This study focused on the preparedness and promotion of technology leadership towards self- efficacy and instructional performance of public elementary school teachers. This utilized 442 public elementary school teachers from Candelaria, Quezon through a descriptive correlational design conducted during academic year 2021- 2022. A researcher- made survey questionnaire was utilized via Google form. The study revealed that self- efficacy was significantly predicted by systematic development when it comes to preparedness of technology leadership while promotion of technology leadership, self- efficacy was significantly predicted by technology infrastructure and support and vision, planning and management. Meanwhile, instructional performance was significantly predicted by systematic development and visionary leadership when it comes to preparedness of technology leadership while promotion of technology leadership, it was significantly predicted by vision, planning and management, technology and infrastructure support, and evaluation and research. This implies that working with peers and doing reflection may also help in enhancing self-evaluation towards teaching performance so teachers can assess points they are good at and they need to develop further.
promotion of technology leadership, preparedness of technology leadership, self- efficacy, instructional performance
Abun, D., Ubasa, A.L.A., Magallanes, T., Encarnacion, M.J. & Ranay, F.B. (2021). Attitude toward the work and its influence on the Individual work performance of employees: Basis for Attitude Management. Technium Social Science Journal, 18, 378-394.
Abun, D., Magallanes, T., Acidera, E.B. Encarnacion, M.J., & Domingcil, C.U. (2021). Work Environment and work Engagement of Employees of the Catholic Colleges in the Ilocos Region, Philippines. Technium Social Science Journal, 19, 439-464
Banoğlu, K. (2011) School Principals’ Technology Leadership Competency and Technology Coordinatorship, Article in Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, December 2011
Beebe, S. A. & Masterson, J. T. (2011). Communicating in small groups: Principles and practices 10th Eds. Pearson.
Bellibas, M.S., Liu, Y. (2017). Multilevel analysis of The Relationship Between Principals’ Perceived Practices of Instructional Leadership and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration, 55 (1): pp. 49-69, DOI 10.1108/JEA-12-2015-0116.
Bocconi, S. Panagiotis Kampylis & Yves Punie (2013) Framing ICT-enabled Innovation for Learning: the case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2013
Celep, C. & Tülübaş,T (2014). Effect of Principals’ Technological Leadership on Teachers’ Attitude towards the Use of Educational Technologies. In: Passey, D., Tatnall, A. (eds) Key Competencies in ICT and Informatics. Implications and Issues for Educational Professionals and Management. ITEM 2014. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 444. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45770-2_21
Chang, I. H. (2012). The effect of principals’ technological leadership on principals’ technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 328-340.
Dexter, S. (2018). The role of leadership for information technology in education: Systems of practices. Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, 483-498.
Dibapile, W. (2012). A review of literature on teacher efficacy and classroom management. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(2), 79-92.
Hsieh,C.C., & Hsiao, W. C., 2013. The study on the relationship between principals’ technology leadership and student learning achievement in elementary school: School ICT use as a mediator. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, Vol. 27, pp.291-324.
ISTE (2014). Educational technology standards and performance indicators for administrators, retrieved July 28, 2008 from http://cnets.iste.org/
Khan, A. A., et al. (2016). Impact of training and development of employees on employee performance through job satisfaction: A study of telecom sector of Pakistan. Business Management and Strategy, 7(1), 29-46.
Kivunja, C. (2013). Embedding digital pedagogy in pre-service higher education to better prepare teachers for the digital generation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2(4), 131–142.
Koc,T and Ugur, N. G. (2019). Leading and teaching with technology: School principals’ perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 42–71.
Littlejohn, S. W. & Foss, K. A. (2010). Theories of Human Communication 10th Eds. Waveland Press, Inc.
McLeod, S., Richardson, J. W., & Sauers, N. J. (2015). Leading technology-rich school districts: Advice from tech-savvy superintendents. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(2), 104-126.
Molina, O. (2018) Visionary Leadership In The Administrative Staff Of The Guapan Educational Unit. Journal of Technology and Science EducationJOTSE, 2018 – 8(2): 115-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.413
Mwawasi, Felix Mndenyi (2014). Technology Leadership and ICT Use: Strategies for Capacity Building for ICT integration. Journal for Learning and Development, Vol. 1, No. 2,
Mwema, N.W., & Gachunga, H.G. (2014). The influence of performance appraisal on employee productivity in organizations: A case study of selected WHO offices in East Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1 (11), 324-337.
Paris D. & Alim, H. S. (2015). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), p. 85-100.
Perkmen, S., & Pamuk, S. (2011). Social cognitive predictors of pre-service teachers’ technology integration performance. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9109-x
Pai, J. C., & Tu, F. M. (2011). The acceptance and use of customer relationship management (CRM) systems: An empirical study of distribution service industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 579-584.
Peng, J., Miao, D., and Xiao, W. (2013). Why are gainers more risk seeking? Judgment and Decision Making, 8(2): 150-160
Peng, Y., and Mao, C. (2015). The impact of person–job fit on job satisfaction: the mediator role of Self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 121(3): 805-813
Petko, D. (2018) The Interplay of School Readiness and Teacher Readiness for Educational Technology Integration: A Structural Equation Model. Computers in the Schools, 35:1, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
Richardson, J. W., Flora, K., & Bathon, J. (2013). Fostering a school technology vision in school leaders. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 144-160.
Sailin, Siti Nazuar; Mahmor, Noor Aida (2018) Improving Student Teachers’ Digital Pedagogy through Meaningful Learning Activities. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, v15 n2 p143-173 Dec 2018
Wadmany, Rivka; Kliachko, Sarah (2014) The Significance of Digital Pedagogy: Teachers’ Perceptions and the Factors Influencing Their Abilities as Digital Pedagogues. Journal of Educational Technology, v11 n3 p22-33
Weng, C. H. and Tang,Y.(2014). The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness of school administration: An empirical study. Computers & Education, vol. 76, pp. 91–107.
Yulindasari, N.O. (2020). Principal’s Visionary Leadership in the Framework of School Change Process. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 508,1st International Conference on Information Technology and Education (ICITE 2020)
Jaime D. Macatangay, Jr. Teacher III, Department of Education- Division of Quezon, Pahinga Norte Elementary School
Eden C. Callo. Research Adviser, Laguna State Polytechnic University, San Pablo City Campus
Cite this article:
Macatangay, J.D. & Callo, E.C. (2022). Preparedness and promotion of technology leadership toward self-efficacy and instructional performance. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 3(3), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.53378/352920
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License.
