Impact assessment and clients’ feedback towards MATHEMATICS project implementation
Jupeth Toriano Pentang
Abstract
The Western Philippines University - College of Education's Project MATHEMATICS (Mathematics Enhanced Mentoring, Assistance, and Training to In-need and Challenged Students) was implemented as part of the Adopt-a-School Program to address the mathematical needs of Laura Vicuña Center - Palawan youths. To evaluate the extent of the project implementation, the study assessed its impact through the feedback gathered from the clients served. It specifically described the quality of project implementation, determined the attainment of project objectives, and enumerated client feedback. A concurrent triangulation mixed-method research design was used with 32 clientele samples selected purposively. The study utilized a survey, problem set test, and focus-grouped interview to obtain data pertinent to the study's objectives. The findings revealed an aspirational quality of the implemented project, improved mathematical performance, and the client's desire for ongoing mentoring. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed, along with recommendations for future extension projects, monitoring and evaluation, and re-planning activities.
Keywords
client feedback, extension services, impact assessment, mathematics education, project implementation
Author information & Contribution
Jupeth Toriano Pentang. Faculty, College of Education, Western Philippines University, Puerto Princesa City, Philippines
Disclosure statement
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data and Materials Availability
AI Declaration
Notes
Acknowledgement
References
Alcott, B. (2017). Does teacher encouragement influence students’ educational progress? A propensity-score matching analysis. Research in Higher Education, 58, 773-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9446-2
Andrew, S., & Halcomb, E. J. (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken. http://www.bwgriffin.com/
Anastasia, T. T., Skinner, R. L., & Mundhenk, S. E. (2012). Youth mentoring: Program and mentor best practices. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 104(2), 38-44. https://extension.colostate.edu/docs/4h/youth-mentor-practice.pdf
Balanlay, M. C. D. (2021). Constructivist teachers beliefs, instructional practices and students’ mathematics performance. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 17(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjom/2021/v17i130264
Bos, J., Harting. E., & Hesselink, M. (2014). Project-driven creation. The Insights Group Ltd.
Ceria, E. T. (2021). School-home learning clinic: An innovative project. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research, 5(3), 65-70.
Chiew, F., Petrus, C., Othman, S., Nyuin, J., & Lau, U. (2021). Effectiveness of peer tutoring program on students’ academic performance for engineering course. International Journal Of Service Management and Sustainability, 6(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijsms.v6i1.12879
Domingo, J. G., Ibanez, E.D., Subia, G. S., Pentang, J. T., Gamit, A. M., Pascual, L. E., Mina, J. C., Tomas, A. V., & Liangco, M. M. (2021). Cognitive skills achievement in mathematics of the elementary pre-service teachers using Piaget’s seven logical operations. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 435-440.
Harrin, H. (2016). 3 levels of quality. Project Management. https://www.projectmanagement.com/blog-post/19004/3-Levels-of-Quality
Harris, R., Miske, S., & Attig, G. (2004). Embracing diversity: Toolkit for creating inclusive learning-friendly environments. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Bangkok (Thailand). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED496229
Harvard Family Research Project. (2010). Partnerships for learning: Promising practices in integrating school and out-of-school time program supports. Global Family Research Project. http://www.hfrp.org/publications-resources/browse-our-publications/partnerships-for-learning-promising-practices-inintegrating-school-and-out-of-school-time-program-supports
Ibanez, E. D., & Pentang, J. T. (2021). Socio-constructivist learning and teacher education students’ conceptual understanding and attitude toward fractions. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 5(1), 23-44. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/irje/article/view/12187
International Organization for Standardization. (2015). Quality management principles. https://www.iso.org/
Kendricks, K., Nedunuri, K. V., & Arment, A. R. (2013). Minority student perceptions of the impact of mentoring to enhance academic performance in STEM disciplines. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 38-46.
Jucovy, L., & Garringer, M. (2008). The ABCs of school-based mentoring: Effective strategies for providing quality youth mentoring in schools and communities. National Mentoring Center. https://educationnorthwest.org/
Karki, T. M. (2018). Supplementary resource materials in English language classrooms: Development and implementation. Tribhuvan University Journal, 32(1), 251-260.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://libro.eb20.net/Reader/rdr.aspx?b=1995930
Laerd Dissertation. (n.d.). Total population sampling. Lund Research. https://dissertation.laerd.com/
Landau, P. (2018, January 30). How to improve your project evaluation process. Project Manager. https://www.projectmanager.com/
Lazo, D. D., & De Guzman, M. F. D. (2021). Strategic intervention material: A learning approach in teaching economics during the distance education. International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends, 8(5), 76-84. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3861794
Lerner, R. M. (2007). The good teen: Rescuing adolescence from the myths of the storm and stress years. Stonesong Press.
Levine, R. (2021). 5 reasons why evaluation matters to your project. National Institute for Children’s Health Quality. https://www.nichq.org/insight/5-reasons-why-evaluation-matters-your-project
Mahler, D., Grobschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2018). Does motivation matter? – The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and enthusiasm and students’ performance. PloS one, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207252
Maiyani, N. J. (2017). Committed teacher: Teacher commitment and dedication to student learning. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 4(4), 109-110. http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_497.pdf
Miller, B. (n.d.). The purpose of project management and setting objectives. ProjectSmart. https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/purpose-of-project-management-and-setting-objectives.php
Ngaka, M. J., & Zwane, E. M. (2018). The role of partnerships in agricultural extension service delivery: A study conducted in provincial departments of agriculture in South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 46(1), 14-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2018/v46n1a399
Nguyen, M. (2013). Peer tutoring as a strategy to promote academic success. Duke University. Research Brief. https://childandfamilypolicy.duke.edu/
Peersman, G. (2015). Impact evaluation. Better Evaluation. http://www.betterevaluation.org/
Pentang, J. T., Bautista, R. M., Pizaña, A. D., Egger, S. P. (2020). Mathematical needs of Laura Vicuña Learners. WPU Graduate Journal, 5(1), 78-81.
Pentang, J. T., Ibanez , E. D., Subia, G. S., Domingo, J. G., Gamit, A. M., & Pascual, L. E. (2021). Problem-solving performance and skills of prospective elementary teachers in Northern Philippines. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(1), 122-132.
Pizana, A. D., Pizaña, R. E. C., Pogoy, A. M., & Pentang, J. T. (2021). Lived Experiences of Extension Project Implementers Amidst COVID-19 pandemic: The unspoken frontliners. European Scholar Journal, 2(4), 431-436.
Preston, V. (2009). Questionnaire survey. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/questionnaire-survey
Ramos, R. R. S., Baking, E. G., Quiambao, D. T., Nicdao, R. C., Nuqui, A. V., Cruz, R. C. (2015). The reading comprehension and mathematics proficiency level of high school students and their correlates. Journal of Business & Management Studies, 1(2), 1-7.
SEI-DOST & MATHTED. (2011). Mathematics framework for Philippine basic education. Science Education Institute, Department of Science and Technology (SEI-DOST) and the Philippine Council of Mathematics Teacher Education (MATHTED), Inc.
Verma, E. (2021, February 11). How to measure training effectiveness in 2021. Simplilearn. https://www.simplilearn.com/how-to-measure-effectiveness-corporate-training-article
Cite this article:
Pentang, J.T. (2021). Impact assessment and clients’ feedback towards MATHEMATICS project implementation. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(2), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.53378/346107
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
Find this article in:
Most read articles
- Social media usage and the academic performance of Filipino junior high school students
- A narrative exploration of romantic experiences and ideal relationship standards among Filipino Gen Z
- Exploring the factors influencing commuters’ satisfaction and the use of public utility buses in Quezon City, Philippines
- Students’ exposure to social media and their radical involvement on the societal issues in the Philippines
- ChatGPT integration significantly boosts personalized learning outcomes: A Philippine study
- Tiktok made me book it: The impact of Tiktok on tourism destination selection of generation Z and millennials in Manila
- Senior high school students’ awareness and literacy on computer software applications
- Self-perception of ABM students towards their academic, social and emotional college preparedness
- Enhancing financial literacy among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program beneficiaries
- Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy of university student leaders