Abstract
This study aimed to identify and categorize the errors in spoken English among Grade 12 students based on the Linguistic Category Taxonomy of classification of errors by Dulay et al. (1982). Mixed sequential explanatory research design was used in the study. Participants were chosen from the two Senior High School strand offered at Aguinaldo T. Repiedad Sr. Integrated School using stratified random sampling. Recorded utterances from the picture-description and interview were analysed for errors using frequency count, mean rank, percentage and Mann-Whitney U Test to determine the major errors and the significant differences of these errors when participants were grouped according to academic track and exposure to English-related media. Results showed that students committed more errors in syntax and articulation of consonant sounds. Moreover, they have difficulty with noun and verb inflections in terms of its morphological component. Additionally, in terms of its syntactical component, the three highest number of errors recorded were on verb, preposition, and noun usage. On the other hand, the students’ Senior High School track/strand or exposure to English-related media have no direct influence on the extent of errors the students committed in their utterances. Based on the results, it is recommended that English instruction be strengthened especially in teaching grammar and pronunciation and use authentic and relevant assessment tools when teaching to allow students to practice oral fluency of the target language.
Keywords: error analysis, linguistic category taxonomy, phonology, morphology, syntax, English-related media
References
Alaga, N. A. C., & Palencia, R. S. (2015). Media Exposure and Students’ Communicative English as Second Language (ESL) Performance. Countryside Development Research Journal, 3(02), 71-81.
Al-Rubaat, A. & Alshammari, H. (2020). Analysis of phonetic and phonological constraints of Saudi EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 13(1). DOI:10.5539/elt.v13n1p63
Al-Zoubi, S. M. (2018). The impact of exposure to English language on language acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5 (4), 151-162.
Borlongan, A. M. (2009). A survey on language use, attitudes and identity in relation to Philippine English among young generation of Filipinos: An initial sample from a private school. Philippine ESL Journal, 3. Manila, Philippines: De La Salle University.
Castor, S. M. et al. (2013). Error analysis in spoken english among BSED English majors. Iloilo City: West Visayas State University.
Chang, S.L., Mahadhir, M. & Ting, S.H (2010). Grammatical errors in spoken English university students in oral communication course. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 10 (1), 53-70.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3. Los Angeles: Sage.
de la Cruz, B. & Zorc, D. P. (1968). A Study of the Aklanon dialect. Volume One: Grammar. Washington, D.C.: Peace Corps.
Jahan, S. (2017). Error analysis on spoken English at undergraduate level in Bangladesh. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 5 (3).
James, Carl (2013). Errors in Language learning and use (exploring error analysis). 102-113. New York. Route ledge
Johnson B.R., Onwuegbuzie A.J., & Turner L.A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1,112–133.
Kamlasi, I. (2019). Describing the students’ grammatical errors on spoken English. ELT-lectura. 6. 83-91.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Internet Edition July 2009. University of Southern California.
Leaño, A. et al. (2019, Novemeber 25). Speaking difficulties of Philippine indigenous learners in English semantics. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 8(2), 16-27.
Lyons, D. (2017). How many people speak English, and where is it spoken. Babbel Magazine. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/how-many-people-speak-english-and-where is-it-spoken/.
Mangahas, M. (2016). Numbers on Filipino, Cebuano and English. Inquirer.Net. September 10, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2020 from https://opinion.inquirer.net/97210/numbers-on-filipino-cebuanoandenglish#ixzz6TjtjH l93.
Mardijono, J. (2003). Indonesian EFL advanced learners’ grammatical error. Petra Christian University, 5 (1),67 – 90.
Mashoor, B. & Abdullah, A. (2020). Error analysis of spoken English language among Jordanian secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Research, 8 (5).
Ortega, S. G. (2011). Media exposure and English language proficiency levels: A comparative study in Iceland and Spain. University of Iceland. Retrieved May 6, 2021 from https://skemman.is/
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results From PISA 2018. (2019). I-III. OECD. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/ PISA2018_CN_PHL.pdf
Purnama, S. (2019). The impact of listening phonological errors on speaking. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(6), 175–188.
Qasim, H. et al. (2019). Influence of social background on English language proficiency at secondary level, 3 (1), 207-222. Pakistan Social Sciences Review.
Ramasari, M. (2017). Students’ pronunciation error made in speaking for general communication. Journal of Linguistics, English Education and Art (LEEA), 1(1), 45-47.
Risdianto, F. (2017). A phonological analysis on the English consonants of Sundanese EFL speakers. Jurnal Arbitrer, 4(1), 27.
Safrida (2016). Grammatical errors: An analysis in speaking produced by EFL undergraduate students. Research in English and Education (READ) Journal 1(1), 71-80
Tabula, M. (2010). Linguistic errors in the oral expositions of speech communication students of the College of Teacher Education in the University of Northern Philippines. UNP Research Journal, 14, 88-114.
