This study examined the students’ perception on the collaborative-constructivist learning experience in the online education of the Laguna State Polytechnic University (LSPU) during the ‘new normal’ learning modality due to COVID-19 pandemic. The study utilized the descriptive-survey research using the Online Learning Environment Survey (OLLES) questionnaire comprising the seven (7) components namely: student collaboration, computer competence, active learning, teacher support, information design and appeal, material environment, and reflective thinking and the Community of Inquiry (COI) survey on the online learning experiences on social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The data were gathered from the 106 fourth year students of the College of Teacher Education (CTE) through Google Form. The findings proved that the respondents have a favorable perception on their online learning environment in terms of collaboration, computer competence, active learning, teacher support, information design and appeal, material environment, and reflective thinking. The outcomes exhibited a positive perception of learners towards social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence in their learning experiences. The findings of the current investigation also pointed that there is a significant relationship between learners' online learning environment and their learning experiences in the new normal education. Through this, educators will be able to deliver a collaborative-constructivist learning experience among learners.
online education, active learning environment, collaborative-constructivist learning experience, community of inquiry, new normal
Agripina F. Banayo. Corresponding Author. Associate Professor III, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Chris Jezrel B. Barleta. Part-time Instructor, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo City Campus
Anderson, T.; Rourke, L.; Garrison, D.R.; Archer, W. (2001). Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context. J. Asynchronous Netw. 5, 1–17. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.409.9114&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Arbaugh, B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., Garrison, D., Ice, P., Richardson, J., Shea, P. & Swan, K. (2008). Community of Inquiry Survey. https://coi.athabascau.ca/coi-model/coi-survey/
Arbaugh, B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D., Ice, P., Richardson, J., Swan, K. (2008). Validating a Measurement Tool of Presence in Online Communities of Inquiry.
Bates, T. (2000). Distance education in dual mode higher education institutions: Challenges and changes. University of British Columbia, Continuing Studies: Distance Education & Technology: http://bates.cstudies.ubc.ca/
Callo, E. & Yazon, A. (2020). Exploring the Factors Influencing the Readiness of Faculty and Students on Online Teaching and Learning as an Alternative Delivery Mode for the New Normal. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3509 – 3518. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080826.
Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (1999). Students’ perceptions of the efficacy of Web- based learning environment: The emergence of a new learning instrument. Paper presented at the HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne.
Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2001). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument to evaluate online learning in higher education. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle.
Charlotte N. Gunawardena & Frank J. Zittle (1997) Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment, American Journal of Distance Education, 11:3, 8-26, DOI: 10.1080/08923649709526970
CHED. (2020). CHED COVID-19 ADVISORY NO. 3. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/CHED-COVID-2019- Advisory-No.-3.pdf
Clayton, J. (2007). Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Online Learning Environments in Tertiary Education: The Online Learning Environment Survey (OLLES). Curtin University of Technology, Science and Mathematics Education Centre.
Clayton, J. (2007). Validation of the online learning environment survey. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. https://www.ascilite.org/
Cooper, V. A., Forino, G., Kanjanabootra, S., & von Meding, J. (2020). Leveraging the community of inquiry framework to support web-based simulations in disaster studies. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100757.
Cummings, C., Mason, D., Shelton, K., & Baur, K. (2017). Active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments. In Flipped instruction: breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 88-114). IGI Global.
Czerkawski, B. & Lyman, E. (2016). An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments. TechTrends. 60. 10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
DOH. (2021). Department of Health Philippines. https://doh.gov.ph/covid19tracker
Dunlap, J. C. & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Online educators’ recommendations for teaching online: Crowdsourcing in action. Open Praxis, 10(1), 79-89.
Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. (1994). Assessing and researching the classroom environment. In D. Fisher (Ed.), The Study of Learning Environments (Vol. 8, pp. 23-39). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. (Eds.). (1995). Improving science education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Further Education Resources for Learning. (2007). Ferl practitioners’ programme. Becta, Further Education Resources for Learning (FERL): http://ferl.becta.org.uk/
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education Model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105
Garrison, D.R.; Anderson, T.; Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet High. Educ.,13, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D.R.; Arbaugh, J.B (2007). Community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet High. Educ. 10, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Gurley, L. E. (2018). Educators’ Preparation to Teach, Perceived Teaching Presence, and Perceived Teaching Presence Behaviors in Blended and Online Learning Environments. Online learning, 22(2), 197-220. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1181399.pdf
Haynes, D. (2002). The social dimensions of online learning: Perceptions, theories and practical responses. Paper presented at the Distance Education Association of New Zealand, Wellington.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Facilitating collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 7-24. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.2245&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Jo IH., Yu T., Lee H., Kim Y. (2015) Relations between Student Online Learning Behavior and Academic Achievement in Higher Education: A Learning Analytics Approach. In: Chen G., Kumar V., Kinshuk, Huang R., Kong S. (eds) Emerging Issues in Smart Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_38
Kear, Karen (2010). Social presence in online learning communities. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, 3-4 May 2010, Aalborg, Denmark. https://oro.open.ac.uk/21777/2/299A98F0.pdf
Kent, J., O’Neil, A., & Page, N. (2006). Improving tertiary teaching: An online approach to professional development. [Electronic version]. In Experience of Learning. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 1-2 February 2006. Perth: The University of Western Australia.
Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2019). Posting patterns of students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in online learning. https://open.metu.edu.tr/
Ladyshewsky, R. (2004). Online learning versus face to face learning: What is the difference? [Electronic version]. Seeking Educational Excellence. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 9-10 February 2004. Perth: Murdoch University. http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/
Levin, B.B. He, Y., & Robbins, H.H. (2006). Comparative analysis of preservice teachers’ reflective thinking in synchronous vs. asynchronous online case discussions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 439-460. https://libres.uncg.edu/
Lodico, M., Spaulding, D., & Voegtle, K. (2006). Methods in Educational Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://stikespanritahusada.ac.id/
Louis-Jean, J., & Cenat, K. (2020). Beyond the Face-to-Face Learning: A Contextual Analysis. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0077. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8466
Mann, B. (2000). Internet provision of enrichment opportunities to school and home. [Electronic version]. Australian Educational Computing, 15(1). http://www.acce.edu.au/journal/
Mbati, L.A. (2012). Online learning for social constructivism: creating a conducive environment. Vol. 34, No. 2.
McPherson, M. A., & Nunes, J. M. B. (2004). The role of tutors as an integral part of online learning support. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning.
Meiselwitz, G., & Trajkovski, G. (2006, June). Effects of computer competency on usability and learning experience in online learning environments. In Seventh ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD’06) (pp. 339-342). IEEE.
National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators 2006 [Electronic version]. Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06
Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190. doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225
Quilter-Pinner H and Ambrose A (2020) The ‘new normal’: The future of education after Covid–19, IPPR. http://www.ippr.org/research/publications/the-new-normal
Radford, A. J. (1997). The Future of Multimedia in Education. First Monday, Volume 2, Number 11.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P. et al. (2021). Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigit Sci Educ 3, 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
Rovai, A.P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
Seckman, C. (2018). Impact of interactive video communication versus text-based feedback on teaching, social, and cognitive presence in online learning communities. Nurse Educator, 43(1), 18-22. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000448
Shea, P.J. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online learning environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1).
Siragusa, L. (2005). Identification of effective instructional design principles and learning strategies for students studying in Web-based learning environments in higher education. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.
Thompson, T.L., MacDonald, C.J. (2005). Community building, emergent design and expecting the unexpected: Creating a quality eLearning experience. The Internet and Higher Education, 8 (3), 233-249.
Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2001. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311
Wood, C. (2005). Highschool.com. Edutopia Magazine, April/May, 32-37.
Worldometer. (2021). COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Zhu, E., McKnight, R., & Edwards, N. (2007). Principles of online design. Florida Gulf Coast University, Faculty of Development and Support: http://www.fgcu.edu/onlinedesign/
Cite this article:
Banayo, A.F. & Barleta, C.B. (2021). Online education as an active learning environment in the new normal. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(4), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.53378/352078
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
