, NY: United Nations.
UR-CE (2019). Continuous Professional Development Programme in Effective School Leadership. Kigali: (Student Manual).
Woods, P. A., Woods, G. J. and Cowie, M. (2009). “Tears, laughter, camaraderie”: professional development for headteachers, School Leadership & Management. 29(3), pp. 253–275. doi: 10.1080/13632430902793825.
Yen, S.-C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between:
Comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5
